skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Dream Painter: Exploring creative possibilities of AI-aided speech-to-image synthesis in the interactive art context

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 September 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper describes an interactive robotic art installation Dream Painter by the artistic duo Varvara & Mar that deploys artificial intelligence (AI), a KUKA industrial robot and interaction technology in order to offer the audience an artistic interpretation of their past dreams, which are then turned into a collective painting. The installation is composed of four larger parts: audience interaction design, AI-driven multicoloured drawing software, communication with an arm robot, and a kinetic part that is the automatic paper progression following each completed dream drawing. All these interconnected parts are orchestrated into an interactive and autonomous system in the form of an art installation that occupies two floors of a cultural centre. In the article, we document the technical and conceptual frameworks of the project, and the experience gained through the creation and exhibition of the interactive robotic art installation. In addition, the paper explores the creative potential of speech-to-AI-drawing transformation, which is a translation of different semiotic spaces performed by a robot as a method for audience interaction in the art exhibition context.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3533386.mp4

References

  1. Roland Barthes. 1972. Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers (New York: Hill and Wang, 1972) 151 (1972), 82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vanessa Julia Carpenter and Elisa D. Mekler. 2019. Towards metrics of meaningfulness for tech practitioners. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Paul Cohen. 2016. Harold Cohen and AARON. Ai Magazine 37, 4 (2016), 63--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kevin Frans, Lisa Soros, and Olaf Witkowski. 2021. Clipdraw: Exploring text-to-drawing synthesis through language-image encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.14843 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Madeline Gannon. 2017. Human-centered Interfaces for autonomous fabrication machines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin Grosser. 2011. Interactive Robotic Painting Machine. Retrieved April 2, 2022 from https://bengrosser.com/projects/interactive-robotic-painting-machine/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Varvara Guljajeva. 2018. From Interaction to Post-participation: the Disappearing Role of the Active Participant. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Varvara Guljajeva. 2021. Synthetic Books. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Aaron Hertzmann. 2019. Aesthetics of neural network art. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.05696 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Aaron Hertzmann. 2020. Visual indeterminacy in GAN art. Leonardo 53, 4 (2020), 424--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Indrek Ibrus and Maarja Ojamaa. 2020. The Creativity of Digital (Audiovisual) Archives: A Dialogue Between Media Archaeology and Cultural Semiotics. Theory, Culture & Society 37, 3 (2020), 49--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tzu-Mao Li, Michal Lukáč, Michaël Gharbi, and Jonathan Ragan-Kelley. 2020. Differentiable vector graphics rasterization for editing and learning. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 6 (2020), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yuri M Lotman. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. Indiana University Press. 143 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniel Michelis and Jörg Müller. 2011. The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27, 6 (2011), 562--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Simone Natale and Andrea Ballatore. 2020. Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence. Convergence 26, 1 (2020), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Changhoon Oh, Jungwoo Song, Jinhan Choi, Seonghyeon Kim, Sungwoo Lee, and Bongwon Suh. 2018. I lead, you help but only with enough details: Understanding user experience of co-creation with artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fred Plaut. 2000. FREUD, SIGMUND. The Interpretation of Dreams. A New Translation by Joyce Crick. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Journal of Analytical Psychology 45, 4 (2000), 649--651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. 2021. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 8748--8763.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Eleanor Sandry. 2017. Creative collaborations with machines. Philosophy & Technology 30, 3 (2017), 305--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Peter Schaldenbrand, Zhixuan Liu, and Jean Oh. 2021. StyleCLIPDraw: Coupling Content and Style in Text-to-Drawing Synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.03133 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Uwe Seifert and Jin Hyun Kim. 2008. Towards a conceptual framework and an empirical methodology in research on artistic human-computer and human-robot interaction. In Human Computer Interaction. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Patrick Tresset and Oliver Deussen. 2014. Artistically skilled embodied agents. In AISB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Patrick Tresset and Frederic Fol Leymarie. 2012. Sketches by Paul the robot. In Proceedings of the eighth annual symposium on computational aesthetics in graphics, visualization, and imaging. 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Josh Urban Davis, Fraser Anderson, Merten Stroetzel, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2021. Designing Co-Creative AI for Virtual Environments. In Creativity and Cognition. 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Joseph Weizenbaum. 1976. Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dream Painter: Exploring creative possibilities of AI-aided speech-to-image synthesis in the interactive art context

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
        Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques  Volume 5, Issue 4
        September 2022
        145 pages
        EISSN:2577-6193
        DOI:10.1145/3563103
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 September 2022
        Published in pacmcgit Volume 5, Issue 4

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format