VR Distance Judgments are Affected by the Amount of Pre-Experiment Blind Walking

ABSTRACT

Many studies have found people can accurately judge distances in the real world while they underestimate distances in virtual reality (VR). This discrepancy negatively impacts some VR applications. Direct blind walking is a popular method of measuring distance judgments where participants view a target and then walk to it while blindfolded. To ensure that participants are comfortable with blindfolded walking, researchers often require participants to practice blind walking beforehand. We call this practice ”pre-experiment blind walking” (PEBW). Few studies report details about their PEBW procedure, and little research has been conducted on how PEBW might affect subsequent distance judgments. This between-participant study varied the amount of the PEBW and had participants perform distance judgments in VR. The results show that a longer PEBW causes less distance underestimation. This work demonstrates the importance of clearly reporting PEBW procedures and suggests that a consistent procedure may be necessary to reliably compare direct blind walking research studies.

References

1. Farahnaz Ahmed, Joseph D Cohen, Katherine S Binder, and Claude L Fennema. 2010. Influence of tactile feedback and presence on egocentric distance perception in virtual environments. In 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR). IEEE, 195–202.
2. Sarah H Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K Stefanucci, William B Thompson, Nathan Nash, and Michael McCardell. 2015. Egocentric distance perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception. 47–50.
3. Fan Ding, Soheil Sepahyar, and Scott Kuhl. 2020. Effects of Brightness on Distance Judgments in Head Mounted Displays. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2020. 1–5.
4. FH Durgin, A Pelah, and S Amiruddin. 1998. Measures of visuomotor adaptation to anomalous optic flow. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 39 (1998), S1094.
5. Frank H Durgin, Adar Pelah, Laura F Fox, Jed Lewis, Rachel Kane, and Katherine A Walley. 2005. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31, 3(2005), 398.
6. Ilja T. Feldstein, Felix M. Kölsch, and Robert Konrad. 2020. Egocentric Distance Perception: A Comparative Study Investigating Differences Between Real and Virtual Environments. Perception 49, 9 (2020), 940–967.
7. Timofey Y Grechkin, Tien Dat Nguyen, Jodie M Plumert, James F Cremer, and Joseph K Kearney. 2010. How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments?ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 7, 4 (2010), 1–18.
8. Jonathan W Kelly, Lucia A Cherep, and Zachary D Siegel. 2017. Perceived space in the HTC Vive. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 15, 1 (2017), 1–16.
9. Scott A Kuhl, William B Thompson, and Sarah H Creem-Regehr. 2009. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 6, 3 (2009), 1–20.
10. Benjamin R Kunz, Leah Wouters, Daniel Smith, William B Thompson, and Sarah H Creem-Regehr. 2009. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 6 (2009), 1284–1293.
11. Bochao Li, Ruimin Zhang, and Scott Kuhl. 2014. Minication affects action-based distance judgments in oculus rift HMDs. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. 91–94.
12. Bochao Li, Ruimin Zhang, Anthony Nordman, and Scott A Kuhl. 2015. The effects of minification and display field of view on distance judgments in real and HMD-based environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception. 55–58.
13. Qiufeng Lin, Xianshi Xie, Aysu Erdemir, Gayathri Narasimham, Timothy P McNamara, John Rieser, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2011. Egocentric distance perception in real and HMD-based virtual environments: The effect of limited scanning method. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 75–82.
14. Jack M Loomis, José A Da Silva, Naofumi Fujita, and Sergio S Fukusima. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 4(1992), 906.
15. Betty J Mohler, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, and William B Thompson. 2006. The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 9–14.
16. Betty J. Mohler, William B. Thompson, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Peter Willemsen, Herbert L. Pick, Jr., and John J. Rieser. 2007a. Calibration of Locomotion Resulting from Visual Motion in a Treadmill-Based Virtual Environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 4, 1 (2007).
17. Betty J Mohler, William B Thompson, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, Peter Willemsen, Herbert L Pick Jr, and John J Rieser. 2007b. Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 4, 1 (2007), 4.
18. John W Philbeck, Adam J Woods, Joeanna Arthur, and Jennifer Todd. 2008. Progressive locomotor recalibration during blind walking. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 8 (2008), 1459–1470.
19. Rebekka S Renner, Boris M Velichkovsky, and Jens R Helmert. 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments-a review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46, 2 (2013), 23.
20. John J Rieser, Herbert L Pick, Daniel H Ashmead, and Anne E Garing. 1995. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 3(1995), 480.
21. Cynthia S. Sahm, Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, William B. Thompson, and Peter Willemsen. 2005a. Throwing Versus Walking as Indicators of Distance Perception in Real and Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 1, 3 (2005), 35–45.
22. Cynthia S Sahm, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, William B Thompson, and Peter Willemsen. 2005b. Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 1 (2005), 35–45.
23. Zachary D Siegel and Jonathan W Kelly. 2017. Walking through a virtual environment improves perceived size within and beyond the walked space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 79, 1 (2017), 39–44.
24. Hannah Marie Solini. 2019. Reevaluating Calibration Transfer of Perturbed Optic Flow to Real-World and Virtual Environments. Ph. D. Dissertation. Clemson University.
25. Hannah M Solini, Ayush Bhargava, and Christopher C Pagano. 2019. Transfer of calibration in virtual reality to both real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 63. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1943–1947.
26. Jessica K Witt, Dennis R Proffitt, and William Epstein. 2004. Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception 33, 5 (2004), 577–590.
27. Mary K Young, Graham B Gaylor, Scott M Andrus, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2014. A comparison of two cost-differentiated virtual reality systems for perception and action tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. 83–90.
28. Ruimin Zhang, Anthony Nordman, James Walker, and Scott A Kuhl. 2012. Minification affects verbal-and action-based distance judgments differently in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 9, 3 (2012), 1–13.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Graphics systems and interfaces

      • Perception

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Virtual reality