T. H. Nelson
ABSTRACT
THE KINDS OF FILE structures required if we are to use the computer for personal files and as an adjunct to creativity are wholly different in character from those customary in business and scientific data processing. They need to provide the capacity for intricate and idiosyncratic arrangements, total modifiability, undecided alternatives, and thorough internal documentation.
I want to explain how some ideas developed and what they are. The original problem was to specify a computer system for personal information retrieval and documentation, able to do some rather complicated things in clear and simple ways.
In this paper I will explain the original problem. Then I will explain why the problem is not simple, and why the solution (a file structure) must yet be very simple. The file structure suggested here is the Evolutionary List File, to be built of zippered lists. A number of uses will be suggested for such a file, to show the breadth of its potential usefulness. Finally, I want to explain the philosophical implications of this approach for information retrieval and data structure in a changing world.
References
- 1.Bush, V., "As We May Think." The Atlantic Monthly, p. 101-108; July, 1945.Google Scholar
- 2.Hirsch, P., "The Bush Rapid Selector." Datamation, p. 56-57; June, 1965.Google Scholar
- 3.Wallace, E. M., "Experience with EDP Support of Individuals' File Maintenance." Parameters of Information Science: Proceedings of the American Documentation Institute (American Documentation Institute), p. 259-261; 1/1964.Google Scholar
- 4.Gorey, E., "The Unstrung Harp; or, Mr. Earbrass Writes a Novel," Duell, Sloan and Pearce, N. Y.; 1953.Google Scholar
- 5.IBM Data Processing Division, "The IBM Administrative Terminal System," Brochure 520-1146.Google Scholar
- 6.IBM Technical Publications Department, "1440/1460 Administrative Terminal System Application Description," White Plains, New York.Google Scholar
- 7.Timberlake, W. D., "Administrative Terminal System" (abstract.) STWP Proceedings; May, 1965.Google Scholar
- 8.Farrell, A. C., "Evolution of Automated Writing." STWP Proceedings; May, 1965.Google Scholar
- 9.Bobrow, D. G., and Bertram, R., "A Comparison of List-Processing Languages." Comm. ACM, p. 231-240; April, 1964. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Comfort, W. T., "Multiword List Items." Comm. ACM, p. 357-362; June, 1964. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Weizenbaum, J., "Knotted List Structures." Comm. ACM, p. 161-165; Mar., 1962. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Prywes, N. S., and Gray, H. J., "The Multilist System for Real Time Storage and Retrieval," Proceedings of IFIP Conference, p. 112-116; 1962.Google Scholar
- 13.Prywes, N. S., "Interim Technical Report: The Organization of Files for Command and Control," Moore School of Engineering; March, 1964.Google Scholar
- 14.Bachman, C. W., and Williams, S. B., "The Integrated Data Store—A General Purpose Programming System for Random Access Memories," AFIPS Conference Proceedings, p. 411-422; 1964.Google Scholar
- 15.General Electric Computer Department, "I-D-S," Company Brochure CPB-425.Google Scholar
- 16.General Electric Computer Department, "Introduction to Integrated Data Store," Company Brochure CPB-1048; 1965.Google Scholar
- 17.Bachman, C. W., "Software for Random Access Processing," Datamation; April, 1965.Google Scholar
- 18.General Electric Computer Department, "Integrated Data Store: New General Electric Technique for Organizing Business Data"; January, 1965.Google Scholar
- 19.Corbin, H. S., and Stock, G. J., "On-Line Querying via a Display Console," Fourth National Symposium on Information Display: Technical Session Proceedings, p. 127-154; 1964.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Complex information processing
Comments