Abstract
This paper discusses modularization as a mechanism for improving the flexibility and comprehensibility of a system while allowing the shortening of its development time. The effectiveness of a “modularization” is dependent upon the criteria used in dividing the system into modules. A system design problem is presented and both a conventional and unconventional decomposition are described. It is shown that the unconventional decompositions have distinct advantages for the goals outlined. The criteria used in arriving at the decompositions are discussed. The unconventional decomposition, if implemented with the conventional assumption that a module consists of one or more subroutines, will be less efficient in most cases. An alternative approach to implementation which does not have this effect is sketched.
References
- 1 Gauthier, Richard, and Pont, Stephen. Designing Systems Programs, (C), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.Google Scholar
- 2 Hoare, C. A. R. Proof of a program, FIND. Comm. ACM 14, 1 (Jan. 1971), 39-45. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 3 Parnas, D. L. A technique for software module specification with examples. Comm. ACM 15, 5 (May, 1972), 330-336. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 4 Parnas, D. L. Information distribution aspects of design methodology. Tech. Rept., Depart. Computer Science, Carnegie- Mellon U., Pittsburgh, Pa., 1971. Also presented at the IFIP Congress 1971, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
- 5 Dijkstra, E. W. The structure of "THE"-multiprogramming system. Comm. ACM 11, 5 (May 1968), 341-346. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 6 Galler, B., and Perlis, A. J. A View of Programming Languages, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1970. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 7 Parnas, D. L. A course on software engineering. Proc. SIGCSE Technical Symposium, Mar. 1972. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 8 Parnas, D. L. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Tech. Rept., Depart. Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon U., Pittsburgh, Pa., 1971.Google Scholar
- 9 Balzer, R. M. Dataless programming. Proc. AFIPS 1967 FJCC, Vol. 31, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 535-544.Google Scholar
- 10 Mealy, G. H. Another look at data. Proc. AFIPS 1967 FJCC, Vol. 31, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 525-534.Google Scholar
- 11 Wulf, W. A., Russell, D. B., and Habermann, A. N. BLISS, A language for systems programming. Comm. ACM 14, 12 (Dec. 1971), 780-790. Google Scholar
Digital Library





Comments