skip to main content
10.1145/3532720.3535632acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
course

Practical aspects of spectral data in digital content production

Published:02 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Compared to path tracing, spectral rendering is still often considered to be a niche application used mainly to produce optical wave effects like dispersion or diffraction. And while over the last years more and more people started exploring the potential of spectral image synthesis, it is still widely assumed to be only of importance in high-quality offline applications associated with long render times and high visual fidelity.

While it is certainly true that describing light interactions in a spectral way is a necessity for predictive rendering, its true potential goes far beyond that. Used correctly, not only will it guarantee colour fidelity, but it will also simplify workflows for all sorts of applications.

Wētā Digital's renderer Manuka showed that there is a place for a spectral renderer in a production environment and how workflows can be simplified if the whole pipeline adapts. Picking up from the course last year, we want to continue the discussion we started as we firmly believe that spectral data is the future in content production. The authors feel enthusiastic about more people being aware of the advantages that spectral rendering and spectral workflows bring and share the knowledge we gained over many years. The novel workflows emerged during the adaptation of spectral techniques at a number of large companies are introduced to a wide audience including technical directors, artists and researchers. However, while last year's course concentrated primarily on the algorithmic sides of spectral image synthesis, this year we want to focus on the practical aspects.

We will draw examples from virtual production, digital humans over spectral noise reduction to image grading, therefore showing the usage of spectral data enhancing each and every single part of the image pipeline.

References

  1. Catherine Cooksey, David Allen, and Benjamin Tsai. 2017. Reference Data Set of Human Skin Reflectance. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Weta Digital. 2022. Physlight. PhyslightGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R Donaldson. 1954. Spectrophotometry of fluorescent pigments. British Journal of Applied Physics 5, 6 (jun 1954), 210--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Luca Fascione, Johannes Hanika, Mark Leone, Marc Droske, Jorge Schwarzhaupt, Tomas Davidovic, Andrea Weidlich, and Johannes Meng. 2018. Manuka: A Batch-Shading Architecture for Spectral Path Tracing in Movie Production. ACM Transactions on Graphics 37 (08 2018), 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Alban Fichet, Romain Pacanowski, and Alexander Wilkie. 2021. An OpenEXR Layout for Spectral images. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques (JCGT) 10, 3 (29 September 2021), 1--18. http://jcgt.org/published/0010/03/01/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Qingqin Hua, Alban Fichet, and Alexander Wilkie. 2021. A Compact Representation for Fluorescent Spectral Data. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering - DL-only Track, Adrien Bousseau and Morgan McGuire (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Longqian Huang, Ruichen Luo, Xu Liu, and Xiang Hao. 2022. Spectral imaging with deep learning. Light: Science & Applications 11 (03 2022), 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wenzel Jakob and Johannes Hanika. 2019. A Low-Dimensional Function Space for Efficient Spectral Upsampling. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 38, 2 (March 2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Alisa Jung, A. Wilkie, J. Hanika, W. Jakob, and C. Dachsbacher. 2019. Wide Gamut Spectral Upsampling with Fluorescence. Computer Graphics Forum 38 (07 2019), 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lars König, Alisa Jung, and Carsten Dachsbacher. 2020. Improving Spectral Upsampling with Fluorescence. In Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling, Reinhard Klein and Holly Rushmeier (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tom Lister, Philip A. Wright, and Paul H. Chappell. 2012. Optical properties of human skin. Journal of Biomedical Optics 17, 9 (2012), 1 -- 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ian Mallett and Cem Yuksel. 2019. Spectral Primary Decomposition for Rendering with sRGB Reflectance. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering - DL-only and Industry Track, Tamy Boubekeur and Pradeep Sen (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Johannes Meng, Florian Simon, Johannes Hanika, and Carsten Dachsbacher. 2015. Physically meaningful rendering using tristimulus colours. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 34. Wiley Online Library, 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Arash Mirhashemi. 2018. Introducing spectral moment features in analyzing the SpecTex hyperspectral texture database. Machine Vision and Applications 29 (04 2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hisanari Otsu, Masafumi Yamamoto, and Toshiya Hachisuka. 2018. Reproducing spectral reflectances from tristimulus colours. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 37. Wiley Online Library, 370--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mark S. Peercy. 1993. Linear Color Representations for Full Speed Spectral Rendering. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (Anaheim, CA) (SIGGRAPH '93). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Scyllarus. 2016. HSZ Data Format. https://scyllarus.data61.csiro.au/data/hsz-data-format/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brian Smits. 1999. An RGB-to-spectrum conversion for reflectances. Journal of Graphics Tools 4, 4 (1999), 11--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yinlong Sun, M.S. Drew, and F.D. Fracchia. 1999. Representing spectral functions by a composite model of smooth and spiky components for efficient full-spectrum photorealism. In Proceedings Workshop on Photometric Modeling for Computer Vision and Graphics (Cat. No.PR00271). 4--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lucia Tódová, Alexander Wilkie, and Luca Fascione. 2021. Moment-based Constrained Spectral Uplifting. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering - DL-only Track, Adrien Bousseau and Morgan McGuire (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mark van de Ruit and Elmar Eisemann. 2021. A multi-pass method for accelerated spectral sampling. Computer Graphics Forum 40 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Andrea Weidlich, Alex Forsythe, Scott Dyer, Thomas Mansencal, Johannes Hanika, Alexander Wilkie, Luke Emrose, and Anders Langlands. 2021. Spectral Imaging in Production: Course Notes Siggraph 2021. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Courses (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGGRAPH '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 90 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rex West, Iliyan Georgiev, Adrien Gruson, and Toshiya Hachisuka. 2020. Continuous Multiple Importance Sampling. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 136 (jul 2020), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Wilkie, S. Nawaz, M. Droske, A. Weidlich, and J. Hanika. 2014. Hero Wavelength Spectral Sampling. In Proceedings of the 25th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (Lyon, France) (EGSR '14). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 123--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Alexander Wilkie, Robert Tobler, and Werner Purgathofer. 2000. Raytracing of Dispersion Effects in Transparent Materials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chris Wyman, Peter-Pike Sloan, and Peter Shirley. 2013. Simple Analytic Approximations to the CIE XYZ Color Matching Functions. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques (JCGT) 2, 2 (12 July 2013), 1--11. http://jcgt.org/published/0002/02/01/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. X-Rite. 2022. AxF Data Format. https://www.xrite.com/appearance-exchange-format-axfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [n.d.]. In-camera VFX Camera Color Calibration. https://docs.unrealengine.com/4.27/en-US/WorkingWithMedia/IntegratingMedia/InCameraVFX/InCameraVFXCameraCalibration/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Carlos F Borges. 1991. Trichromatic approximation for computer graphics illumination models. In Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH '91). 101--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Paul Debevec. 1998. Rendering Synthetic Objects into Real Scenes: Bridging Traditional and Image-Based Graphics with Global Illumination and High Dynamic Range Photography. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 189--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Paul Debevec, Andreas Wenger, Chris Tchou, Andrew Gardner, Jamie Waese, and Tim Hawkins. 2002. A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compositing. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3 (Jul 2002), 547--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jonathan Erland. 2011. Chromatic Chaos: Implications of Newly Introduced Forms of Stage-light. National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nahum Gat and CA Torrance. 1998. Real-time multi-and hyper-spectral imaging for remote sensing and machine vision: an overview. In Proc. 1998 ASAE Annual International Mtg. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierre-Loïc Hamon, James Harmer, Stuart Penn, and Nicolas Scapel. 2014. Gravity: Motion control and face integration. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Talks. 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jay Holben. 2020. The Mandalorian: This Is the Way. https://ascmag.com/articles/the-mandalorianGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jack Holm, Tom Maier, Paul Debevec, Chloe LeGendre, Joshua Pines, Jonathan Erland, George Joblove, Scott Dyer, Blake Sloan, Joe di Gennaro, et al. 2016. A cinematographic spectral similarity index. In SMPTE 2016 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SMPTE, 1--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jun Jiang, Dengyu Liu, Jinwei Gu, and Sabine Süsstrunk. 2013. What is the space of spectral sensitivity functions for digital color cameras?. In 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 168--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Noah Kadner. 2021a. 1899 Wraps Innovative Virtual Production. https://ascmag.com/articles/1899-wraps-virtual-productionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Noah Kadner. 2021b. Color Fidelity in LED Volumes. https://ascmag.com/articles/color-fidelity-in-led-volumesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Noah Kadner. 2021c. On The Walls: Virtual Production for Series Shooting. https://ascmag.com/articles/on-the-wallsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Chloe LeGendre, Lukas Lepicovsky, and Paul Debevec. 2022. Jointly Optimizing Color Rendition and In-Camera Backgrounds in an RGB Virtual Production Stage. (arXiv.org) (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Chloe LeGendre, Xueming Yu, and Paul Debevec. 2017. Optimal LED selection for multi-spectral lighting reproduction. Electronic Imaging 2017, 8 (2017), 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Chloe LeGendre, Xueming Yu, Dai Liu, Jay Busch, Andrew Jones, Sumanta Pattanaik, and Paul Debevec. 2016. Practical multispectral lighting reproduction. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Calvin S McCamy, Harold Marcus, James G Davidson, et al. 1976. A color-rendition chart. J. App. Photog. Eng 2, 3 (1976), 95--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Muhammad Uzair, Arif Mahmood, Faisal Shafait, Christian Nansen, and Ajmal Mian. 2015. Is spectral reflectance of the face a reliable biometric? Optics express 23, 12 (2015), 15160--15173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Andrea Weidlich, Alex Forsythe, Scott Dyer, Thomas Mansencal, Johannes Hanika, Alexander Wilkie, Luke Emrose, and Anders Langlands. 2021. Spectral imaging in production: course notes Siggraph 2021. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Courses. 1--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Andreas Wenger, Tim Hawkins, and Paul Debevec. 2003. Optimizing color matching in a lighting reproduction system for complex subject and illuminant spectra. In Rendering Techniques. Citeseer, 249--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Carlos Aliaga, Christophe Hery, and Mengqi Xia. 2022. Estimation of Spectral Biophysical Skin Properties from Captured RGB Albedo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarah Alotaibi and William AP Smith. 2017. A biophysical 3D morphable model of face appearance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops. 824--832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Gladimir VG Baranoski and Aravind Krishnaswamy. 2010. Light and skin interactions: simulations for computer graphics applications. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Alexey N Bashkatov, Elina A Genina, and Valery V Tuchin. 2011. Optical properties of skin, subcutaneous, and muscle tissues: a review. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences 4, 01 (2011), 9--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Benedikt Bitterli, Srinath Ravichandran, Thomas Müller, Magnus Wrenninge, Jan Novák, Steve Marschner, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2018. A Radiative Transfer Framework for Non-Exponential Media. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 6, Article 225 (Dec. 2018), 17 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Tenn F Chen, Gladimir VG Baranoski, Bradley W Kimmel, and Erik Miranda. 2015. Hyper-spectral modeling of skin appearance. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 3 (2015), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Blender Online Community. 2020. Blender: a 3D modelling and rendering package. (2020). http://www.blender.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Carolin Czekalla, Karl Heinz Schönborn, Jürgen Lademann, and Martina C Meinke. 2019. Noninvasive determination of epidermal and stratum corneum thickness in vivo using two-photon microscopy and optical coherence tomography: Impact of body area, age, and gender. Skin pharmacology and physiology 32, 3 (2019), 142--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Philip E Dennison, Kerry Q Halligan, and Dar A Roberts. 2004. A comparison of error metrics and constraints for multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis and spectral angle mapper. Remote Sensing of Environment 93, 3 (2004), 359--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Craig Donner and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2006. A Spectral BSSRDF for Shading Human Skin. Rendering techniques 2006 (2006), 409--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Eugene d' Eon. 2019. A Reciprocal Formulation of Nonexponential Radiative Transfer. 2: Monte Carlo Estimation and Diffusion Approximation. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Transport 48, 6 (Sep 2019), 201--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Eugene d'Eon. 2021. A Hitchhiker's Guide to Multiple Scattering. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas B Fitzpatrick. 1988. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of dermatology 124, 6 (1988), 869--871.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Lou Gevaux, Cyprien Adnet, Pierre Séroul, Raphael Clerc, Alain Trémeau, Jean Luc Perrot, and Mathieu Hébert. 2019. Three-dimensional maps of human skin properties on full face with shadows using 3-D hyperspectral imaging. Journal of biomedical optics 24, 6 (2019), 066002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Lou Gevaux, Jordan Gierschendorf, Juliette Rengot, Marie Cherel, Pierre Séroul, Alex Nkengne, Julie Robic, Alain Trémeau, and Mathieu Hébert. 2021. Real-time skin chromophore estimation from hyperspectral images using a neural network. Skin Research and Technology 27, 2 (2021), 163--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Yuliya Gitlina, Giuseppe Claudio Guarnera, Daljit Singh Dhillon, Jan Hansen, Alexandros Lattas, Dinesh Pai, and Abhijeet Ghosh. 2020. Practical Measurement and Reconstruction of Spectral Skin Reflectance. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 75--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Louis G Henyey and Jesse L Greenstein. 1941. Diffuse radiation in the galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal 93 (1941), 70--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Jose A. Iglesias-Guitian, Carlos Aliaga, Adrian Jarabo, and Diego Gutierrez. 2015. A Biophysically-Based Model of the Optical Properties of Skin Aging. Computer Graphics Forum (EUROGRAPHICS 2015) 34, 2 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Steven L Jacques. 2013. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Physics in Medicine & Biology 58, 11 (2013), R37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Steven L Jacques and Daniel J McAuliffe. 1991. The melanosome: threshold temperature for explosive vaporization and internal absorption coefficient during pulsed laser irradiation. Photochemistry and photobiology 53, 6 (1991), 769--775.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Wenzel Jakob and Johannes Hanika. 2019. A Low-Dimensional Function Space for Efficient Spectral Upsampling. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics) 38, 2 (March 2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Adrian Jarabo, Carlos Aliaga, and Diego Gutierrez. 2018. A radiative transfer framework for spatially-correlated materials. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 4 (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Nirmal Keshava and John F Mustard. 2002. Spectral unmixing. IEEE signal processing magazine 19, 1 (2002), 44--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Aravind Krishnaswamy and Gladimir VG Baranoski. 2004. A biophysically-based spectral model of light interaction with human skin. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 23. Wiley Online Library, 331--340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Tom Lister, Philip A. Wright, and Paul H. Chappell. 2012. Optical properties of human skin. Journal of Biomedical Optics 17, 9 (2012), 1 -- 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Ian Mallett and Cem Yuksel. 2019. Spectral Primary Decomposition for Rendering with RGB Reflectance. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (EGSR 2019) (Strasbourg, France). The Eurographics Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Igor V Meglinski and Stephen J Matcher. 2002. Quantitative assessment of skin layers absorption and skin reflectance spectra simulation in the visible and near-infrared spectral regions. Physiological measurement 23, 4 (2002), 741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Scott Prahl and Steven L Jacques. [n.d.]. Tabulated Molar Extinction Coefficient for Hemoglobin in Water. https://omlc.org/spectra/hemoglobin/summary.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Iyad Salam Saidi. 1992. Transcutaneous optical measurement of hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Tadeusz Sarna and Harold A Swartz. 2006. The physical properties of melanins. The pigmentary system: physiology and pathophysiology (2006), 311--341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. MJC Van Gemert, Steven L Jacques, HJCM Sterenborg, and WM Star. 1989. Skin optics. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering 36, 12 (1989), 1146--1154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Bruce Walter, Stephen R. Marschner, Hongsong Li, and Kenneth E. Torrance. 2007. Micro-facet Models for Refraction through Rough Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 18th Eurographics Conference on Rendering Techniques (Grenoble, France) (EGSR'07). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 195--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Magnus Wrenninge, Ryusuke Villemin, and Christophe Hery. 2017. Path traced subsurface scattering using anisotropic phase functions and non-exponential free flights. Technical Report. Technical Memo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Evgeny Zherebtsov, Viktor Dremin, Alexey Popov, Alexander Doronin, Daria Kurakina, Mikhail Kirillin, Igor Meglinski, and Alexander Bykov. 2019. Hyperspectral imaging of human skin aided by artificial neural networks. Biomedical optics express 10, 7 (2019), 3545--3559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. George Zonios, Julie Bykowski, and Nikiforos Kollias. 2001. Skin melanin, hemoglobin, and light scattering properties can be quantitatively assessed in vivo using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 117, 6 (2001), 1452--1457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Benedikt Bitterli, Chris Wyman, Matt Pharr, Peter Shirley, Aaron Lefohn, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2020. Spatiotemporal reservoir resampling for real-time ray tracing with dynamic direct lighting. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH) 39, 4 (July 2020). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Guillaume Boissé. 2021. World-space spatiotemporal reservoir reuse for ray-traced Global illumination. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Jakub Boksansky, Paula Jukarainen, and Chris Wyman. 2021. Rendering Many Lights with Grid-Based Reservoirs. Apress, Berkeley, CA, 351--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Daqi Lin, Markus Kettunen, Benedikt Bitterli, Jacopo Pantaleoni, Cem Yuksel, and Chris Wyman. 2022. Generalized Resampled Importance Sampling: Foundations of ReSTIR. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2022) 41, 4, Article 75 (07 2022), 23 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Daqi Lin, Chris Wyman, and Cem Yuksel. 2021. Fast Volume Rendering with Spatiotemporal Reservoir Resampling. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia 2021) 40, 6, Article 279 (dec 2021), 18 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Y. Ouyang, S. Liu, M. Kettunen, M. Pharr, and Jacopo Pantaleoni. 2021. ReSTIR GI: Path Resampling for Real-Time Path Tracing. Computer Graphics Forum 40 (12 2021), 17--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Justin Talbot, David Cline, and Parris Egbert. 2005. Importance Resampling for Global Illumination. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 139--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. M. van de Ruit and E. Eisemann. 2021. A multi-pass method for accelerated spectral sampling. Computer Graphics Forum 40, 7 (2021), 141--148. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.14408 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Rex West, Iliyan Georgiev, Adrien Gruson, and Toshiya Hachisuka. 2020. Continuous Multiple Importance Sampling. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4, Article 136 (July 2020), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. A Wilkie, S Nawaz, Marc Droske, A Weidlich, and J Hanika. 2014. Hero Wavelength Spectral Sampling. Computer Graphics Forum 33 (07 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Courses
    August 2022
    2416 pages
    ISBN:9781450393621
    DOI:10.1145/3532720

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 August 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • course

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader