Managerial and Professional Skills and Dispositions from Professionals’ Interviews

ABSTRACT

Employability should be a primary objective for computing programs, as the majority of IT and other computing graduates go to work in industry upon graduation. Furthermore, students want to be prepared for a career, not just an entry-level job. However, literature has shown a gap between employers’ needs and undergraduates’ preparation in non-technical areas. Competencies (skills, knowledge, and dispositions) can be a common language used by both employers and educators. The more we learn about competencies employers expect, the more we can ensure programs match their expectations. This study focuses on competencies required by managers, by interviewing ten directors/managers, project managers, and product managers who had prior experience in computing-related roles. Each was asked to discuss competencies most important to their current position. Emerging themes identified the most important managerial skills (project management, evaluation of candidates, mentorship, managers’ own technical skills and knowledge, adjusting management style as needed, and appropriately assigning team members), professional skills (communication, problem solving, and relationship building), and dispositions (lifelong learning; adaptability/flexibility; being self-driven; self-awareness; being helpful, positive and pleasant; valuing communication and collaboration; having passion for technical work; and perseverance). Implications for education are discussed. This study is part of a larger NSF-funded project related to investigating the competencies required by computing professionals, and the design of educational resources to promote the development of these competencies.

References

1. ABET (2022). ABET Criterial for Accrediting Computing Programs, 2022 – 2023. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2022-2023/
2. A. Clear, A. Parrish, P. Ciancarini, S. Frezza, J. Gal-Ezer, J. Impagliazzo, A. Pears, S. Takada, H. Topi, G. van der Veer, A. Vichare, L. Waguespack, P. Wang, and M. Zhang. 2020. Computing Curricula 2020 (CC2020): Paradigms for Future Computing Curricula.
3. Barry M. Lunt, Joseph J. Ekstrom, Sandra Gorka, Gregory Hislop, Reza Kamali, Eydie Lawson, Richard LeBlanc, Jacob Miller, and Han Reichgelt. 2008. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Technical Report. Association for Computing.
4. Capretz, L. F., & Ahmed, F. (2010). Why do we need personality diversity in software engineering? Software Engineering Notes, 35(2), 1–11.
5. Carracedo A., & Saiz, C. (2011). Skills and dispositions of critical thinking: Are they sufficient? Anales de psicología, 27(1), 202-209.
6. Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol-Barosz, M., Miskiewicz, R., & Kwilinski, A. (2020). Manager competency assessment model in the conditions of industry 4.0. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2630–2644. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(5)
7. Frezza, S., & Adams, S. (2021). Bridging professionalism: Dispositions as means for relating competency across disciplines. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274058
8. Hart Research Associates. (2018, July). Fulfilling the American dream: Liberal education and the future of work. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2018EmployerResearchReport.pdf
9. Indeed Editorial Team (2021). 84 management job titles to know. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/management-job-titles
10. Janz, K., & Honken, R. (2013). Personality inventories and cognitive frames: understanding the balance in managing and leading IT organizations. Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2504776.2504798
11. Katz, L. G. (1993). Dispositions as Educational Goals. ERIC Digest.
12. Lee, H., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Role of leadership competencies and team social capital in IT services. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645645
13. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14. M. Sabin, H. Alrumaih, J. Impagliazzo, B. Lunt, M. Zhang, B. Byers, W. Newhouse, B. Paterson, S. Peltsverger, C. Tang, G. van der Veer, and B. Viola. 2017. Information Technology Curricula 2017. Technical Report. ACM/IEEE Computer Society, https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3173161.
15. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
16. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm. Policy Ment. Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
17. Shet, S. V., & Pereira, V. (2021). Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173, 121080–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121080
18. M. Spreen. 1992. Race populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: What and why? Bullitin de Methodologie Sociologique, 36, 34–58.
19. Varona, D., Capretz, L. F., Piñero, Y., & Raza, A. (2012). Evolution of software engineers’ personality profile. Software Engineering Notes, 37(1).

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs