skip to main content
research-article

Working With AI to Persuade: Examining a Large Language Model's Ability to Generate Pro-Vaccination Messages

Published: 16 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a transformative force in communication and messaging strategy, with potential to disrupt traditional approaches. Large language models (LLMs), a form of AI, are capable of generating high-quality, humanlike text. We investigate the persuasive quality of AI-generated messages to understand how AI could impact public health messaging. Specifically, through a series of studies designed to characterize and evaluate generative AI in developing public health messages, we analyze COVID-19 pro-vaccination messages generated by GPT-3, a state-of-the-art instantiation of a large language model. Study 1 is a systematic evaluation of GPT-3's ability to generate pro-vaccination messages. Study 2 then observed peoples' perceptions of curated GPT-3-generated messages compared to human-authored messages released by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), finding that GPT-3 messages were perceived as more effective, stronger arguments, and evoked more positive attitudes than CDC messages. Finally, Study 3 assessed the role of source labels on perceived quality, finding that while participants preferred AI-generated messages, they expressed dispreference for messages that were labeled as AI-generated. The results suggest that, with human supervision, AI can be used to create effective public health messages, but that individuals prefer their public health messages to come from human institutions rather than AI sources. We propose best practices for assessing generative outputs of large language models in future social science research and ways health professionals can use AI systems to augment public health messaging.

References

[1]
Abubakar Abid, Maheen Farooqi, and James Zou. 2021. Large language models associate Muslims with violence. Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 3, 6 (2021), 461--463.
[2]
Sam Addison Ankenbauer and Alex Jiahong Lu. 2021. Navigating the ?Glimmer of Hope": Challenges and Resilience among US Older Adults in Seeking COVID-19 Vaccination. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 10--13.
[3]
Kenneth C Arnold, April M Volzer, and Noah G Madrid. 2021. Generative Models can Help Writers without Writing for Them. In IUI Workshops.
[4]
Robert A Bell, Matthew S McGlone, and Marko Dragojevic. 2014. Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy. Journal of health communication, Vol. 19, 10 (2014), 1178--1195.
[5]
Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, et al. 2021. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 (2021).
[6]
Anne Bowser, Katie Shilton, Jenny Preece, and Elizabeth Warrick. 2017. Accounting for privacy in citizen science: Ethical research in a context of openness. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2124--2136.
[7]
Thorsten Brants, Ashok C Popat, Peng Xu, Franz J Och, and Jeffrey Dean. 2007. Large language models in machine translation. (2007).
[8]
Tom B Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165 (2020).
[9]
Ben Buchanan, Andrew Lohn, Micah Musser, and Katerina Sedova. 2021. Truth, Lies, and Automation. (2021).
[10]
Alex Calderwood, Vivian Qiu, Katy Ilonka Gero, and Lydia B Chilton. 2020. How Novelists Use Generative Language Models: An Exploratory User Study. In HAI-GEN user2agent@ IUI.
[11]
Stevie Chancellor, Jessica Annette Pater, Trustin Clear, Eric Gilbert, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. # thyghgapp: Instagram content moderation and lexical variation in pro-eating disorder communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. 1201--1213.
[12]
Elizabeth Clark, Tal August, Sofia Serrano, Nikita Haduong, Suchin Gururangan, and Noah A Smith. 2021. All That's' Human'Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00061 (2021).
[13]
Scott Counts, Munmun De Choudhury, Jana Diesner, Eric Gilbert, Marta Gonzalez, Brian Keegan, Mor Naaman, and Hanna Wallach. 2014. Computational social science: Cscw in the social media era. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 105--108.
[14]
Thomas Davenport and Ravi Kalakota. 2019. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future healthcare journal, Vol. 6, 2 (2019), 94.
[15]
Ashok Deb, Anuja Majmundar, Sungyong Seo, Akira Matsui, Rajat Tandon, Shen Yan, Jon-Patrick Allem, and Emilio Ferrara. 2018. Social bots for online public health interventions. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 1--4.
[16]
Michael A Devito, Ashley Marie Walker, Jeremy Birnholtz, Kathryn Ringland, Kathryn Macapagal, Ashley Kraus, Sean Munson, Calvin Liang, and Herman Saksono. 2019. Social technologies for digital wellbeing among marginalized communities. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 449--454.
[17]
Mark Diaz. 2019. Algorithmic Technologies and Underrepresented Populations. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 47--51.
[18]
Amiel A Dror, Netanel Eisenbach, Shahar Taiber, Nicole G Morozov, Matti Mizrachi, Asaf Zigron, Samer Srouji, and Eyal Sela. 2020. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. European journal of epidemiology, Vol. 35, 8 (2020), 775--779.
[19]
Sebastian Duerr and Peter A Gloor. 2021. Persuasive Natural Language Generation--A Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.05786 (2021).
[20]
The Economist. [n.,d.]. A New AI Language Model Generates Poetry and Prose. https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2020/08/06/a-new-ai-language-model-generates-poetry-and-prose.
[21]
J Richard Eiser and Camilla J White. 1974. Evaluative consistency and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 30, 3 (1974), 349.
[22]
Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh. 2020. Use of AI-based tools for healthcare purposes: a survey study from consumers' perspectives. BMC medical informatics and decision making, Vol. 20, 1 (2020), 1--19.
[23]
Jim AC Everett, Clara Colombatto, Vladimir Chituc, William J Brady, and Molly Crockett. 2020. The effectiveness of moral messages on public health behavioral intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2020).
[24]
Matthew C Farrelly, James Nonnemaker, Kevin C Davis, and Altijani Hussin. 2009. The influence of the national truth® campaign on smoking initiation. American journal of preventive medicine, Vol. 36, 5 (2009), 379--384.
[25]
Luciano Floridi and Massimo Chiriatti. 2020. GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, Vol. 30, 4 (2020), 681--694.
[26]
Brian J Fogg. 1998. Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 225--232.
[27]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [n.,d.]. Workplace Health in America 2017.
[28]
Karen Freberg, Kristin Saling, Kathleen G Vidoloff, and Gina Eosco. 2013. Using value modeling to evaluate social media messages: The case of Hurricane Irene. Public Relations Review, Vol. 39, 3 (2013), 185--192.
[29]
Ilona Fridman, Nicole Lucas, Debra Henke, and Christina K Zigler. 2020. Association between public knowledge about COVID-19, trust in information sources, and adherence to social distancing: cross-sectional survey. JMIR public health and surveillance, Vol. 6, 3 (2020), e22060.
[30]
CARY Funk and JOHN Gramlich. 2021. 10 facts about Americans and coronavirus vaccines. Pew Research Center (2021).
[31]
Susanne Gaube, Harini Suresh, Martina Raue, Alexander Merritt, Seth J Berkowitz, Eva Lermer, Joseph F Coughlin, John V Guttag, Errol Colak, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2021. Do as AI say: susceptibility in deployment of clinical decision-aids. NPJ digital medicine, Vol. 4, 1 (2021), 1--8.
[32]
Marzyeh Ghassemi, Luke Oakden-Rayner, and Andrew L Beam. 2021. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, Vol. 3, 11 (2021), e745--e750.
[33]
Mitchell L Gordon, Michelle S Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel, Jeff Hancock, Tatsunori Hashimoto, and Michael S Bernstein. 2022. Jury learning: Integrating dissenting voices into machine learning models. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--19.
[34]
Ben Green and Yiling Chen. 2019. Disparate interactions: An algorithm-in-the-loop analysis of fairness in risk assessments. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 90--99.
[35]
Ivan Habernal and Iryna Gurevych. 2016. Which argument is more convincing? analyzing and predicting convincingness of web arguments using bidirectional lstm. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 1589--1599.
[36]
Jeffrey T Hancock, Mor Naaman, and Karen Levy. 2020. AI-mediated communication: definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 25, 1 (2020), 89--100.
[37]
Will Douglas Heaven. 2020. OpenAI's new language generator GPT-3 is shockingly good-and completely mindless. MIT Technology Review (2020).
[38]
Lennart Hofeditz, Milad Mirbabaie, Stefan Stieglitz, and Jasmin Holstein. 2021. DO YOU TRUST AN AI-JOURNALIST? A CREDIBILITY ANALYSIS OF NEWS CONTENT WITH AI-AUTHORSHIP. (2021).
[39]
Jess Hohenstein and Malte Jung. 2020. AI as a moral crumple zone: The effects of AI-mediated communication on attribution and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 106 (2020), 106190.
[40]
Joo-Wha Hong and Nathaniel Ming Curran. 2019. Artificial intelligence, artists, and art: attitudes toward artwork produced by humans vs. artificial intelligence. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), Vol. 15, 2s (2019), 1--16.
[41]
Li Huang, Zhi Lu, and Priyali Rajagopal. 2022. Numbers, not lives: Ai dehumanization undermines covid-19 preventive intentions. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, Vol. 7, 1 (2022), 63--71.
[42]
Anthony Hunter, Lisa Chalaguine, Tomasz Czernuszenko, Emmanuel Hadoux, and Sylwia Polberg. 2019. Towards computational persuasion via natural language argumentation dialogues. In Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche Intelligenz). Springer, 18--33.
[43]
Maurice Jakesch, Megan French, Xiao Ma, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Mor Naaman. 2019. AI-mediated communication: How the perception that profile text was written by AI affects trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[44]
Tae Woo Kim and Adam Duhachek. 2020. Artificial intelligence and persuasion: A construal-level account. Psychological science, Vol. 31, 4 (2020), 363--380.
[45]
Andy J King and Allison J Lazard. 2020. Advancing visual health communication research to improve infodemic response. Health Communication, Vol. 35, 14 (2020), 1723--1728.
[46]
Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, et al. 2019. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 7 (2019), 453--466.
[47]
Mary E Laffidy. 2021. Governments' Use of Fear Appeals and Accessible Language in COVID-19 Outreach: Comparing Florida and New York's Messages, March 2020--September 2020. Ph.,D. Dissertation. Northern Arizona University.
[48]
Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Q Vera Liao, Alison Smith-Renner, and Chenhao Tan. 2021. Towards a science of human-ai decision making: a survey of empirical studies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11471 (2021).
[49]
Min Kyung Lee and Su Baykal. 2017. Algorithmic mediation in group decisions: Fairness perceptions of algorithmically mediated vs. discussion-based social division. In Proceedings of the 2017 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1035--1048.
[50]
Sangwon Lee, Seungahn Nah, Deborah S Chung, and Junghwan Kim. 2020. Predicting ai news credibility: communicative or social capital or both? Communication Studies, Vol. 71, 3 (2020), 428--447.
[51]
Stephan Lewandowsky and Anastasia Kozyreva. 2022. Algorithms, lies, and social media. https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/04/algorithms-lies-and-social-media/.
[52]
Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt"aschel, et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11401 (2020).
[53]
Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2021. TruthfulQA: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958 (2021).
[54]
Pengfei Liu, Weizhe Yuan, Jinlan Fu, Zhengbao Jiang, Hiroaki Hayashi, and Graham Neubig. 2021. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13586 (2021).
[55]
Edward W Maibach and Roxanne Parrott. 1995. Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice. Sage.
[56]
Cade Metz. [n.,d.]. Meet GPT-3. It Has Learned to Code (and Blog and Argue).
[57]
Hannah Mieczkowski, Jeffrey T Hancock, Mor Naaman, Malte Jung, and Jess Hohenstein. 2021. AI-Mediated Communication: Language Use and Interpersonal Effects in a Referential Communication Task. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--14.
[58]
Marie-Francine Moens. 2018. Argumentation mining: How can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge? Argument & Computation, Vol. 9, 1 (2018), 1--14.
[59]
Thomas Moore. [n.,d.]. HHS plans mega $250m 'defeat despair' COVID-19 campaign.
[60]
Xiaoli Nan, Irina A Iles, Bo Yang, and Zexin Ma. 2022. Public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Lessons from communication science. Health Communication, Vol. 37, 1 (2022), 1--19.
[61]
Krista Neher. [n.,d.]. How To Create A Digital Marketing Strategy: Eight Steps To Laser Focus Your Plan.
[62]
Kimberly H Nguyen, David Yankey, Kelsey C Coy, Kathryn A Brookmeyer, Neetu Abad, Rebecca Guerin, Girija Syamlal, Peng-jun Lu, Brittney N Baack, Hilda Razzaghi, et al. 2021. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage, Intent, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs among Essential Workers, United States. Emerging infectious diseases, Vol. 27, 11 (2021), 2908.
[63]
Jeff Niederdeppe, Matthew C Farrelly, James Nonnemaker, Kevin C Davis, and Lauren Wagner. 2011. Socioeconomic variation in recall and perceived effectiveness of campaign advertisements to promote smoking cessation. Social science & medicine, Vol. 72, 5 (2011), 773--780.
[64]
Fayika Farhat Nova, Pratyasha Saha, Md Shafiur Raihan Shafi, and Shion Guha. 2019. Sharing Of Public Harassment Experiences on Social Media in Bangladesh. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 324--329.
[65]
Tennessee Department of Health. 2021. Vaccine Messaging Market Survey Executive Summary Reports. https://www.tn.gov/health/news/2021/4/14/market-study-explores-tennessean-s-perspectives-on-covid-19-vaccine.html.
[66]
Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the association for Information Systems, Vol. 24, 1 (2009), 28.
[67]
World Health Organization. [n.,d.]. Who principles for effective communications. https://www.who.int/about/communications/principles.
[68]
Kirsten Ostherr. 2020. Artificial intelligence and medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities (2020), 1--22.
[69]
Sun Young Park, Pei-Yi Kuo, Andrea Barbarin, Elizabeth Kaziunas, Astrid Chow, Karandeep Singh, Lauren Wilcox, and Walter S Lasecki. 2019. Identifying challenges and opportunities in human-AI collaboration in healthcare. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 506--510.
[70]
Jessica A Pater, Oliver L Haimson, Nazanin Andalibi, and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2016. ?Hunger Hurts but Starving Works" Characterizing the Presentation of Eating Disorders Online. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1185--1200.
[71]
Richard E Petty, Jamie Barden, and S Christian Wheeler. 2009. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion: Developing health promotions for sustained behavioral change. (2009).
[72]
Ashley Pilipiszyn. 2021. GPT-3 powers the next generation of apps. https://openai.com/blog/gpt-3-apps/.
[73]
Jane Pirkis, Alyssia Rossetto, Angela Nicholas, Maria Ftanou, Jo Robinson, and Nicola Reavley. 2019. Suicide prevention media campaigns: a systematic literature review. Health communication, Vol. 34, 4 (2019), 402--414.
[74]
Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Dario Amodei, Daniela Amodei, Jack Clark, Miles Brundage, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Better language models and their implications. OpenAI Blog https://openai. com/blog/better-language-models.
[75]
Jack W Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al. 2021. Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446 (2021).
[76]
Melissa Roemmele and Andrew S Gordon. 2018. Automated assistance for creative writing with an rnn language model. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion. 1--2.
[77]
Malik Sallam. 2021. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccines, Vol. 9, 2 (2021), 160.
[78]
Charles Harold Sandage and Vernon Fryburger. 1989. Advertising Theory and Practice. (1989).
[79]
Shaunak Sastry and Alessandro Lovari. 2017. Communicating the ontological narrative of Ebola: An emerging disease in the time of "epidemic 2.0". Health communication, Vol. 32, 3 (2017), 329--338.
[80]
Jakob Schoeffer and Niklas Kuehl. 2021. Appropriate fairness perceptions? On the effectiveness of explanations in enabling people to assess the fairness of automated decision systems. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 153--157.
[81]
Kavya Sekar. 2020. Funding for COVID-19 Vaccines: An Overview.
[82]
Bryan C Semaan, Scott P Robertson, Sara Douglas, and Misa Maruyama. 2014. Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 1409--1421.
[83]
Donghee Shin. 2021. How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources? AI & SOCIETY (2021), 1--16.
[84]
Donghoon Shin, Subeen Park, Esther Hehsun Kim, Soomin Kim, Jinwook Seo, and Hwajung Hong. 2022. Exploring the Effects of AI-assisted Emotional Support Processes in Online Mental Health Community. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1--7.
[85]
Keng Siau and Weiyu Wang. 2018. Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Cutter business technology journal, Vol. 31, 2 (2018), 47--53.
[86]
Michael D Slater and June A Flora. 1991. Health lifestyles: Audience segmentation analysis for public health interventions. Health education quarterly, Vol. 18, 2 (1991), 221--233.
[87]
Hyeonjin Soh. 2006. Measuring trust in advertising. Ph.,D. Dissertation. uga.
[88]
Patric R Spence, Chad Edwards, Autumn Edwards, Adam Rainear, and Xianlin Jin. 2021. ?They're always wrong anyway": exploring differences of credibility, attraction, and behavioral intentions in professional, amateur, and robotic-delivered weather forecasts. Communication Quarterly, Vol. 69, 1 (2021), 67--86.
[89]
Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology, Vol. 29, 1 (2010), 24--54.
[90]
Marianne Udow-Phillips and Paula M Lantz. 2020. Trust in public health is essential amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 15, 7 (2020), 431--433.
[91]
Chris van der Lee, Albert Gatt, Emiel van Miltenburg, and Emiel Krahmer. 2021. Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines. Computer Speech & Language, Vol. 67 (2021), 101151.
[92]
Xuewei Wang, Weiyan Shi, Richard Kim, Yoojung Oh, Sijia Yang, Jingwen Zhang, and Zhou Yu. 2019. Persuasion for good: Towards a personalized persuasive dialogue system for social good. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06725 (2019).
[93]
Morton Wiener and Albert Mehrabian. 1968. Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. Ardent Media.
[94]
Ben Young, Sarah Lewis, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Linda Bauld, Martine Stead, Kathryn Angus, Mhairi Campbell, Shona Hilton, James Thomas, Kate Hinds, et al. 2018. Effectiveness of mass media campaigns to reduce alcohol consumption and harm: a systematic review. Alcohol and alcoholism, Vol. 53, 3 (2018), 302--316.
[95]
Xiaoquan Zhao, Andrew Strasser, Joseph N Cappella, Caryn Lerman, and Martin Fishbein. 2011. A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity. Communication methods and measures, Vol. 5, 1 (2011), 48--75.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Information that mattersInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103380193:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Scientific Collaboration: Insights from Students and Educational ImplicationsEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1410113214:10(1132)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The application of OpenAI Technology in Marketing Activities - A Systematic Literature ReviewJournal of Modern Science10.13166/jms/19701660:6(392-410)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Working With AI to Persuade: Examining a Large Language Model's Ability to Generate Pro-Vaccination Messages

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    April 2023
    3836 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3593053
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2023
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. AI-mediated communication
    2. large language models
    3. message factors
    4. natural language processing
    5. persuasion
    6. public health messaging

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • NSF

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,359
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)115
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Information that mattersInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103380193:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
    • (2024)Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Scientific Collaboration: Insights from Students and Educational ImplicationsEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1410113214:10(1132)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The application of OpenAI Technology in Marketing Activities - A Systematic Literature ReviewJournal of Modern Science10.13166/jms/19701660:6(392-410)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Effectiveness of a culturally tailored text messaging program for promoting cervical cancer screening in accra, Ghana: a quasi-experimental trialBMC Women's Health10.1186/s12905-023-02867-224:1Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Evaluation of an LLM in Identifying Logical Fallacies: A Call for Rigor When Adopting LLMs in HCI ResearchCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681867(303-308)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
    • (2024)What you see, What you get? Mapping Inconsistencies of Sustainability Judgements among Experts and ConsumersProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3677525.3678695(443-452)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
    • (2024)On LLM Wizards: Identifying Large Language Models' Behaviors for Wizard of Oz ExperimentsProceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3652988.3673967(1-11)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
    • (2024)In Whose Voice?: Examining AI Agent Representation of People in Social Interaction through Generative SpeechProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661555(224-245)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Visibility into AI AgentsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658948(958-973)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Sustaining Scalable Sustainability: Human-Centered Green Technology for Community-wide Carbon ReductionExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636314(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media