skip to main content
10.1145/383259.383285acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Interactive stereoscopic display for three or more users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

An ideal stereoscopic display system for multiple users is proposed. It allows three or more people to simultaneously observe individual stereoscopic image pairs from their own viewpoints. The system tracks the head positions of all of the users and generates distortion-free images for each eye of each user. The system consists of a normal display and a display mask, which has a hole in its center. The display mask is placed over the display surface at a suitable distance from it. By controlling the position of the image drawing area for each user according to the corresponding user's viewpoint, each user can observe the stereoscopic image pairs shown in an individual area of the display system with shutter glasses. On the other hand, no user is able to see the image drawing areas of the other users because these areas are adequately occluded by the display mask. Accordingly, the display system can simultaneously provide intelligible 3D stereoscopic images for three or more moving observers without flicker or distortion.

References

  1. 1.Pierre St. Hilaire, Stephen A. Benton, Mark Lucente, Mary Lou Jepsen, Joel Kollin, Hiroshi Yoshikawa, and John Underkoffler. Electronic Display System for Computational Holography. In Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 1212, pp. 174-182, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Stephen A. Benton, Pierre St.-Hilaire, Mark Lucente, John D. Sutter, and Wendy J. Plesniak. Real-time computer-generated 3D holograms. In Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 1983, pp. 536- 543, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Larry F. Hodges. Tutorial: Time-multiplexed stereoscopic computer graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 20-30, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Warren Robinett and Richard Holloway. The visual display transformation for virtual reality. Presence, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-23, 1995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Carolina Crus-Neira, Daniel J. Sandin, and Thomas A. DeFanti. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. In SIGGRAPH 93 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 135-142, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Colin Ware, Kevin Arthur, and Kellogg S. Booth. Fish tank virtual reality. In Proceedings of INTERCHI 93, pp. 37-41, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Wolfgang Kruger, Christian-A. Bohn, Bernd Frohlich, Heinrich Schuth, Wolfgang Strauss, and Gerold Wesche. The responsive workbench: a virtual work environment. IEEE Computer, pp. 42-48, July 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Fumio Kishino, Tsutomu Miyasato, and Nobuyoshi Terashimna. Virtual space teleconferencing - communication with realistic sensations. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pp. 205-210, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.Maneesh Agrawala, Andrew C. Beers, Bernd Frohlich, and Pat Hanrahan. The two-user responsive workbench: support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 327-332, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Tsutomu Miyasato and Ryohei Nakatsu. A study of a multistereoscopic display system for multi-viewers. In Proceedings of IEICE General Conference, A-16-21, 1997 (in Japanese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Katsuyuki Omura, Shinichi Shiwa, and Fumio Kishino. Development of lenticular stereoscopic display system: multiple images for multiple viewers. In SID '95 Digest, Society of Information Display, pp. 761-764, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Graham J. Woodgate, David Ezra, Jonathan Harrold, Nicolas S. Holliman, Graham R. Jones, Richard R. Moseley. Observer tracking autostereoscopic 3D display systems. In Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3012, pp. 187-198, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Ken Perlin, Salvatore Paxia, Joel S. Kollin. An autostereoscopic display. In SIGGRAPH 00 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 319-326, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Kazuo Nakazawa, Tohru Suzuki, Takashi Ashihara, Masashi Inagaki, Tsunetoyo Namba, Takanori Ikeda, and Ryoji Suzuki. Computational analysis and visualization of spiral wave reentry in a virtual heart model. Takami Yamaguchi, editor, Clinical Application of Computational Mechanics to the Cardiovascular System, pp. 217-241, Springer-Verlag Tokyo, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interactive stereoscopic display for three or more users

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGGRAPH '01: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
              August 2001
              600 pages
              ISBN:158113374X
              DOI:10.1145/383259

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 August 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              SIGGRAPH '01 Paper Acceptance Rate65of300submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader