skip to main content
research-article

The Important Role Social Capital Plays in Navigating the Computing Education Ecosystem for Black Girls

Published: 16 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Black women represent the greatest underrepresentation in STEM fields, particularly the technology sector. According to a 2015 article in The Verge, Black women make up between 0% and 7% of the staff at the eight largest technology firms in the United States. This points to a glaring problem in terms of equity and inclusivity in the technology sector. Similar to their underrepresentation in the STEM sector, Black women's underrepresentation in the tech sector is related to pervasive and persistent prejudice and biased policies that endure in the United States, which have limited—and continue to limit—their access to quality education and spaces where Black women's cultural capital (i.e., ways of being) is acknowledged and appreciated. For most people, including Black women, social networks often make available opportunities and pathways toward realizing the roles they can play in the world or a particular industry. These webs of relationships and the embedded quality in them can be defined as an individual's social capital and be applied to any industry, including STEM and technology fields. In a practical sense, social capital allows an individual to leverage relationships for resources (e.g., information about internships and jobs or encouragement to persist through a difficult college course). In turn, these resources can contribute to economic opportunities (i.e., jobs) or social opportunities, such as relationships with gatekeepers who work in STEM fields that may lead to opportunities like jobs, projects, or financial backing.
Research suggests that the social networks of Black young women rarely overlap with the networks of predominantly White and Asian males, who are overrepresented in the technology field. This weakens Black women's awareness of opportunities and training, and undermines their motivation to persist in the STEM sector. As a result of this increasing understanding of the role of social capital in career development, K–12 and higher education programs that are focused on equity in STEM fields have increasingly turned to the concept of social capital to address the traditional underrepresentation of certain groups, particularly Blacks, Latinos, and women in STEM fields. The following research investigates the experiences of Black girls who attended a program, Google's Code Next, designed to engage Black and Latinx youth in computer science. We argue that it is crucial for computer science programs not just to teach hard coding skills but also to build on young Black women's social capital to accommodate the young women in creating and expanding their tech social capital, enabling them to successfully navigate STEM and technology education and career pathways. Specifically, this article explores a subprogram of Code Next and how it has contributed to young Black women's persistence in STEM, and particularly in technology. The findings suggest that the young women employed an expanded sense of social capital in addition to an expanded cultural capital (i.e., language, skills, ways of being) and worldview (i.e., sense of belonging and self-efficacy) to make sense of their possible selves in the world of technology.

References

[1]
Thomas Ricker. 2015. How do tech's biggest companies compare on diversity? The Verge. Retrieved March 1, 2020 from https://www.theverge.com/2015/8/20/9179853/tech-diversity-scorecard-apple-google-microsoft-facebook-intel-twitter-amazon
[2]
Pierre Bourdieu. 2007. The forms of capital. In Sociology of Education. A Critical Reader, A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.). Routledge, New York, NY, 83–95.
[3]
James Coleman. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, Suppl. (1988), 95–120.
[4]
Guan Saw. 2020. Leveraging social capital to broaden participation in STEM. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 1 (2020), 35–43.
[5]
Maya A. Beasley. 2011. Opting Out: Losing the Potential of America's Young Black Elite. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
[6]
John Jorstad. 2015. STEM Aspiration: The Influence of Social Capital and Chilly Climate on Female Community College Students. Ph.D. Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
[7]
Julie Moote, Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, and Emily MacLeod. 2020. Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and math aspirations and attitudes among young people aged 17/18. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57, 8 (2020), 1228–1249.
[8]
Kathleen Stolle-McAllister. 2011. The case for summer bridge: Building social and cultural capital for talented black STEM students. Science Educator 20, 2 (2011), 12–22.
[9]
Liana Christin Landivar. 2013. Disparities in STEM Employment by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin. Report ACS-24. U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.
[10]
National Science Foundation. 2017. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Report NSF 17-310. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/
[11]
Quoctrung Bui and Claire C. Miller. 2016. Why tech degrees are not putting more Blacks and Hispanics into tech jobs. New York Times, February 25, 2016.
[12]
Camille A. Ferguson, Daniel Light, and Vanora Thomas. 2020. How to help underrepresented young people in computer science feel successful. International technology. In Proceedings of the 14th International Technology, Education, and Development Conference.
[13]
Google Code Next. 2021. Home Page. Retrieved December 1, 2023 from https://CodeNext.withGoogle.com/
[14]
Camille A. Ferguson. 2021. The Formation Of Tech Social Capital In Black and Latinx Adolescents in an Urban Computer Science Program: A Case Study. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
[15]
Camille Ferguson, Vanora Thomas, Colin Schatz, and Daniel Light. 2018. Building Tech Social Capital: Supporting Pathways to Becoming the Next Generation of Black and Latinx Digital Creators. Unpublished Report. Education Development Center. New York, NY.
[16]
L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, A. M. Durik, A. M. Conley, K. E. Barron, J. M. Tauer, S. A. Karabenick, and J. M. Harackiewicz. 2010. Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement 70, 4 (2010), 647–671. DOI:
[17]
Prudence L. Carter. 2005. Keepin’ It Real: School Success beyond Black and White. Oxford University Press.
[18]
LaVar J. Charleston, Phillis L. George, Jerlando F. L. Jackson, Jonathan Berhanu, and Mauriell H. Amechi. 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in U.S. computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7, 3 (2014), 166–176. DOI:
[19]
Carol Farnsworth and Karen Holtzblatt. 2016. Diversity in high tech: Retaining employees once they're in the door. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[20]
Cary Funk and Kim Parker. 2018. Women and men in STEM often at odds over workplace equity. Pew Research Center. Retrieved December 1, 2023 from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/01/PS_2018.01.09_STEM_FINAL.pdf
[21]
Patrick L. Brown, James P. Concannon, Donna Marx, Christopher W. Donaldson, and Alicia Black. 2016. An examination of middle school students’ STEM self-efficacy with relation to interest and perceptions of STEM. Journal of STEM Education 17, 3 (2016), 27.
[22]
Kathryn Holmes, Jennifer Gore, Max Smith, and Adam Lloyd. 2017. An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16, 4 (2017), 655–675. DOI:
[23]
Xueli Wang. 2013. Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal 50, 5 (2013), 1081–1121. DOI:
[24]
Quinn M. David and Cooc North. 2015. Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school: Trends and predictors. Educational Researcher 44, 6 (2015), 336–346. DOI:
[25]
Jennifer M. Grossman and Michelle V. Porche. 2014. Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education 49, 6 (2014), 698–727.
[26]
Ebony O. McGee. 2016. Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture? American Educational Research Journal 53, 6 (2016), 1626–1662.
[27]
Maya A. Beasley and Mary J. Fischer. 2012. Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education 15, 4 (2012), 427–448. DOI:
[28]
Danhong Chen and Tse-Chuan Yang. 2014. The pathways from perceived discrimination to self-rated health: An investigation of the roles of distrust, social capital, and health behaviors. Social Science Medicine 104 (1982), 64–73.
[29]
Hongfei Du, Xiaoming Li, and Danhua Lin. 2015. Individualism and sociocultural adaptation: Discrimination and social capital as moderators among rural-to-urban migrants in China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 18, 2 (2015), 176–181. DOI:
[30]
Erika Hayes James. 2000. Race-related differences in promotions and support: Underlying effects of human and social capital. Organization Science 11, 5 (2000), 493–508. DOI:
[31]
Michael Sagas and George B. Cunningham. 2005. Racial differences in the career success of assistant football coaches: The role of discrimination, human capital, and social capital. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35, 4 (2005), 773–797. DOI:
[32]
Xueli Wang, Wickersham Kelly, Lee Yen, and Chan Hsun-Yu. 2018. Exploring sources and influences of social capital on community college students’ first-year success: Does age make a difference? Teachers College Record 120, 10 (1970), 1–46.
[33]
Elizabeth K. Lawner, Diane M. Quinn, Gabriel Camacho, Blair T. Johnson, and Bradley Pan-Weisz. 2019. Ingroup role models and underrepresented students’ performance and interest in STEM: A meta-analysis of lab and field studies. Social Psychology of Education 22, 5 (2019), 1169–1195. DOI:
[34]
Ralph B. McNeal. 1999. Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces 78, 1 (1999), 117–144. DOI:
[35]
Joshua Price. 2010. The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review 29, 6 (2010), 901–910. DOI:
[36]
Isabel J. Raabe, Zsófia Boda, and Christoph Stadtfeld. 2019. The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education 92, 2 (2019), 105–123. DOI:
[37]
Lee Shumow, Elena Lyutykh, and Jennifer A. Schmidt. 2011. Predictors and outcomes of parental involvement with high school students in science. School Community Journal 21, 2 (2011), 81.
[38]
Rachel Upton and Courtney Tanenbaum. 2014. The Role of Historically Black Colleges and Universities as Pathway Providers: Institutional Pathways to the STEM PhD among Black Students. Issue Brief. American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC.
[39]
Jean Whitney, Samantha Langley-Turnbaugh, Lynn Lovewell, and Babette Moeller. 2012. Building relationships, sharing resources, and opening opportunities: A stem learning community builds social capital for students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 25 (2012), 131–144.
[40]
Laura Perna, Valerie Lundy-Wagner, Noah D. Drezner, Marybeth Gasman, Susan Yoon, Enakshi Bose, and Shannon Gary. 2009. The contribution of HBCUS to the preparation of African American women for stem careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education 50 (2009), 1–23.
[41]
Louise Archer, Emily Dawson, Jennifer DeWitt, Amy Seakins, and Billy Wong. 2015. “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52, 7 (2015), 922–948. DOI:
[42]
Michelle Alberti Gambone and Amy J. Arbret.1997. Safe Havens: The Contributions of Youth Organizations to Healthy Adolescent Development. Report 167719. U.S. Department of Justice.
[43]
Ebony O. McGee and Lydia Bentley. 2017. The troubled success of Black women in STEM. Cognition and Instruction 35, 4 (2017), 265–289. DOI:

Index Terms

  1. The Important Role Social Capital Plays in Navigating the Computing Education Ecosystem for Black Girls

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
    ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 24, Issue 2
    June 2024
    327 pages
    EISSN:1946-6226
    DOI:10.1145/3613624
    • Editor:
    • Amy J. Ko
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2024
    Online AM: 30 November 2023
    Accepted: 19 October 2023
    Revised: 26 May 2023
    Received: 30 October 2020
    Published in TOCE Volume 24, Issue 2

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computer science underrepresentation
    2. inclusive computer science education
    3. cultural capital
    4. tech social networks
    5. social capital
    6. STEM
    7. workforce development
    8. informal education
    9. computer science education
    10. tech social capital
    11. STEM persistence
    12. black girls in computer science
    13. program evaluation
    14. racial equity in computer science
    15. cultural diversity in computer science
    16. tech identities
    17. intersectionality in STEM
    18. intersectionality in computer science

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 501
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)501
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)64
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media