10.1145/508530.508550acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnparConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An invitation to discuss computer depiction

Published:03 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper draws from art history and perception to place computer depiction in the broader context of picture production. It highlights the often underestimated complexity of the interactions between features in the picture and features of the represented scene. Depiction is not always a unidirectional projection from a 3D scene to a 2D picture, but involves much feedback and influence from the picture space to the object space. Depiction can be seen as a pre-existing 3D reality projected onto 2D, but also as a 2D pictorial representation that is superficially compatible with an hypothetic 3D scene. We show that depiction is essentially an optimization problem, producing the best picture given goals and constraints.We introduce a classification of basic depiction techniques based on four kinds of issue. The spatial system deals with the mapping of spatial properties between 3D and 2D (including, but not restricted to, perspective projection). The primitive system deals with the dimensionality and mappings between picture primitives and scene primitives. Attributes deal with the assignment of visual properties such as colors, texture, or thickness. Finally, marks are the physical implementations of the picture (e.g. brush strokes, mosaic cells). A distinction is introduced between interaction and picture-generation methods, and techniques are then organized depending on the dimensionality of the inputs and outputs.

References

  1. {3D} Deep Paint 3D. http://www.deeppaint3d.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {ABL95} M. Agrawala, A. Beers, and M. Levoy. 3d painting on scanned surfaces. ACM Symp. on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. {Ada95} A. Adams. The Camera+The Negative+The Print. Little Brown and Co, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. {Apo99} A. Apodaca. Photosurrealism. In A. Apodaca and L. Gritz, editors, Advanced Renderman : Creating CGI for Motion Pictures. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. {AS01} M. Agrawala and C. Stolte. Rendering effective route maps: Improving usability through generalization. In Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. {Auc99} K. Aucoin. Making Faces. Little Brown and Co, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {AZM00} M. Agrawala, D. Zorin, and T. Munzner. Artistic multiprojection rendering. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {Bar97} R. Barzel. Lighting controls for computer cinematography. J. Graphics Tools, 2(1), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. {BCD01} D. Bourguignon, M. P. Cani, and G. Drettakis. Drawing for illustration and annotation in 3d. Computer Graphics Forum, 20(3), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. {BETT99} G. Di Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I. Tollis. Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice Hall, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. {BFR95} V. Bourgoin, N. Farenc, and M. Roelens. Creating special effects by ray-tracing with non classical perspectives. Technical Report 1995-13. École Nationale des Mines de St Etienne, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. {BM92} Barbour and Meyer. Visual cues and pictorial limitations for computer generated photorealistic images. the Visual Computer, 9, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. {Boo63} P. J. Booker. A History of Engineering Drawing. Chatto and Windus, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. {BS00} J. Buchanan and M. Sousa. The edge buffer: A data structure for easy silhouette rendering. In Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. {BSLM01} B. Baxter, V. Scheib, M. Lin, and D. Manocha. Dab: Interactive haptic painting with 3d virtual brushes. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. {Can86} J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans PAMI, 8(6):679-698, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. {CAS+97} C. Curtis, S. Anderson, J. Seims, K. Fleischer, and D. Salesin. Computer-generated watercolor. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. {Che95} E. Chen. Quicktime VR - an image-based approach to virtual environment navigation. Proc. of SIGGRAPH, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. {CHZ00} J. Cohen, J. Hughes, and R. Zeleznik. Harold: A world made of drawings. In Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. {CJTF98} W. Toledo Corrêa, R. Jensen, C. Thayer, and A. Finkelstein. Texture mapping for cel animation. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. {CL93} B. Cabral and L. (Casey) Leedom. Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. {Clo71} M. Clowes. On seeing things. Artificial Intelligence, 2(1):79-116, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. {CP78} I. Carlbom and J. Paciorek. Planar geometric projections and viewing transformations. Comp. Surveys, 10:465-502, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. {CT01} S.-H. Chu and C.-L. Tai. Animating chinese landscape paintings and panorama using multi-perspective modeling. In Computer Graphics International, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. {Cur98} C. Curtis. Loose and Sketchy Animation. In SIGGRAPH: Conference Abstracts and Applications, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. {DHvOS00} O. Deussen, S. Hiller, C. van Overveld, and T. Strothotte. Floating points: A method for computing stipple drawings. Computer Graphics Forum, 19(3), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. {DOM+01} F. Durand, V. Ostromoukhov, M. Miller, F. Duranleau, and J. Dorsey. Decoupling strokes and high-level attributes for interactive traditional drawing. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. {DTM96} P. Debevec, C. Taylor, and J. Malik. Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: A hybrid geometry- and image-based approach. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 96, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. {DW83} F. Dubery and J. Willats. Perspective and Other Drawing Systems. Van Nostrand, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. {EC90} G. Elber and E. Cohen. Hidden Curve Removal for Free Form Surfaces. In Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. {EG01} J. Elder and R. Goldberg. Image editing in the contour domain. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(3), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. {EHW97} P. Eades, M. E. Houle, and R. Webber. Finding the best viewpoints for three-dimensional graph drawings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1353:87-??, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. {Elb95} G. Elber. Line art rendering via a coverage of isoparametric curves. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1(3):231-239, September 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. {Elk94} J. Elkins. The Poetics of Perspective. Cornell U. Pr., 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. {Fai98} Fairchild. Color Appearance Models. Addison-Wesley, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. {Fer99} J. Ferwerda. Varieties of realism. talk, Cornell Workshop on Rendering, Perception, and Measurement, http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/workshop/, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. {FLR+95} O. Faugeras, S. Laveau, L. Robert, G. Csurka, and C. Zeller. 3-d reconstruction of urban scenes from sequences of images. In A. Gruen, O. Kuebler, and P. Agouris, editors, Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Images. Birkhauser, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. {FS94} A. Finkelstein and D. Salesin. Multiresolution curves. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. {GDCV98} J. Gomes, L. Darsa, B. Costa, and L. Velho. Warping And Morphing Of Graphical Objects. Morgan Kaufman, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. {GFMS95} A. Glassner, K. Fishkin, D. Marimont, and M. Stone. Device-directed rendering. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 14(1):58-76, January 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. {GG99} G. Glaeser and E. Gröller. Fast generation of curved perspective for ultra-wide-angle lenses in vr applications. Visual Computer, 15:365-376, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. {GG01} Gooch and Gooch. Non-Photorealistic Rendering. AK-Peters, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. {GGSC98} A. Gooch, B. Gooch, P. Shirley, and E. Cohen. A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. {GH00} R. Gershbein and P. Hanrahan. A fast relighting engine for interactive cinematic lighting design. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, Computer Graphics, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. {GKR95} B. Guenter, T. Knoblock, and E. Ruf. Specializing shaders. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. {Gla00} Andrew Glassner. Cubism and cameras: Free-form optics for computer graphics. Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-05, Microsoft Research, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. {GM97} J. Geigel and K. Musgrave. A model for simulating the photographic development process on digital images. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. {Gom56} Gombrich. Art and Illusion. Princeton Press, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. {Gom82} E. H. Gombrich. The image and the eye : further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation. Cornell U. Pr., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. {Goo98} A. Gooch. Interactive non-photorealistic technical illustration. Master's thesis, U. of Utah, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. {Gre99} S. Green. Beyond photorealism. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. {GRMS01} B. Gooch, E. Reinhard, C. Moulding, and P. Shirley. Artistic composition for image creation. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. {Grö94} Eduard Gröller. Nonlinear ray tracing: visualizing strange worlds. Visual Computer, 11(5), 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. {GSG+99} B. Gooch, P. Sloan, A. Gooch, P. Shirley, and R. Riesenfeld. Interactive Technical Illustration. ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. {GSS+99} S. Green, D. Salesin, S. Schofield, A. Hertzmann, P. Litwinowicz, A. Gooch, C. Curtis, and B. Gooch. Non-Photorealistic Rendering. SIGGRAPH Non-Photorealistic Rendering Course Notes, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. {Guz71} A. Guzman. Analysis of curved line drawings using context and global information. In B. Meltzer D. Mitchie, editor, Machine Intelligence V6, pages 325-375. Edinburgh U. Pr., 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. {GW92} M. Gleicher and A. Witkin. Through-the-lens camera control. Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. {HAA97} Y. Horry, K. Anjyo, and K. Arai. Tour into the picture: Using a spidery mesh interface to make animation from a single image. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 97, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. {Hae90} P. Haeberli. Paint by numbers: Abstract image representations. Proce. SIGGRAPH, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. {Hag86} M. Hagen. Varieties of Realism: Geometries of Representational Art. Cambridge U. Pr., 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. {Hau01} A. Hausner. Simulating decorative mosaics. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. {HCS96} L. He, M. Cohen, and D. Salesin. The virtual cinematographer: A paradigm for automatic real-time camera control and directing. Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. {Her98} A. Hertzmann. Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. {Her01} A. Hertzmann. Paint by relaxation. In CGI, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. {HH90} P. Hanrahan and P. Haeberli. Direct WYSIWYG painting and texturing on 3D shapes. Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. {Hoc01} D. Hockney. Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters. Viking Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. {Hog81} B. Hogarth. Dynamic Light and Shade. Watson Guptill, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. {HOT98} J. Hodgins, J. O'Brien, and J. Tumblin. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE TVCG, 4(4), October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. {HP00} A. Hertzmann and K. Perlin. Painterly rendering for video and interaction. In Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. {Huf71} D. Huffman. Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, Machine Intelligence 6, pages 295-324. Edinburgh U. Pr., 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. {Hun95} Hunt. The reproduction of Color (5th ed.). Kings Langley:Fountain Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. {IMT99} T. Igarashi, S. Matsuoka, and H. Tanaka. Teddy: A sketching interface for 3d freeform design. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. {Kaj86} J. Kajiya. The rendering equation. In Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. {Kem90} M. Kemp. The Science of Art. Yale University Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. {KMN+99} M. Kowalski, L. Markosian, J. D. Northrup, L. Bourdev, R. Barzel, L. Holden, and J. Hughes. Art-based rendering of fur, grass, and trees. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. {Koe90} J. Koenderink. Solid Shape. MIT Press, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. {KS00} C. Kaplan and D. Salesin. Escherization. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. {Kub86} Michael Kubovy. The Psychology of Perspective and Renissance Art. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. {Lan77} E. H. Land. The retinex theory of color vision. Scientific American, 237(6):108-128, December 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. {Lev98} Jonathan Levene. A framework for non-realistic projections. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. {LG96} H. Löffelmann and E. Gröller. Ray tracing with extended cameras. J. of Visualization and Comp. Animation, 7(4):211-227, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. {Lit91} P. Litwinowicz. Inkwell: A 2 -d animation system. Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. {Lit97} P. Litwinowicz. Processing images and video for an impressionist effect. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. {LS95} J. Lansdown and S. Schofield. Expressive Rendering: A Review of Nonphotorealistic Techniques. IEEE CG & A, 15(3):29-37, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. {MAB+97} J. Marks, B. Andalman, P. Beardsley, W. Freeman, S. Gibson, J. Hodgins, T. Kang, B. Mirtich, H. Pfister, W. Ruml, K. Ryall, J. Seims, and S. Shieber. Design galleries: A general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 97, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. {Max83} Nelson L. Max. Computer graphics distortion for IMAX and OMNIMAX projection. In Nicograph '83 Proceedings, pages 137-159, December 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. {Mei96} B. Meier. Painterly rendering for animation. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. {MGT00} D. Martin, S. Garcia, and J. C. Torres. Observer dependent deformations in illustration. In Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. {Mil91} Millerson. Lighting for Television and Film, 3rd ed. Focal Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. {MKT+97} L. Markosian, M. Kowalski, S. Trychin, L. Bourdev, D. Goldstein, and J. Hughes. Real-time nonphotorealistic rendering. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. {MMK+00} L. Markosian, B. Meier, M. Kowalski, L. Holden, J. D. Northrup, and J. Hughes. Art-based rendering with continuous levels of detail. In Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. {NPA00} NPAR. Discussion. First International Symposium on Non Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. {OCDD01} B. M. Oh, M. Chen, J. Dorsey, and F. Durand. Image-based modeling and photo editing. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. {OH95} V. Ostromoukhov and R. Hersch. Artistic screening. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. {Ost99} V. Ostromoukhov. Digital facial engraving. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. {Pan27} Erwin Panofsky. Perspective As Symbolic Form (La perspective comme forme symbolique). Zone Books, 1927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. {Par01} R. Parent. Computer Animation: Algorithms and Techniques,. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. {PF92} P. Poulin and A. Fournier. Lights from highlights and shadows. In ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. {PFFL00} L. Petrovic, B. Fujito, A. Finkelstein, and L. Williams. Shadows for cel animation. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. {PFG00} F. Pellacini, J. Ferwerda, and D. Greenberg. Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. {PHM90} D. Pearson, E. Hanna, and K. Martinez. Computer generated cartoons. In Barlow, Blakemore, and Weston-Smith, editors, Images and Understanding. Cambrdge U. P., 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. {PHMF01} E. Praun, H. Hoppe, M., and A. Finkelstein. Real-time hatching. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. {Pir70} M. Pirenne. Optics, Painting and Photography. Cambridge U. Pr., 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. {PRJ97} P. Poulin, K. Ratib, and M. Jacques. Sketching shadows and highlights to position lights. In Proc. Computer Graphics International, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. {Rad99} P. Rademacher. View-dependent geometry. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. {RAGS01} E. Reinhard, M. Adhikhmin, B. Gooch, and P. Shirley. Color transfer between images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(4):34-41, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. {RB98} P. Rademacher and G. Bishop. Multiple-center-of-projection images. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. {RC99} R. Raskar and M. Cohen. Image Precision Silhouette Edges. In Proc. 1999 ACM Symp. on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. {Rey00} C. Reynolds. Stylized depiction in computer graphics non-photorealistic, painterly and 'toon rendering. http://www.red3d.com/cwr/npr/, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. {RH99} V. S. Ramachandran and W. Hirstein. The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6/7), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. {RK00} C. Rössl and L. Kobbelt. Line-art rendering of 3d models, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. {RS56} T. Ryan and C. Schwartz. Speed of perception as a function of mode of representation. Am. J. of Psychology, 69:60-69, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. {SABS94} Michael P. Salisbury, Sean E. Anderson, Ronen Barzel, and David H. Salesin. Interactive pen-and-ink illustration. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 94, pages 101-108, July 1994. ISBN 0-89791-667-0. Held in Orlando, Florida. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. {SB99} M. Sousa and J. Buchanan. Observational model of blenders and erasers in computer-generated pencil rendering. In Graphics Interface, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. {SD96} S. Seitz and C. Dyer. View morphing: Synthesizing 3d metamorphoses using image transforms. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. {SDS+93} C. Schoeneman, J. Dorsey, B. Smits, J. Arvo, and D. Greenberg. Painting with light. Computer Graphics, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. {SF91} Dorée Duncan Seligmann and Steven Feiner. Automated generation of intent-based 3d illustrations. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), 25(4):123-132, July 1991. ISBN 0-201-56291-X. Held in Las Vegas, Nevada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. {SGG+00} P. Sander, X. Gu, S. Gortler, H. Hoppe, and J. Snyder. Silhouette clipping. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. {SK98} S. Seitz and K. Kutulakos. Plenoptic image editing. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf.on Computer Vision, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  120. {SL01} R. Shacked and D. Lischinski. Automatic lighting design using a perceptual quality metric. Computer Graphics Forum, 20(3):215-226, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. {SMGG01} P. Sloan, W. Martin, A. Gooch, and B. Gooch. The lit sphere: A model for capturing npr shading from art. In Proc. Graphics Interface, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. {SSS74} Ivan E. Sutherland, Robert F. Sproull, and Robert A. Schumacker. A characterization of ten hidden-surface algorithms. ACM Computing Surveys, 6(1):1-55, March 1974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. {SST89} Saito, Shinya, and Takahashi. Highlighting rounded edges. In Computer Graphics International, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. {ST90} T. Saito and T. Takahashi. Comprehensible Rendering of 3-D Shapes. In Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. {SWHS97} M. Salisbury, M. Wong, J. Hughes, and D. Salesin. Orientable textures for image-based pen-and-ink illustration. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. {TB96} G. Turk and D. Banks. Image-guided streamline placement. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. {TDM01} O. Tolba, J. Dorsey, and L. McMillan. A projective drawing system. In ACM Symp. on Interactive 3D Graphics, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. {TFN99} Saeko Takagi, Issei Fujishiro, and Masayuki Nakajima. Volumetric modeling of artistic techniques in colored pencil drawing. In SIGGRAPH: Conf. abstracts and applications, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. {TJ81} F. Thomas and O. Johnston. The Illusion of Life : Disney Animation. Abbeville Pr., 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. {TT99} Tumblin and Turk. LCIS: a boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. In Proc. Siggraph, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. {TTT91} Tanaka, Tokiichiro, and Takahashi. Precise rendering method for edge highlighting. In Computer Graphics International, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. {Tum99} Jack Tumblin. Three methods of detail-preserving contrast reduction for displayed images. PhD thesis, College of Computing Georgia Inst. of Technology, September 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. {Uli87} R. Ulichney. Digital Halftoning. MIT Press, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. {VB99} O. Veryovka and J. Buchanan. Halftoning with image-based dither screens. Graphics Interface, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. {vH81} Hermann von Helmoholtz. On the relation of optics to painting. In Popular scientific lectures. Appleton, 1881.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. {Web83} Webster. Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. Merriam Webster, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. {WFH+97} D. Wood, A. Finkelstein, J. Hughes, C. Thayer, and D. Salesin. Multiperspective panoramas for cel animation. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. {Wil90} J. Willats. The draughtsman's contract. In H. Barlow, C. Blakemore, and M. Weston-Smith, editors, Images and Understanding. Cambrdge U. Pr., 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. {Wil91} L. Williams. Shading in two dimensions. In Proc. of Graphics Interface '91, pages 143-151, June 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. {Wil97} J. Willats. Art and Representation. Princeton U. Pr., 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. {WS94} G. Winkenbach and D. Salesin. Computer-generated pen-and-ink illustration. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. {ZB95} D. Zorin and A. Barr. Correction of geometric perceptual distortion in pictures. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. {ZBr} Pixelogic ZBrush. http://pixologic.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. {ZDPSS01} L. Zhang, G. Dugas-Phocion, J. Samson, and S. Seitz. Single view modeling of free-form scenes. In Proc. of CVPR, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  145. {Zek00} S. Zeki. Inner Vision : An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford U. Pr., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. {ZH00} D. Zorin and A. Hertzmann. Illustrating smooth surfaces. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. {ZHH96} R. Zeleznik, K. Herndon, and J. Hughes. SKETCH: An interface for sketching 3D scenes. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An invitation to discuss computer depiction

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!