skip to main content
10.1145/3561212.3561219acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesamConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Augmented Floor - Assessing Auditory Augmentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Augmented Floor is a wooden floor with in-built PyzoFlex® printed electronics. It measures any change of pressure on its surface. For users walking on this floor, we created an auditory augmentation of their footsteps. Different sound designs were implemented, both realistic and synthetic ones. We developed a method based on envelope reusing and compared it to the triggering of step-sounds. The envelope method shows a higher correlation between the input signal and the playback sound; it was rated better. Besides, realistic sounds were preferred over synthetic ones.

References

  1. Ibrahim Al-Naimi and Chi Biu Wong. 2017. Indoor human detection and tracking using advanced smart floor. In 2017 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). IEEE, 34–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Stephen Barrass and Tim Barrass. 2013. Embedding sonifications in things. In Proc. of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD). Proc. of the ICAD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Till Bovermann, René Tünnermann, and Thomas Hermann. 2012. Auditory augmentation. In Innovative Applications of Ambient Intelligence: Advances in Smart Systems. IGI Global, 98–112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Perry R Cook. 1997. Physically informed sonic modeling (phism): Synthesis of percussive sounds. Computer Music Journal 21, 3 (1997), 38–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Guodong Feng, Jiechao Mai, Zhen Ban, Xuemei Guo, and Guoli Wang. 2016. Floor pressure imaging for fall detection with fiber-optic sensors. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 2 (2016), 40–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sam Ferguson. 2013. Sonifying every day: Activating everyday interactions for ambient sonification systems. Proc. of the ICAD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Katharina Groß-Vogt, Marian Weger, and Robert Höldrich. 2018. Exploration of Auditory Augmentation in an Interdisciplinary Prototyping Workshop. In FMT. 10–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Katharina Groß-Vogt, Marian Weger, Robert Höldrich, Thomas Hermann, Till Bovermann, and Stefan Reichmann. 2018. Augmentation of an institute’s kitchen: An ambient auditory display of electric power consumption. Proc. of the ICAD.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Robert H Jack, Adib Mehrabi, Tony Stockman, and Andrew McPherson. 2018. Action-sound latency and the perceived quality of digital musical instruments: Comparing professional percussionists and amateur musicians. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 36, 1 (2018), 109–128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bryan J Kemp. 1973. Reaction time of young and elderly subjects in relation to perceptual deprivation and signal-on versus signal-off conditions.Developmental Psychology 8, 2 (1973), 268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Justyna Maculewicz, Cumhur Erkut, and Stefania Serafin. 2016. An investigation on the impact of auditory and haptic feedback on rhythmic walking interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 85 (2016), 40–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Paul Marshall, Alissa Antle, Elise Van Den Hoven, and Yvonne Rogers. 2013. Introduction to the special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design., 3 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Abu Zaher Md Faridee, Sreenivasan Ramasamy Ramamurthy, and Nirmalya Roy. 2019. Happyfeet: Challenges in building an automated dance recognition and assessment tool. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 22, 3(2019), 10–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Zachary Pousman and John Stasko. 2006. A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. 67–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Barbara Stadlober, Martin Zirkl, and Mihai Irimia-Vladu. 2019. Route towards sustainable smart sensors: ferroelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-based materials and their integration in flexible electronics. Chemical Society Reviews 48, 6 (2019), 1787–1825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. F Stevens, D Murphy, and S Smith. 2016. Emotion and soundscape preference rating: using semantic differential pairs and the self-assessment manikin. In Sound and Music Computing conference, Hamburg, Vol. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Joseph Newbold, Linge Zhang, Patricia Rick, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2019. As light as you aspire to be: changing body perception with sound to support physical activity. (2019), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Luca Turchet, Stefania Serafin, Smilen Dimitrov, and Rolf Nordahl. 2010. Physically based sound synthesis and control of footsteps sounds. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-10). 161–168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I.; Höldrich R. Weger, M.; SvoronosKanavas. 2022. Schrödinger’s Box: an artifact to study the limits of plausibility in auditory augmentations.To be published at: Audio Mostly(2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin Zirkl, G. Scheipl, Barbara Stadlober, Christian Rendl, P Greindl, Michael Haller, and P Hartmann. 2013. Pyzo Flex ®: A printed piezoelectric pressure sensing foil for human machine interfaces. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 8831. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2025235Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AM '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference
    September 2022
    245 pages
    ISBN:9781450397018
    DOI:10.1145/3561212

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate148of226submissions,65%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format