10.1145/358916.359005acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedings
ARTICLE

How does radical collocation help a team succeed?

ABSTRACT

Companies are experimenting with putting teams into warrooms, hoping for some productivity enhancement. We conducted a field study of six such teams, tracking their activity, attitudes, use of technology and productivity. Teams in these warrooms showed a doubling of productivity. Why? Among other things, teams had easy access to each other for both coordination of their work and for learning, and the work artifacts they posted on the walls remained visible to all. These results imply that if we are to truly support remote teams, we should provide constant awareness and easy transitions in and out of spontaneous meetings.

References

  1. 1.Albrecht,A.,and Gaffney,J.(1983)"Software Function, Source Lines of code,and Development Effort Prediction: A Software Science Validation,"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering ,(SE-9:6),Nove ber,pp.639-647.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Allen,T.J.(1977)Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization .:MIT Press,Cambridge,MA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Banker,R.D.,Datar,S.,Kemerer,C.F.,and Zweig,D. (1993)"Software complexity and software aintenance costs,"Communication of the ACM ,(36),Nove ber,pp. 81-93.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Barstow,D.,(1987)"Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering," Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering ,(9:5),pp.541-561.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Boeh ,B.W.(1981)Software Engineering Economics , Prentice-Hall,Inc.,NJ.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Brinck,T.and Gomez,L (1992)A collaborative ediu for the support of conversational props.CSCW '92.Pp.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Covi,L.M.,Olson,J.S.,and Rocco,E.(1998)A room of your own:What do we learn about support of teamwork from assessing teams in dedicated project rooms?In N Streitz,S.Konomi,and H.J.Burkhardt (Eds.)Cooperative Buildings.A sterdam:Springer- Verlag.Pp.53-65.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Dam ,C.H.,Hansen,K.M.,Thomsen,M.(2000)Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design:Gesture based odeling on an electronic whiteboard. Proceedings of CHI'2000,518-525.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Engestrom,Y.,and Middleton,D.(eds.).(1996) Cognition and Communication at Work .Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Fish,R.S.,Kraut,R.E.,Root,R.,&Rice,R.E.(1993) Video as a technology for informal com unication. Communications of the ACM,36.8-61.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Gibbs,W.W.(1994)"Software 's chronic crisis," cientific American ,September,pp.86-95.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Giglio,C.M.(1999)Business is war,but you can fight back with a killer app--a virtual war roo .Infoworld, (21:18),p.72.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Hoch,D.J.,Roeding,C.R.,Purket,G.and Lindner,S. K.,(2000)Secrets of Software Success,Harvard Business School Press ,Boston,MA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Hutchins,E.(1995)Cognition in the wild .Cambridge, MA:MIT Press]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Hutchins,E.(1997)"Constructing eaning from space gesture,and speech,"in Discourse,Tools,and Reasoning:Essays on ituated Cognition ,L.B.Resnick, R.Saljo,C.Pontecorvo,and B.Burge (eds.),Springer, Berlin,pp.23-40]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Ishii,H.,Kobayashi,M.,Arita,K.,and Yagi,T (1997) Iterative design of seamless collaboration edia.In K. Finn,A.J.Sellen,and S.B.Wilbur (Eds)Video-mediated Communication.Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbau Associates.Pp.435-456.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Johnson,J.,"CHAOS:The dollar drain of IT project failures,"Application Development Trends,(20:1),1995, pp.41-44.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Jones,C.,(1996)Applied Software Measurement: Assuring Productivity and Quality ,McGraw-Hill Book Co.,New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Kraut,R.E.,Egido,C.,&Galegher,J.(1990)Patterns of contact and com unication in scientific research collaborations (Pp.149-171).In J.Galegher,R.E.Kraut &C.Egido (Eds.),Intellectual teamwork:Social and technological foundations of cooperative work .Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbau Associates.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Kraut,R.E.and Streeter,L.A.(1995)"Coordination in Large Scale Software Development,"Communications of the ACM ,(38:7),pp.69-81..]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Mark,G.,Grudin,J.,and Poltrock,S.E.(1999)Meeting at the Desktop:An Empirical Study of Virtually Collocated Teams Proceedings of ECSCW'99 ,The 6th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12-16 September 1999,Copenhagen,Den ark.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Olson,G.M.&Olson,J.S.(in press)Distance atters. Human Computer Interaction.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Olson,M.H.,&Bly,S.A.(1991)The Portland experience:A report on a distributed research group. International Journal of Man-Machine tudies ,34,211- 228.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Poltrock S.E.,and Engelbeck,G.(1999)"Requirements for a virtual collocation environment," Information & Software Technology ,(41:6),pp.331-339.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Saund,E.(1999).Bringing the arks on a whiteboard to electronic life.In N.Streitz,J.Seigel,V.Hartkopf,&S. Kono i (Eds.),Cooperative Buildings:Integrating Information,Organizations,and Architecture ;Proceedings of the Second International Workshop (CoBuild'99).Heidelberg:Springer.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Sawyer,S.,Farber,J.and Spillers,R.(1997)"Supporting the social processes of software development teams," Information Technology and People ,(10:7),pp.46-62.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Sun Journal (1999)How to ju p-start Java computing initiatives.Nove ber 5,1999. http://www.sun.com/SunJournal/v1n4/global2.ht l]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.Whittaker,S.&Schwarz,H.(1995)Back to the future: Pen and paper technology supports complex group coordination.Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,CHI '95.NY:ACM Press.pp.495-502.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How does radical collocation help a team succeed?

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader
            About Cookies On This Site

            We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

            Learn more

            Got it!