10.1145/3544548.3581138acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Para Cima y Pa’ Abajo: Building Bridges Between HCI Research in Latin America and in the Global North

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Human-computer Interaction (HCI) community has the opportunity to foster the integration of research practices across the Global South and North to begin overcoming colonial relationships. In this paper, we focus on the case of Latin America (LATAM), where initiatives to increase the representation of HCI practitioners lack a consolidated understanding of the practices they employ, the factors that influence them, and the challenges that practitioners face. To address this knowledge gap, we employ a mixed-methods approach, comprising a survey (66 respondents) and in-depth interviews (19 interviewees). Our analyses characterize a set of research perspectives on how HCI is practiced in/about LATAM; a set of driving forces and tensions with a heavy reliance on diasporic dynamics; and a set of professional demands and associated structural limitations. We also offer a roadmap towards building connections across HCI communities, in an attempt to rebuild HCI as a pluriverse.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544548.3581138-talk-video.mp4

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

References

  1. J Adams, D Pendlebury, R Potter, and M Szomszor. 2021. Global Research Report. Latin America: South and Central America, Mexico and the Caribbean. Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). https://clarivate. com/news/clarivate-global-research-report-outlines-rising-impact-in-latin-america(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Muhammad Sadi Adamu. 2022. No More ‘Solutionism’ or ‘Saviourism’ in Futuring African HCI: A Manyfesto. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (nov 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571811 Just Accepted.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Sareeta Amrute, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Nicola Bidwell, Tawanna Dillahunt, Sane Gaytán, Naveena Karusala, Neha Kumar, Rigoberto Lara Guzmán, 2022. Citational justice and the politics of knowledge production. Interactions 29, 5 (2022), 78–82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ebtisam Alabdulqader, Norah Abokhodair, and Shaimaa Lazem. 2017. Designing for the Arab World. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3064860Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ebtisam Alabdulqader, Shaimaa Lazem, Soud Nassir, Mennatallah Saleh, Sara Armouch, and Susan Dray. 2019. With an Eye to the Future: HCI Practice and Research in the Arab World1. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Juan Pablo Alperin and Cecilia Rozemblum. 2017. La reinterpretación de visibilidad y calidad en las nuevas políticas de evaluación de revistas científicas. Revista Interamericana De Bibliotecología 40, 3 (2017), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v40n3a04Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Mayra D. Barrera Machuca, Franceli L. Cibrian, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Laura S. Gaytán-Lugo, Diego Gómez-Zará, Carla F. Griggio, Monica Perusquia-Hernandez, Soraia Silva-Prietch, Carlos E. Tejada, and Marisol Wong-Villacres. 2020. Fostering HCI Research in, by, and for Latin America. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381055Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tasia Aránguez Sánchez 2021. Feminismo digital: violencia contra las mujeres y brecha sexista en Internet. Feminismo digital (2021), 1–753.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaime Muñoz Artega and Alfredo Sánchez Huitrón. 2015. La interacción humano-computadora en México. Pearson Educación.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaqueline Avellaneda Prado and Luis Daniel Velázquez Bañales. 2021. La apropiación digital para la movilización social: : el hacktivismo, ciberactivismo y la tecnopolítica como prácticas de la resistencia digital. Anuario de Investigación de la Comunicación CONEICCXXVIII (dic. 2021), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.38056/2021aiccXVIII469Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kagonya Awori, Nicola J Bidwell, Tigist Sherwaga Hussan, Satinder Gill, and Silvia Lindtner. 2016. Decolonising technology design. In Proceedings of the first African conference on human computer interaction. 226–228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Philip Barnard, Jon May, David Duke, and David Duce. 2000. Systems, interactions, and macrotheory. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 2(2000), 222–262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Arianna Becerril-García. 2021. Evaluación académica en México: instrumentos, performatividad y mainstream. Cientifica 400(2021), 29–54. http://ri.uaemex.mx/handle/20.500.11799/112501Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cindy M Bird. 2005. How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative inquiry 11, 2 (2005), 226–248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Orlando Fals Borda. 1988. Knowledge and peoples power. New York, NY: New Horizons(1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Julie-Anne Boudreau, Liette Gilbert, and Danielle Labbé. 2016. Uneven state formalization and periurban housing production in Hanoi and Mexico City: Comparative reflections from the global South. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48, 12 (2016), 2383–2401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2014. What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?, 26152 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health 11, 4 (2019), 589–597.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heloisa Candello, Adriana S Vivacqua, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Laura Sanely Gaytán-Lugo, and Adriana Alvarado Garcia. 2022. ‘SIGuiendo’ Each Other Steps. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 165, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3516404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Estella Carpi. 2019. No one wants to be the “Global North”? On being a researcher across the North and South. https://mabisir.wordpress.com/2019/05/09/no-one-wants-to-be-the-global-north-on-being-a-researcher-across-the-north-and-south-may-2019/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Luis A. Castro, Laura S. Gaytán-Lugo, Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla, Valeria Herskovic, and Elba del C. Valderrama Bahamondez. 2021. Human computer-interaction in Latin America. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 25, 2 (2021), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01550-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Luis A Castro and Marcela D Rodríguez. 2018. Interacción Humano-Computadora y Aplicaciones en México.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Luis A. Castro, Monica Tenori, Franceli L. Cibrian Robles, and Dagoberto Cruz-Sandoval. 2017. Pervasive Computing-Binational. https://sites.google.com/view/sspci17/home?authuser=0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gayatri Chakravorty. 1999. Spivak” Can the subaltern speak?”. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Thematic Analysis (2021), 1–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. César A. Collazos, Manuel Ortega, Antoni Granollers, Cristian Rusu, and Francisco L. Gutierrez. 2016. Human-Computer Interaction in Ibero-America: Academic, Research, and Professional Issues. IT Professional 18, 2 (2016), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.38Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. 2018. Un mundo ch’ixi es posible. Ensayos desde un presente em crisis. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ivan da Costa Marques. 2015. History of computing in Latin America [Guest editors’ introduction]. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 37, 4 (2015), 10–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Boaventura de Sousa Santos. 2015. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, M. Cecilia C. Baranauskas, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marcelo S. Pimenta. 2008. HCI in Brazil: Lessons Learned and New Perspectives. In Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil) (IHC ’08). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, BRA, 358–359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Êrica Peters do Carmo, Ediana da Silva de Souza, Arthur Felipe Herdt Schuelter, Milene Selbach Silveira, Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Rebeca Schroeder, and Isabela Gasparini. 2021. Panorama sobre Participação das Mulheres no IHC. In Anais do XV Women in Information Technology. SBC, 151–160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Enrique Dussel. 1981. A history of the church in Latin America: colonialism to liberation (1492-1979). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Michaelanne Dye, David Nemer, Josiah Mangiameli, Amy S Bruckman, and Neha Kumar. 2018. El Paquete Semanal: The Week’s Internet in Havana. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse. In Designs for the Pluriverse. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bernardo Mançano Fernandes. 2020. Peasant Movements in Latin America. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Institute for Scientific Information. 2021. Latin America : South and Central America, Mexico and the Caribbean.  . Clarivate. https://clarivate.com/lp/latin-america-south-and-central-america-mexico-and-the-caribbean/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Thiago Cardoso Franco, Massimo Di Felice, and Eliete da Silva Pereira. 2020. O net-ativismo indígena na Amazônia, em contextos pandêmicos. Estudos em Comunicação31 (2020), 109–132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulo Freire. 2014. Educação como prática da liberdade. Editora Paz e Terra.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Lozano Rubello Gabriela. 2019. Los estudios de género en la UBA y la UNAM: una conquista del feminismo académico. Universidades81(2019), 45–54. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/373/37361142006/html/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabine Geldof and Joannes Vandermeulen. 2007. A practitioner’s view of human–computer interaction research and practice. Artifact 1, 3 (2007), 134–141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Llanes Ortiz Gener. 2020. Apropiarse de las Redes para Fortalecer la Palabra Una introducción al Activismo digital de lenguas indígenas en América Latina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Masitah Ghazali, Eunice Sari, and Adi Tedjasaputra. 2022. Asian CHI Symposium: Decolonizing Technology Design in Asia. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 86, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503701Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Cleotilde González, Alfredo Sánchez, and Raquel O. Prates. 1999. Encouraging CHI collaboration in Latin America. In CHI ’99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’99. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 353. https://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Cleotilde González and J. Alfredo Sánchez. [n.d.]. Development consortium: Anyone. anywhere. in Latin America. - ict.udlap.mx. http://ict.udlap.mx/imc/chi2001/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Toni Granollers, César Alberto Collazos, and María Paula González. 2008. The State of HCI in Ibero-American Countries. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 14 (2008), 2599–2613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Toni Granollers, Jaime Muñoz-Arteaga, César A. Collazos, and Huizilopoztli Luna-García. 2020. A year of HCI webinars in Latin America. Interactions 27, 6 (nov 2020), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Francisco J. Gutierrez, Yazmín Magallanes, Laura S. Gaytán-Lugo, Claudia López, and Cleidson R. B. de Souza. 2019. Academic viewpoints and concerns on CSCW education and training in Latin America. In Proceedings of the IX Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3358961.3358971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Sandra Harding. 2016. Latin American decolonial social studies of scientific knowledge: Alliances and tensions. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, 6 (2016), 1063–1087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Pranjal Jain, Anirudh Nagraj, Kartik Joshi, Taru Jain, Sayan Sarcar, Sayan Sarcarbcu, Uk, Nova Ahmed, and Dilrukshi Gamage. 2022. HCI Knowledge Dissemination in South Asia through both Coursework and Community Engagement.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 2011. INTERACTING WITH PUBLIC POLICY Are HCI Researchers an Endangered Species in Brazil?Interactions 18, 3 (may 2011), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/1962438.1962454Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Jesper Kjeldskov and Connor Graham. 2003. A review of mobile HCI research methods. In International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 317–335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Davi Kopenawa. 2013. The falling sky. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Ailton Krenak. 2020. Ideas to Postpone the End of the World. House of Anansi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Aarathi Krishnan, Abbijae Nevers, AJung Moon, Alexia Halvorsen, Angie Abdilla, Beatriz Busaniche, Caitlin Kraft-Buchman, Carlos Affonso Souza, Chelle Adamson, Chennel Williams, Clarissa Guevara, Eileen M. Lach, Farah Ghazal, Ivana Feldfeber, Ivonne Muñoz, Jaime Gutiérrez Alfaro, Jennifer Taylor, Jessica Fjeld, Joan López, John C. Havens, Juliana Guerra, Kruskaya Hidalgo Cordero, Laura Ación, Laura Alonso Alemany, Laura Castro, Lucía González, Luciana Benotti, Malavika Jayaram, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Mariel Zasso, Matías Bordone, Monique Morrow, Nagla Rizk, Norma Elva Chávez, Paola Ricaurte, Rachel Adams, Raja Chatila, Raquel Sevilla, Ravit Dotan, Raziye Buse Cetin, Sabelo Mhlambi, Saiph Savage, Sara Jordan, Sarita Rosenstock, Sofía Scasserra, Sofía Trejo, Soraj Hongladaron, Tajééw Díaz Robles, Tatiana Revilla, Virginia Brussa, Wanda Muñoz Jaime, Yásnaya Elen Aguilar Gil, and Yasmín Quiroga. 2022. INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL FEMINISTA Hacia una Agenda de Investigación para América Latina y El Caribe(1 ed.). Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Neha Kumar. 2021. Braving citational justice within HCI. https://nehakumar.medium.com/braving-citational-justice-within-hci-5b43c1436fbcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Neha Kumar and Nicola Dell. 2018. Towards informed practice in HCI for development. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Neha Kumar, Susan Dray, Andy Dearden, Nicola Dell, Melissa Densmore, Rebecca E. Grinter, Zhengjie Liu, Mario A. Moreno Rocha, Anicia Peters, Eunice Sari, William Thies, Indrani Medhi-Thies, William D. Tucker, Elba Valderrama Bahamondez, and Susan Wyche. 2016. Development Consortium: HCI Across Borders. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3620–3627. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856507Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Neha Kumar, Naveena Karusala, Azra Ismail, Marisol Wong-Villacres, and Aditya Vishwanath. 2019. Engaging feminist solidarity for comparative research, design, and practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Marisol De La Cadena. 2001. Reconstructing race: Racism, culture and mestizaje in Latin America. NACLA Report on the Americas 34, 6 (2001), 16–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Jonathan Lazar, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Jeremy Barksdale, Batya Friedman, Jens Grossklags, Jan Gulliksen, Jeff Johnson, Tom McEwan, Loïc Martínez-Normand, Wibke Michalk, Janice Tsai, Gerrit van der Veer, Hans von Axelson, Ake Walldius, Gill Whitney, Marco Winckler, Volker Wulf, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Lorrie Cranor, Janet Davis, Alan Hedge, Harry Hochheiser, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Clayton Lewis, Lisa Nathan, Fabio Paterno, Blake Reid, Whitney Quesenbery, Ted Selker, and Brian Wentz. 2016. Human–Computer Interaction and International Public Policymaking: A Framework for Understanding and Taking Future Actions. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9, 2 (may 2016), 69–149. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000062Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Shaimaa Lazem. 2021. HCI Education of Choice: On Becoming Critical and Growing Inclusivity. XRDS 27, 3 (mar 2021), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Shaimaa Lazem, Danilo Giglitto, Makuochi Samuel Nkwo, Hafeni Mthoko, Jessica Upani, and Anicia Peters. 2021. Challenges and paradoxes in decolonising HCI: A critical discussion. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)(2021), 1–38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Calvin A. Liang, Sean A. Munson, and Julie A. Kientz. 2021. Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28, 2, Article 14 (apr 2021), 47 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3443686Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Abraham F. Lowenthal. 2021. Disaggregating Latin America: Diverse Trajectories, Emerging Clusters and their Implications. Retrieved Dec 12, 2022 from https://www.brookings.edu/research/disaggregating-latin-america-diverse-trajectories-emerging-clusters-and-their-implications/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Huizilopoztli Luna-García, Cesar A. Collazos, Jaime Muñoz-Arteaga, and Antoni Granollers. 2021. HCI-Collab: Collaborative Network Supporting HCI Education in Iberoamerican Countries. In Proceedings of EduCHI 2021. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://educhi2021.hcilivingcurriculum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/educhi2021-final92.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Khalid Majrashi and Areej Al-Wabil. 2018. HCI Practices in Software-Development Environments in Saudi Arabia. In Cross-Cultural Design. Methods, Tools, and Users, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 58–77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Ivan da Costa Marques. 2015. History of Computing in Latin America [Guest editors’ introduction]. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 37, 4 (2015), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2015.78Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. José G Merquior. 1991. The Other West: on the historical position of Latin America. International Sociology 6, 2 (1991), 149–163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Chandra Talpade Mohanty. 2003. Feminism without borders. In Feminism without Borders. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Chandra Talpade Mohanty. 2020. “Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity Through Anticapitalist Struggles. In Feminist Theory Reader. Routledge, 291–302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Mario Alberto Moreno Rocha. 2001. Adding Human Computer Interaction Studies into the Informatics and Computing Engineering Bachelor Degrees in Latin America. In CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington) (CHI EA ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. José C Moya. 2010. Introduction: Latin America—The Limitations and Meaning of A Historical Category. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Omar Mubin, Fady Alnajjar, and Mudassar Arsalan. 2022. HCI Research in the Middle East and North Africa: A Bibliometric and Socioeconomic Overview. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 38, 16(2022), 1546–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2004701 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2004701Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Jaime Muñoz Arteaga, Héctor Cardona Reyes, César A. Collazos Ordóñez, and Juan Manuel González-Calleros. 2016. Producer–Consumer Model of a Textbook for the Community of Human–Computer Interaction in Latin America. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje 11, 1(2016), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2016.2518442Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. José Abdelnour Nocera, Torkil Clemmensen, Anirudha Joshi, Zhengjie Liu, Judy van Biljon, Xiangang Qin, Isabela Gasparini, and Leonardo Parra-Agudelo. 2021. Geopolitical issues in human computer interaction. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 536–541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Abiodun Afolayan Ogunyemi, David Lamas, Emmanuel Rotimi Adagunodo, Fernando Loizides, and Isaias Barreto Da Rosa. 2016. Theory, Practice and Policy: An Inquiry into the Uptake of HCI Practices in the Software Industry of a Developing Country. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 32, 9(2016), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1186306 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1186306Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Paz Pena and Joana Varon. [n.d.]. Inteligencia Artificial opresiva: categorías feministas para entender sus efectos políticos. ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Raquel O. Prates, Simone Barbosa, Milene S. da Silveira, Clarisse S. de Souza, Cecília Baranauskas, Cristiano Maciel, Elizabeth Furtado, Junia Anacleto, Paulo Melo, and Tuomo Kujala. 2013. HCI community in Brazil—sweet 16!Interactions 20, 6 (nov 2013), 80–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2530983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Christian Remy, Silke Gegenbauer, and Elaine M Huang. 2015. Bridging the theory-practice gap: Lessons and challenges of applying the attachment framework for sustainable hci design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1305–1314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Claudia Grisales, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Bibiana Serpa, Julian Iñaki Goñi, and Oscar A Lemus. 2022. Reviews Gone South: A Subversive Experiment on Participatory Design Canons: Dedicated to the Memory of Oscar A. Lemus. In Participatory Design Conference 2022: Volume 1. 206–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Paola Ricaurte. 2019. Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media 20, 4 (2019), 350–365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Yvonne Rogers. 2012. HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics 5, 2(2012), 1–129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Justo Antonio Rojas Rojas, Marlene Jaramillo Argandoña, Yosbel Lazo Roger, and Xenia Pedraza Gónzalez. 2021. LA EVALUACIÓN DE LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA DEL PROFESOR UNIVERSITARIO ECUATORIANO, UNA NUEVA PERSPECTIVA. TLATEMOANI Revista Académica de Investigación 37 (aug 2021), 156–175. https://www.eumed.net/es/revistas/tlatemoani/ano-12-numero-37-agosto-2021/produccion-cientifica-profesorGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Diego Ricardo Salazar Armijos, Diego Eduardo Benavides Astudillo, Alberto Daniel Núñez Agurto, Margoth Elisa Guaraca Moyota, Verónica Isabel Martínez Cepeda, and Milton Temístocles Andrade Salazar. 2019. Tecnologías de información y comunicación para fortalecer el aprendizaje del tsa’fiki en unidades educativas tsa’chilas. Revista Universidad y Sociedad 11, 5 (2019), 162–170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Briane Paul V. Samson, Suleman Shahid, Akihiro Matsufuji, Chat Wacharamanotham, Toni-Jan Keith P. Monserrat, Keyur Sorathia, Masitah Ghazali, Shio Miyafuji, Nova Ahmed, Kazuyuki Fujita, A. B. M. Alim Al Islam, Eunice Sari, Murni Mahmud, Adi Tedjasaputra, Juho Kim, Uichin Lee, Thippaya Chintakovid, Sheng-Ming Wang, Zhengjie Liu, Xiangmin Fan, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Simon Tangi Perrault, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2020. Asian CHI Symposium: HCI Research from Asia and on Asian Contexts and Cultures. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla, Luis A. Castro, Monica Tentori, Mario A. Moreno Rocha, and Marcela D. Rodríguez. 2017. CHI-Mexico: ten years of the Mexican Conference on HCI. Interactions 24, 6 (oct 2017), 86–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/3145627Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Heidy Sarabia. 2019. Citizenship in the Global South: Policing Irregular Migrants and Eroding Citizenship Rights in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives 46, 6 (2019), 42–55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. SIGCHI. [n.d.]. Gary Marsden travel awards. https://sigchi.org/awards/gary-marsden-travel-awards/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Rachel Charlotte Smith, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Daria Loi, Rogério Abreu de Paula, Asnath Paula Kambunga, Marly Muudeni Samuel, and Tariq Zaman. 2021. Decolonizing Design Practices: Towards Pluriversality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 83, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3441334Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Irene Soria Guzmán, Fernanda Briones Medina, Eurídice Cabañes Martínez, Alejandro Miranda, José María Serralde Ruiz, and Gunnar Wolf. 2016. Ética hacker, seguridad y vigilanciae(1 ed.). Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Caroline Stratton and David Nemer. 2020. ICTD Research in Latin America: literature review, scholar feedback, and recommendations. Information Technology for Development 26, 4 (2020), 692–710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Lucy A Suchman. 2002. Practice-based design of information systems: Notes from the hyperdeveloped world. The information society 18, 2 (2002), 139–144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Monica Tentori, Artur Ziviani, Débora C Muchaluat-Saade, and Jesus Favela. 2020. Digital healthcare in Latin America: the case of Brazil and Mexico. Commun. ACM 63, 11 (2020), 72–77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. The Citational Justice Collective, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Sareeta Amrute, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Nicola Bidwell, Tawanna Dillahunt, Laura S. Gaytán-Lugo, Naveena Karusala, Neha Kumar, Rigoberto Lara Guzmán, Maryam Mustafa, Bonnie Nardi, Lisa Nathan, Nassim Parvin, Beth Patin, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Rebecca Rouse, Katta Spiel, Soraia Silva Prietch, Ding Wang, and Marisol Wong-Villacrés. 2022. Citational justice and the politics of knowledge production. Interactions 29, 5 (sep 2022), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3556549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. María del Pilar Trejo Castro. 2018. La construcción de la identidad feminista en espacios digitales a partir de experiencias situadas. Master’s thesis. Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Federico Vasen and Ivonne Lujano Vilchis. 2017. Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 62 (2017), 199–228. Issue 231. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-mexicana-ciencias-politicas-sociales-92-articulo-sistemas-nacionales-clasificacion-revistas-cientificas-S0185191817300430Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Marcelo Vianna, Lucas de Almeida Pereira, and Colette Perold. 2022. Histórias da informática na América Latina: Reflexões e experiências (Argentina, Brasil e Chile). Paco e Littera.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Peter Samuelson Wardrip, R Benjamin Shapiro, Andrea Forte, Spiro Maroulis, Karen Brennan, and Ricarose Roque. 2013. CSCW and education: viewing education as a site of work practice. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion. 333–336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Alexander Herrera Wassilowsky. 2011. La recuperación de tecnologías indígenas: arqueología, tecnología y desarrollo en los Andes. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Wikipedia. 2022. Latin America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_America#cite_note-13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Joan Williams, Su Li, Roberta Rincon, and Peter Finn. 2016. Climate control: Gender and racial bias in engineering?Available at SSRN 4014946(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus and Nicola J. Bidwell. 2013. Toward an Afro-Centric Indigenous HCI Paradigm. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 29, 4(2013), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.765763 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.765763Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Juan F Maestre, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Heloisa Candello, Marilyn Iriarte, and Carl DiSalvo. 2020. Decolonizing learning spaces for sociotechnical research and design. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 519–526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Laura S. Gaytán-Lugo, Oscar A. Lemus, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, and Monica Perusquía-Hernández. 2021. Lessons from Latin America: Embracing Horizontality to Reconstruct HCI as a Pluriverse. Interactions 28, 2 (mar 2021), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Para Cima y Pa’ Abajo: Building Bridges Between HCI Research in Latin America and in the Global North

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)121
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)121

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!