skip to main content
10.1145/3532719.3543257acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

In Situ Segmentation of Turbulent Flow with Topology Data Analysis

Published:25 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.

References

  1. Utkarsh Ayachit, Andrew Bauer, Berk Geveci, Patrick O’Leary, Kenneth Moreland, Nathan Fabian, and Jeffrey Mauldin. 2015. ParaView Catalyst: Enabling In Situ Data Analysis and Visualization. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on In Situ Infrastructures for Enabling Extreme-Scale Analysis and Visualization (Austin, TX, USA) (ISAV2015). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2828612.2828624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu. 2021. Immersed boundary conditions for hypersonic flows using ENO-like least-square reconstruction. Computers & Fluids 215(2021), 104794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H. Edelsbrunner and J. Harer. 2009. Computational Topology: An Introduction. AMS.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lin Fu. 2019. A low-dissipation finite-volume method based on a new TENO shock-capturing scheme. Computer Physics Communications 235 (2019), 25–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yukio Kaneda, Takashi Ishihara, Mitsuo Yokokawa, Ken’ichi Itakura, and Atsuya Uno. 2003. Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box. Physics of Fluids 15, 2 (2003), L21–L24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Keiichi Kitamura and Eiji Shima. 2013. Towards shock-stable and accurate hypersonic heating computations: A new pressure flux for AUSM-family schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 245(2013), 62–83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Meng-Sing Liou. 2006. A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds. Journal of computational physics 214, 1 (2006), 137–170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Katate Masatsuka. 2013. I do Like CFD, vol. 1. Vol. 1. Lulu. com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Omer San and Kursat Kara. 2015. Evaluation of Riemann flux solvers for WENO reconstruction schemes: Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Computers & Fluids 117(2015), 24–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Julien Tierny. 2018. Topological Data Analysis for Scientific Visualization. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Julien Tierny, Guillaume Favelier, Joshua A. Levine, Charles Gueunet, and Michael Michaux. 2017. The Topology ToolKit. (2017). https://topology-tool-kit.github.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Posters
    July 2022
    132 pages
    ISBN:9781450393614
    DOI:10.1145/3532719

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format