Is your digital neighbor a reliable investment advisor?

ABSTRACT

The web and social media platforms have drastically changed how investors produce and consume financial advice. Historically, individual investors were often relying on newsletters and related prospectus backed by the reputation and track record of their issuers. Nowadays, financial advice is frequently offered online, by anonymous or pseudonymous parties with little at stake. As such, a natural question is to investigate whether these modern financial “influencers” operate in good faith, or whether they might be misleading their followers intentionally. To start answering this question, we obtained data from a very large cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, from which we derived individual trading positions. Some of the investors on that platform elect to link to their Twitter profiles. We were thus able to compare the positions publicly espoused on Twitter with those actually taken in the market. We discovered that 1) staunchly “bullish” investors on Twitter often took much more moderate, if not outright opposite, positions in their own trades when the market was down, 2) their followers tended to align their positions with bullish Twitter outlooks, and 3) moderate voices on Twitter (and their own followers) were on the other hand far more consistent with their actual investment strategies. In other words, while social media advice may attempt to foster a sense of camaraderie among people of like-minded beliefs, the reality is that this is merely an illusion, which may result in financial losses for people blindly following advice.

References

1. Réka Albert and Albert-László Barabási. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 1 (Spring 2002), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
2. Carol Alexander, Jaehyuk Choi, Hamish R. A. Massie, and Sungbin Sohn. 2020. Price discovery and microstructure in ether spot and derivative markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 71 (Oct 2020), 101506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101506
3. Carol Alexander, Jaehyuk Choi, Heungju Park, and Sungbin Sohn. 2020. BitMEX bitcoin derivatives: Price discovery, informational efficiency, and hedging effectiveness. Journal of Futures Markets 40, 1 (2020), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22050
4. Turan G. Bali, David Hirshleifer, Lin Peng, and Yi Tang. 2021. Attention, Social Interaction, and Investor Attraction to Lottery Stocks. Number 29543. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29543
5. Abhijit V. Banerjee. 1992. A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 3 (Aug 1992), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
6. Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert. 1999. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286, 5439 (Oct 1999), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
7. Brad M. Barber, Xing Huang, Terrance Odean, and Christopher Schwarz. 2021. Attention Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3715077
8. Dirk G. Baur, KiHoon Hong, and Adrian D. Lee. 2018. Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets?Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 54 (May 2018), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004
9. Gary S. Becker. 1991. A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influences on Price. Journal of Political Economy 99, 5 (Oct 1991), 1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1086/261791
10. Bruno Biais, Christophe Bisiere, Matthieu Bouvard, Catherine Casamatta, and Albert J. Menkveld. 2022. Equilibrium Bitcoin Pricing. Number 3261063. Rochester, NY. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3261063
11. Sushil Bikhchandani, David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. 1992. A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy 100, 5 (Oct 1992), 992–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849
12. Jeffrey R. Brown, Zoran Ivković, Paul A. Smith, and Scott Weisbenner. 2008. Neighbors Matter: Causal Community Effects and Stock Market Participation. The Journal of Finance 63, 3 (2008), 1509–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01364.x
13. J. Anthony Cookson, Joseph Engelberg, and William Mullins. 2022. Echo Chambers. (Feb 2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3603107
14. Glenn Ellison and Drew Fudenberg. 1993. Rules of Thumb for Social Learning. Journal of Political Economy 101, 4 (Aug 1993), 612–643. https://doi.org/10.1086/261890
15. Glenn Ellison and Drew Fudenberg. 1995. Word-of-Mouth Communication and Social Learning. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 1 (Feb 1995), 93–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118512
16. Ming Gao, Juanjuan Meng, and Longkai Zhao. 2019. Income and social communication: The demographics of stock market participation. The World Economy 42, 7 (2019), 2244–2277. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12777
17. David Hirshleifer. 2020. Presidential Address: Social Transmission Bias in Economics and Finance. The Journal of Finance 75, 4 (2020), 1779–1831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12906
18. J. L. Hodges. 1958. The significance probability of the smirnov two-sample test. Arkiv för Matematik 3, 5 (Jan 1958), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589501
19. Harrison Hong, Jeffrey D. Kubik, and Jeremy C. Stein. 2004. Social Interaction and Stock-Market Participation. The Journal of Finance 59, 1 (2004), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00629.x
20. Albert S. Hu, Christine A. Parlour, and Uday Rajan. 2019. Cryptocurrencies: Stylized facts on a new investible instrument. Financial Management 48, 4 (2019), 1049–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12300
21. Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, and Tomas Mikolov. 2016. Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.01759 (2016).
22. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
23. Leonardo Nizzoli, Serena Tardelli, Marco Avvenuti, Stefano Cresci, Maurizio Tesconi, and Emilio Ferrara. 2020. Charting the Landscape of Online Cryptocurrency Manipulation. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 113230–113245. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3003370
24. Caitlin Ostroff and Jared Malsin. 2022. Turks Pile Into Bitcoin and Tether to Escape Plunging Lira - WSJ. Wall Street Journal (Jan 2022). https://www.wsj.com/articles/turks-pile-into-bitcoin-and-tether-to-escape-plunging-lira-11641982077
25. K. Soska, J.-D. Dong, A. Khodaverdian, A. Zetlin-Jones, B. Routledge, and N. Christin. 2021. Towards understanding cryptocurrency derivatives: A case study of BitMEX. In Proceedings of the 30th Web Conference (WWW’21). Ljubljana, Slovenia (online).
26. Shiliang Tang, Qingyun Liu, Megan McQueen, Scott Counts, Apurv Jain, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Zhao. 2017. Echo Chambers in Investment Discussion Boards. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 11, 1 (May 2017), 240–249. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14875
27. Michail Tsikerdekis and Sherali Zeadally. 2014. Online deception in social media. Commun. ACM 57, 9 (2014), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629612

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Electronic commerce

    • Digital cash

• General and reference

  • Cross-computing tools and techniques

    • Measurement

• Information systems

  • World Wide Web

    • Web applications

      • Social networks