skip to main content
10.1145/563858.563869acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Interactive analysis and display of tabular data

Published:20 July 1977Publication History

ABSTRACT

A program for simple data analysis and report design is described. The design emphasizes flexibility, ease of use, and rapid interactive response. These considerations are discussed in relation to the choices that may be made in the analysis and display design process. The analysis may be directed and monitored at several points - data selection and calibration, binning, choice of data scaling, choice of graphic variable, and scaling of the graphic variable. Table rows and columns can be re-organized by operators such as ranking, sequencing and grouping, and re-computed from arithmetic combinations of existing rows and columns. Where the raw data represents different cases scored over the same attributes, profile tables can be computed in a systematic fashion. Interactive report design is supported by a variety of page layout and chart annotation directives, which can be used to embellish and adjust the default line, bar and pie charts. The program can be used interactively as well as driven from a prepared script, and uses a device independent graphic system. Although intended to be used primarily with a graphics terminal, at least half the actual use has been conventional report generation on both alphanumeric and graphic terminals.

References

  1. Austin, D. M., Kranz, S. G., and Quong, C. An overview of the LRL socio economic environmental demographic information system. LBL-3699. March, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertin, J. Semiologie Graphique. Cauthier-Villars, Paris, (1967),69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson, T. A., and Ting, P. D. A new report generator. Proc. ACM-PACIFIC-75, San Francisco, Ca., (April 1975), 119-126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GRAFPAC Users Guide, Graphics Research Group, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, July 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kitous, B. Interactive matrix displays and management information reporting - a feasibility assessment. (Ph.D. thesis) LBL-5310. (June, 1976), 118-120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mendelssohn, Rudolph C. The development and uses of table producing language. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Report 435, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nie,Norman, et al. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schneider, Edward J., Barge, Sylvia, and Marks,Gregory A. Graphics for social scientists. Computer Graphics Vol. 10 No. 2 (Summer 1976), 125-131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '77: Proceedings of the 4th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
    July 1977
    254 pages
    ISBN:9781450373555
    DOI:10.1145/563858

    Copyright © 1977 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 July 1977

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader