10.1145/780542.780546acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge

Published:09 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The design of new quantum algorithms has proven to be an extremely difficult task. This paper considers a different approach to the problem, by studying the problem of 'quantum state generation'.We first show that any problem in Statistical Zero Knowledge (including eg. discrete log, quadratic residuosity and gap closest vector in a lattice) can be reduced to an instance of the quantum state generation problem. Having shown the generality of the state generation problem, we set the foundations for a new paradigm for quantum state generation. We define 'Adiabatic State Generation' (ASG), which is based on Hamiltonians instead of unitary gates. We develop tools for ASG including a very general method for implementing Hamiltonians (The sparse Hamiltonian lemma), and ways to guarantee non negligible spectral gaps (The jagged adiabatic path lemma). We also prove that ASG is equivalent in power to state generation in the standard quantum model. After setting the foundations for ASG, we show how to apply our techniques to generate interesting superpositions related to Markov chains.The ASG approach to quantum algorithms provides intriguing links between quantum computation and many different areas: the analysis of spectral gaps and groundstates of Hamiltonians in physics, rapidly mixing Markov chains, statistical zero knowledge, and quantum random walks. We hope that these links will bring new insights and methods into quantum algorithms.

References

  1. S. Aaronson, Quantum lower bound for the collision problem. STOC 2002, pp. 635--642 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Aharonov and A. Ta-Shma. quant-ph/0210077. A longer version of this paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Aharonov, A simple proof that Toffoli and Hadamard are quantum universal, quant-ph 0301040Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Alon, Eigenvalues and Expanders. Combinatorica 6(1986), pp. 83--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Alon and J. Spencer, The Probabilistic Method. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Applegate and R. Kannan, Sampling and integration of near log-concave functions, STOC 1991, pp. 156--163 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Born, V. Fock and B. des Adiabatensatzes. Z. Phys. 51, pp. 165--169, 1928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. Bubley and M. Dyer, Faster random generation of linear extensions, SODA 1998, pp. 350--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann and D. A. Spielman, Exponential algorithmic speedup by quantum walk, quant-ph/0209131Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. M. Childs, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, A. J. Landahl, Quantum search by measurement, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032314 (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. M. Childs, E. Farhi, J. Goldstone and S. Gutmann, Finding cliques by quantum adiabatic evolution, quant-ph/0012104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. M. Childs, E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, An example of the difference between quantum and classical random walks, quant-ph/0103020. Also, E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, Quantum computation and decision Trees, quant-ph/9706062Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. van Dam and S. Hallgren, Efficient quantum algorithms for Shifted Quadratic Character Problems, quant-ph/0011067Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. van Dam, M. Mosca and U. V. Vazirani, How Powerful is Adiabatic Quantum Computation? FOCS 2001, pp 279--287 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W. van Dam and U. Vazirani, More on the power of adiabatic computation, unpublished, 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone and S. Gutmann, A numerical study of the performance of a quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm for satisfiability, quant-ph/0007071.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lundgren and D. Preda, A quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm applied to random instances of an NP-complete problem, Science 292, 472 (2001), quant-ph/0104129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone and S. Gutmann, Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms with Different Paths, quant-ph/0208135Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann and M. Sipser, Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution, quant-ph/0001106Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. O. Goldreich and E. Kushilevitz, A Perfect Zero-Knowledge Proof System for a Problem Equivalent to the Discrete Logarithm, Journal of Cryptology, 6(2), pp. 97--116, 1993Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. O. Goldreich and S. Goldwasser, On the limits of non-approximability of lattice problems, STOC 1998, pp. 1--9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. O. Goldreich, A. Sahai and S. Vadhan, Honest-Verifier Statistical Zero-Knowledge Equals General Statistical Zero-Knowledge, STOC 1998 pp. 399--408 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali and C. Rackoff, The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems, SIAM J Comput, 18 (1), pp. 186--208, 1989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Grotschel and L. Lovasz, Combinatorial Optimization: A Survey, Handbook of Combinatorics, North-Holland, 1993Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. L. Grover, Quantum Mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack, Phys. Rev. Letters, July 14, 1997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Grover and T. Rudolph, Creating superpositions that correspond to efficiently integrable probability distributions, quant-ph/0208112Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. S. Hallgren, Polynomial-Time Quantum Algorithms for Pell's Equation and the Principal Ideal Problem, STOC 2002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Jerrum and A. Sinclair, E. Vigoda A Polynomial-Time Approximation Algorithm for the permanent of a matrix with non-negative entries, STOC 2000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Jerrum and A. Sinclair, The Markov chain Monte Carlo method: an approach to approximate counting and integration. in Approximation Algorithms for NP-hard Problems, D.S. Hochbaum ed., 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. T. Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of Quantum Mechanics, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 5, pp. 435--439(1951)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. A. Yu. Kitaev, Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer Problem, quant-ph/9511026Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Kobler, U. Schoning and J. Turan, The Graph Isomorphism Problem. Birkjauser, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Landau and Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Second edition of English Translation), Pergamon press, 1965Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. L. Lovasz: Random Walks on Graphs: A Survey. Combinatorics, Paul Erdos is Eighty, Vol. 2, ed. D. Miklos, V. T. Sos, T. Szonyi, 1996, pp. 353--398.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, John Willey & Sons (1958)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Information 2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. See A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and methods, 1995Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. J. Roland and N. Cerf, Quantum Search by Local Adiabatic Evolution Phys. Rev. A 65, 042308 (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. A. Sahai and S. P. Vadhan, A Complete Promise Problem for Statistical Zero-Knowledge, FOCS 1997 pp. 448--457 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. P. W. Shor: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM J. Comput. 26(5) 1997, pp. 1484--1509 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. W. L. Spitzer and S. Starr, Improved bounds on the spectral gap above frustration free ground states of quantum spin chains, math-ph/0212029Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Y. Shi, Both Toffoli and Controlled-NOT need little help to do universal quantum computation, quant-ph/0205115Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. S. Vadhan, A Study of Statistical Zero Knowledge Proofs, PhD Thesis, M.I.T., 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. J. Watrous: Quantum algorithms for solvable groups, STOC 2001, pp. 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!