skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

FaceType: Crafting Written Impressions of Spoken Expression

Published:07 September 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

FaceType is an interactive installation that creates an experience of spoken communication through generated text. Inspired by Chinese calligraphy, the project transforms our spoken expression into handwriting. FaceType explores what parts of our spoken expression can be evoked in writing, and what the most natural form of interaction between the two might be. The work is aimed to allow lay audiences to experience emotion, emphasis, and critical information in speech. Further audience reflection about patterns in their expression and the role of unconscious and conscious expression provide new directions for further works.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3533385.mp4

presentation video

References

  1. Richard Brath and Ebad Banissi. 2016. Using typography to expand the design space of data visualization. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. (Spring 2016), Tongji University Press 2, 1 59--87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.05.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ziqian Chen, Gentiane Venture, and Marie-Luce Bourguet. 2018. A rendering model for emotional in-air handwriting. Proceedings of British HCI (July 2018), BCS Learning and Development 1--5. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Patricia Ebrey. 2001. A visual sourcebook of Chinese Civilization:calligraphy. Course Materials, Department of History, University of Washington. https://depts.washington.edu/chinaciv/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jongmin Kim. 2019. Leon Sans. GitHub repository. https://github.com/cmiscm/leonsansGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David Lapakko. 2007. Communication is 93% nonverbal: An urban legend proliferates. Communication and Theater Association, (Dec. 2007), CTAMJ 34, 1 7--14. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ctamj/vol34/iss1/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Golan Levin. 2013. Seminar Series, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/seminars/golan/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kevin Maher, Zeyuan Huang, Jiancheng Song, Xiaoming Deng. Yu-Kun Lai, Cuixia Ma, Hao Wang, Yong-Jin Liu, and Hongan Wang. 2022. E-ffective: A Visual Analytic System for Exploring the Emotion and Effectiveness of Inspirational Speeches. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. (January 2022), IEEE 28, 1 508 - 517. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ali Mollahosseini, Behzad Hasani, and Mohammad H. Mahoor. 2019. AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wild. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. (January 2019), IEEE 10, 1 18--31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2740923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fangbing Qu, Wen-Jing Yan, Yu-Hsin Chen, Kaiyun Li, Hui Zhang, and Xiaolan Fu. 2017. "You Should Have Seen the Look on Your Face...": Self-awareness of Facial Expressions. Frontiers in Psychology. (May 2017), Frontiers 10, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00832Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tara Rosenberger and Ronald L. MacNeil. 1999. Prosodic font: translating speech into graphics. In CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '99). ACM 252--253. https://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632872Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Edward Tufte. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2nd. ed.). Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yizhi Wang, Yue Gao, and Zhouhui Lian. 2020. Attribute2Font: creating fonts you want from attributes. ACM Trans. Graph. (August 2020), ACM 39, 4 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386569.3392456Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Colin Ware. 2022. Visual Thinking for Information Design (2nd. ed.). Elsevier Science, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Philip Yaffe. 2011. The 7% rule: fact, fiction, or misunderstanding. Ubiquity, (October 2011), ACM 1. 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043155.2043156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. FaceType: Crafting Written Impressions of Spoken Expression

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
        Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques  Volume 5, Issue 4
        September 2022
        145 pages
        EISSN:2577-6193
        DOI:10.1145/3563103
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 September 2022
        Published in pacmcgit Volume 5, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)196
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format