
- 1. Sammet, J. E. Programming languages: history and fundamentals. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2. Zinn, K. L. Comparative study of languages for programming interactive use of computers in instruction. Boston: Office of Naval Research, 1969. RM-1469.Google Scholar
- 3. International Business Machine. IBM 1130/1800 basic FORTRAN IV language. IBM, 1969, File No. 1130/ 1800-25 Form C26-3715-5.Google Scholar
- 4. General Electric Co. Time-sharing Algol reference manual. General Electric, 1967.Google Scholar
- 5. Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC). Introduction to programming. DEC, 1969.Google Scholar
- 6. Toronto Board of Education. SPL TEXT. Toronto Board of Education, 1969.Google Scholar
- 7. Toronto Board of Education. STUDENT PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE. Toronto Board of Education, 1967.Google Scholar
- 8. Bauer, C. R., Peluso, A. & Worley, W. S. IITRAN/360 SELF INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AND TEXT. Toronto: Addison-Wesley, 1967.Google Scholar
- 9. General Electric Co. Basic language reference manual. General Electric, 1969.Google Scholar
- 10. Burstall, R. M., Collins, J. S., & Popplestone, R. J. POP-2 papers. London: Oliver and Boyd Ltd., 1968.Google Scholar
- 11. Hagelbarger, D. & Fingerman, S. An instruction manual for "CARDIAC". Bell Telephone Laboratories Inc., 1969.Google Scholar
- 12. University of Western Ontario. Computer science course manual. University of Western Ontario, 1970.Google Scholar
- 13. University of Toronto. A reference manual for the Simon Computer. University of Toronto, 1969.Google Scholar
- 14. Toronto Board of Education. Computer Services Department. SALE. Toronto Board of Education, 1969.Google Scholar
- 15. Department of Applied Analysis and Computer Science. An introduction to the SPECTRE COMPUTER. University of Waterloo (Ontario), 1968.Google Scholar
- 16. Knuth, D. E. The art of computer programming. Don Mills: Addison-Wesley, 1968-69. 2 vols.Google Scholar
- 17. Wegner, P. Programming languages, information structures, and machine organization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
A survey of pedagogical programming languages
Recommendations
Designing language-oriented programming languages
OOPSLA '10: Proceedings of the ACM international conference companion on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications companionToday, language-oriented programming (LOP) is realized by using either language workbenches or internal DSLs, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. In this work, we design a host language for DSLs with language workbench features, thereby ...
Program comprehension of domain-specific and general-purpose languages: comparison using a family of experiments
Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are often argued to have a simpler notation than general-purpose languages (GPLs), since the notation is adapted to the specific problem domain. Consequently, the impact of domain relevance on the creation of the problem ...
Language Design for Program Manipulation
The design of procedural and object-oriented programming languages is considered with respect to how easily programs written in those languages can be formally manipulated. Current procedural languages such as Pascal, Modula-2 and Ada; generally support ...






Comments