skip to main content
10.1145/800250.807497acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The workstation concept of GKS and the resulting conceptual differences to the GSPC core system

Published:01 July 1980Publication History

ABSTRACT

GKS has evolved from a long process of national /1,2,3,4/ and international /5,6/ discussion on standardization of graphical systems. One of the basic principles of the Graphical Kernel System GKS is the concept of workstations that are used to address a display terminal with several input devices. This is a basic conceptual difference to the GSPC core system /6/, which will be discussed in this paper.

A workstation represents a collection of graphical devices that are operated in a coordinated fashion by an operator at a given site. The whole workstation is treated in GKS as one logical unit.

GKS features two dimensional output to and input from single or multiple workstations. Besides basic line drawing primitives raster graphics primitives are supported. The coordinates are transformed in a two-stage transformation process where the first stage can be set for each primitive and the second can be set for each workstation. Furthermore the setting of a workstation specific pen and text table allows control of the appearance of all primitives on the corresponding workstation.

A segment facility provides means for structuring a picture in subparts. Segments may be created and deleted, the segment attributes may be dynamically modified, and the segments may be transformed. They can be displayed simultaneously or alternatively on different workstations. A device independent segment storage serves for inserting segments into other segments.

References

  1. 1.J. Encarnacao, B. Fink, E. Hörbst, R. Konkart, G. Nees, D.L. Parnas, E.G. Schlechtendahl A recommendation on Methodology in Computer Graphics; A position paper for the IFIP-Graphics Workshop, Seillac, France, 1976 (Seillac I), published as report KfK 2394, 1977, KarlsruheGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.R. Eckert, F.J. Prester, E.G. Schlechtendahl and P. Wi{?}kirchen; Functional description of the Graphical Core System GKS as a step towards standardization; Informatik-Fachberichte 11, Springer 1977, pp. 163 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.R. Eckert, G. Enderle, K. Kansy and F.J. Prester; GKS'79 - Proposal of a Standard for a Graphical Kernel System; Proceedings of Eurographics'79, Bologna, October 1979, pp. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Proposal of Standard DIN 0066252; Information Processing - Graphical Kernel System (GKS); Functional description, NI-5.9/26-79, Version 5.2; 5.11.1979Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.R.A. Guedj and H.A. Tucker (editors) Methodology in Computer Graphics (Seillac I) North-Holland, 1979Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.J. Weiss; Device driver interfaces for decentral device drivers; Proceedings of Eurographics'79, Bologna, October 1979, pp. 252Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7."Status Report of the Graphic Standards Planning Committee"; Computer Graphics, Vol. 13, No. 3, August 1979 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The workstation concept of GKS and the resulting conceptual differences to the GSPC core system

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '80: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
            July 1980
            336 pages
            ISBN:0897910214
            DOI:10.1145/800250

            Copyright © 1980 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 1980

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGGRAPH '80 Paper Acceptance Rate52of140submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader