skip to main content
10.1145/383259.383313acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

DAB: interactive haptic painting with 3D virtual brushes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a novel painting system with an intuitive haptic interface, which serves as an expressive vehicle for interactively creating painterly works. We introduce a deformable, 3D brush model, which gives the user natural control of complex brush strokes. The force feedback enhances the sense of realism and provides tactile cues that enable the user to better manipulate the paint brush. We have also developed a bidirectional, two-layer paint model that, combined with a palette interface, enables easy loading of complex blends onto our 3D virtual brushes to generate interesting paint effects on the canvas. The resulting system, DAB, provides the user with an artistic setting, which is conceptually equivalent to a real-world painting environment. Several users have tested DAB and were able to start creating original art work within minutes.

References

  1. ABL95.M. Agrawala, A. Beers, and M. Levoy. 3D painting on scanned surfaces. In the Proc. of 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 145- 150. ACM SIGGRAPH, April 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. BW98.D. Baraff and A. Witkin. Large steps in cloth simulation. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 43-54, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. CAS+97.C. Curtis, S. Anderson, J. Seims, K. Fleischer, and D. Salesin. Computergenerated watercolor. Proc. of SIGGRAPH'97, pages 421-430, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. COR00.COREL. Painter. http://newgraphics.corel.com/products/painter6.html, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CPE92.T. Cockshott, J. Patterson, and D. England. Modelling the texture of paint. Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics'92 Proc.), 11(3):C217- C226, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. DSB99.M. Desbrun, P. Schroder, and A. Barr. Interactive animation of structured deformable objects. Proc. of Graphics Interface'99, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. GEL00.A. Gregory, S. Ehmann, and M. C. Lin. inTouch: Interactive multiresolution modeling and 3D painting with a haptic interface. Proc. of IEEE VR Conference, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. HDD+94.H. Hoppe, T. DeRose, T. Duchamp, M. Halstead, H. Jin, J. McDonald, J. Schweitzer, and W. Stuetzle. Piecewise smooth surface reconstruction. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 295-302, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. hem00.RIGHT hemisphere. Deep paint. http://www.us.deeppaint.com/, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Her98.A. Hertzmann. Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH'98, pages 453-460, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. HH90.P. Hanrahan and P. Haeberli. Direct WYSIWYG painting and texturing on 3D shapes. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '90 Proceedings), volume 24, pages 215-223, August 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. JTK+99.D. Johnson, T. V. Thompson II, M. Kaplan, D. Nelson, and E. Cohen. Painting textures with a haptic interface. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lit97.P. Litwinowicz. Processing images and video for an impressionist effect. Proc. of SIGGRAPH'97, pages 407-414, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. May70.R. Mayer. The Artist's Handbook of Materials and Techniques. The Viking Press, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mei96.B. Meier. Painterly rendering for animation. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pages 477-484. August 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pix00.Pixologic. Z-brush. http://pixologic.com, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Smi78.Alvy Ray Smith. Paint. TM 7, NYIT Computer Graphics Lab, July 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. SN99.S. Saito and M. Nakajima. 3D physically based brush model for painting. SIGGRAPH99 Conference Abstracts and Applications, page 226, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Str86.S. Strassmann. Hairy brushes. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'86 Proc.), 20:225-232, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. WB97.A. Witkin and D. Baraff. Physically Based Modeling: Principles and Practice. ACM Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. WI00.H. Wong and H. Ip. Virtual brush: A model-based synthesis of chinese calligraphy. Computers & Graphics, 24, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DAB: interactive haptic painting with 3D virtual brushes

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '01: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
            August 2001
            600 pages
            ISBN:158113374X
            DOI:10.1145/383259

            Copyright © 2001 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 August 2001

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGGRAPH '01 Paper Acceptance Rate65of300submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader