skip to main content
10.1145/3537674.3554747acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Using a Professional Skills Framework to Support the Assessment of Dispositions in IT Education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The IT2017 ACM/IEEE Curriculum Guidelines for Baccalaureate Degree Programs introduced a significantly new way of framing computing education curricula. Instead of focusing on how to structure the Information Technology body of knowledge, the IT2017 report centered its curricular recommendations on the competencies that IT programs are expected to develop in their graduates. A major contribution of the report is a model of IT competency that identifies three interrelated components: content knowledge, skills, and dispositions, where dispositions represent personal qualities desirable in the workplace.

Building on the IT2017 contributions, the ACM/IEEE Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020) report enriches the disposition concept by identifying eleven dispositions, such as being adaptable or self-directed, that all computing programs should include in the career preparation of their graduates. While the importance of dispositions is widely appreciated by both academic programs and employers, how to develop and assess dispositions in a degree program remains a challenge. A recent mapping of the eleven CC2020 dispositions to the responsibility characteristics of the Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA) opened a promising route for addressing this challenge. Inspired by this mapping, this paper’s aim is to help educators assess students’ achievement of CC2020 dispositions through the SFIA responsibility characteristics. Our proposed assessment method and tool are based on evidence of performance of tasks in real-world work settings, demonstrating SFIA responsibility characteristics, which are mapped to CC2020 dispositions. Furthermore, this paper validates the selection of SFIA to operationalize the CC2020 dispositions, by demonstrating that other IT skills frameworks would pose significant challenges for our assessment approach.

References

  1. J Bauer-Wolf. 2018. Overconfident Students, Dubious Employer. Inside Higher Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BCS: The Chartered Institute for IT. 2021. Become a Registered BCS member. https://www.bcs.org/membership-and-registrations/get-registered/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Bourque and R. E. Fairley. 2014. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK(R)). IEEE Computer Society Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D.S. Bowers. 2020. IoC – Mapping portfolio evidence to SFIA skills. Technical Report. The Institute of Coding. https://institute-of-coding.github.io/accreditation-standard/pubs/IoC-AP-12-2-V2.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. S. Bowers, M. Sabin, R. K. Raj, and J. Impagliazzo. 2022. Advancing Computing Education:Assessing CC2020 Dispositions. In Frontiers in Education 2022 - to appear (Uppsala, Sweden). IEEE, New York, NY, 9 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. S. Bowers, M. Sabin, R. K. Raj, and J. Impagliazzo. 2022. Computing Competencies: Mapping CC2020 Dispositions to SFIA Responsibility Characteristics. In 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (Tunis, Tunisia). IEEE, New York, NY, 428–437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David S. Bowers, Mihaela Sabin, Rajendra K. Raj, and John Impagliazzo. 2022. Sample Configurable Assessment Tool. https://assessing-computing-competencies.github.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. CEN/TC 428. 2019. CSN EN 16234-1 - e-Competence Framework (e-CF) - A common European Framework for ICT Professionals in all sectors - Part 1: Framework. Standard. CEN, the European Committee for Standardization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Clear, T. Clear, A. Vichare, T. Charles, S. Frezza, M. Gutica, B. Lunt, F. Maiorana, A. Pears, F. Pitt, C. Riedesel, and J. Szynkiewicz. 2020. Designing Computer Science Competency Statements: A Process and Curriculum Model for the 21st Century. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Trondheim, Norway) (ITiCSE-WGR ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 211–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Clear, A. Parrish, P. Ciancarini, S. Frezza, J. Gal-Ezer, J. Impagliazzo, A. Pears, S. Takada, H. Topi, G. van der Veer, A. Vichare, L. Waguespack, P. Wang, and M. Zhang. 2020. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E. Crowley and S. Miertschin. 2004. Developing Information Technology Career Path Awareness Through Student Online Portfolios. In 2004 Annual Conference. ASEE Conferences, Salt Lake City, Utah, 9.412.1 – 9.412.12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Eliot and J. Turns. 2011. Constructing Professional Portfolios: Sense-Making and Professional Identity Development for Engineering Undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education 100, 4 (Oct. 2011), 630–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00030.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R.E. Fairley, P. Bourque, and J. Keppler. 2014. The impact of SWEBOK Version 3 on software engineering education and training. In 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 192–200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Frezza, M. Daniels, A. Pears, Å. Cajander, V. Kann, A. Kapoor, R. McDermott, A.-K. Peters, M. Sabin, and C. Wallace. 2018. Modelling Competencies for Computing Education beyond 2020: A Research Based Approach to Defining Competencies in the Computing Disciplines. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148–174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart Research Associates. 2015. Falling Short? College Learning and Career Success. Technical Report. AACU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. IEEE Computer Society. 2014. Software Engineering Competency Model (SWECOM), Version 1.0. https://www.computer.org/volunteering/boards-and-committees/professional-educational-activities/software-engineering-competency-model.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. International Professional Practice Partnership. 2021. IP3 – the Global Partnership. https://www.ipthree.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. IPA. 2017. SFIA vs iCD Mapping Research Project. (December 2017). Accessed at: https://www.ipa.go.jp/files/000068830.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ISO. 2019. ISO/IEC 24773-1:2019 Software and systems engineering — Certification of software and systems engineering professionals — Part 1: General requirements. Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. IT Professionalism Europe. 2022. Concepts and Principles included in the e-CF. https://itprofessionalism.org/about-it-professionalism/competences/the-e-competence-framework/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. E. Jones. 2013. Practice-based evidence of evidence-based practice: professional practice portfolios for the assessment of work-based learning. Quality in Higher Education 19, 1 (2013), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2013.772467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A.L. Patton and M. McGill. 2006. Student Portfolios and Software Quality Metrics in Computer Science Education. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 21, 4 (apr 2006), 42–48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R.K. Raj, A.N. Kumar, M. Sabin, and J. Impagliazzo. 2022. Interpreting the ABET Computer Science Criteria Using Competencies. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R.K. Raj, M. Sabin, J. Impagliazzo, D.S. Bowers, M. Daniels, F. Hermans, N. Kiesler, A.N. Kumar, B. MacKellar, R. McCauley, S.W. Nabi, and M. Oudshoorn. 2021. Professional Competencies in Computing Education: Pedagogies and Assessment. In 2021 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Working Group Reports(ITiCSE WGR ’21). ACM, New York, 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502870.3506570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R.Petersen, D.Santos, K.A. Wetzel, M.C. Smith, and G. Witte. 2020. Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity (NICE Framework). NIST Special Publication 800-181, Revision 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mihaela Sabin, Hala Alrumaih, and John Impagliazzo. 2018. A competency-based approach toward curricular guidelines for information technology education. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Sabin, H. Alrumaih, J. Impagliazzo, B. Lunt, M. Zhang, B. Byers, W. Newhouse, B. Paterson, S. Peltsverger, C. Tang, G. van der Veer, and B. Viola. 2017. Information Technology Curricula 2017 (IT2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nigel Shadbolt. 2016. Shadbolt Review of Computer Sciences Degree Accreditation and Graduate. Employability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. The SFIA Foundation. 2021. SFIA - Skills Framework for the Information Age. https://sfia-online.org/en/about-sfia/sfia-guiding-principles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. The SFIA Foundation. 2021. SFIA 8 Levels of Responsibility. https://sfia-online.org/en/sfia-8/responsibilities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. K.A. Wetzel. 2021. NICE Framework Competencies: Assessing Learners for Cybersecurity Work Draft. Technical Report. US National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2021/NIST.IR.8355-draft2.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using a Professional Skills Framework to Support the Assessment of Dispositions in IT Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGITE '22: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education
      September 2022
      158 pages
      ISBN:9781450393911
      DOI:10.1145/3537674

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate176of429submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format