skip to main content
10.1145/944592.944595acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Failure to thrive: QoS and the culture of operational networking

Published: 25 August 2003 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Understanding the culture of operational networking can help to illuminate the question of why QoS has floundered. Network administrators have a well-founded aversion to complexity, in part because they experience failures attributable to design complexity on a regular basis. I argue that IP multicast defines a functional limit-case for deployable complexity in today's Internet. That limit is relevant to the deployment of QoS, since many flavors of QoS entail equal or greater complexity.The notion of a functional constraint on complexity draws attention to the economic, historical, and institutional forces which influence the fate of networking technologies. QoS will not be compelling for most network administrators until its design takes account of these forces.

    References

    [1]
    R. Atkinson. An ISP Reality Check. Presentation to IEprep, IETF 55, Nov 2002. http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/proceedings/02nov/219.htm#slides.
    [2]
    G. Armitage. Quality of Service in IP Networks. Macmillan Technical Publishing, Indianapolis IN, 2000.
    [3]
    S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. RFC 2475, An Architecture for Differentiated Services.
    [4]
    R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker. RFC 1633, Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview.
    [5]
    J. Burrescia and J. Leighton. DOE NGI Testbed: Project Close Out Report. http://www.es.net/hypertext/welcome/pr/DOE_NGI_TESTBED_REPORT3_Dec01.pdf
    [6]
    R. Bush. Complexity -- the Internet and the Telco Philosophies, a Somewhat Heretical View. NANOG 29, Oct 2002. http://www.psg.com/~randy/021028.nanog-complex.pdf
    [7]
    R. Bush and D. Meyer. RFC 3439, Some Internet Architectural Guidelines and Philosophy.
    [8]
    B. Carpenter and K. Nichols. Differentiated Services in the Internet. IBM Research Report. http://domino.watson.ibm.com/library/Cyberdig.nsf/398c93678b87a12d8525656200797aca/8efe46a5de7e3b8f85256b5e003c5883?OpenDocument
    [9]
    N. Christin and J. Liebeherr. A QoS Architecture for Quantitative Service Differentiation. IEEE Communications, 41(6), June 2003.
    [10]
    C. Diot, B. N. Levine, B. Lyles, H. Kassem, and D. Balensiefen. Deployment Issues for the IP Multicast Service and Architecture. IEEE Network magazine special issue on Multicasting, 14(1):78--88, January/February 2000. ftp://ftp.sprintlabs.com/diot/xcast-deployment.zip
    [11]
    S. Floyd and R. Atkinson, eds. Concerns with Network Research Funding. Presentation to the IETF 56 plenary. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03mar/slides/plenary19/index.html
    [12]
    S. Floyd and E. Kohler. Internet Research Needs Better Models. First Workshop on Hop Topics in Networks. http://www.icir.org/ models/hotnetsFinal.pdf
    [13]
    C. Fraleigh, F. Tobagi, and C. Diot. Provisioning IP Backbone Networks to Support Latency Sensitive Traffic. http://ipmon.sprintlabs.com/pubs_trs/pubs/cdiot/infocom03_provisionbb.pdf
    [14]
    G. Huston. RFC 2990, Next Steps for the IP QoS Architecture.
    [15]
    D. Meyer. Some Thoughts on QoS and Backbone Networks. Presentation to IEprep, IETF 55, Nov 2002. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/02nov/slides/ieprep-4.pdf.
    [16]
    K. Nichols, V. Jacobson, and L. Zhang. RFC 2638, A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for the Internet.
    [17]
    A. Odlyzko. Internet Growth: Myth and Reality, Use and Abuse. http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/internet.growth.myth.pdf
    [18]
    I. Stoica. Stateless Core: A Scalable Approach for Quality of Service in the Internet. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Dec. 2000.
    [19]
    T. Telkamp. Traffic Characteristics and Network Planning. NANOG 26, Oct 2002. http://www.nanog.org/mtg0210/ppt/telkamp.pdf
    [20]
    W. Willinger and J. Doyle. Robustness and the Internet: Design and Evolution. http://netlab.caltech.edu/pub/papers/part1_vers4.pdf
    [21]
    L. Zhang, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker, and D. Zappala. RSVP: A New Resource ReSerVation Protocol. IEEE Network, vol. 7, Sept 1993.

    Cited By

    View all

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    RIPQoS '03: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Revisiting IP QoS: What have we learned, why do we care?
    August 2003
    56 pages
    ISBN:1581137486
    DOI:10.1145/944592
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 August 2003

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. QoS
    2. complexity
    3. multicast
    4. operational networking

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SOSP03
    Sponsor:
    SOSP03: ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles
    August 25 - 27, 2003
    Karlsruhe, Germany

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)Adding Enhanced Services to the Internet: Lessons from HistoryJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.2066:1(206-251)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
    • (2016)Adding Enhanced Services to the Internet: Lessons from HistoryJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.02066(206-251)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
    • (2016)Stitching Inter-Domain Paths over IXPsProceedings of the Symposium on SDN Research10.1145/2890955.2890960(1-12)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2016
    • (2014)Aggregation management design for user-defined network infrastructureThe 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/APNOMS.2014.6996581(1-4)Online publication date: Sep-2014
    • (2013)A Retrospective Analysis of QoS Deployment, Operation and Use in Enterprise and Provider NetworksProceedings of the 2013 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops10.1109/WAINA.2013.26(583-588)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2013
    • (2011)VAIPA: A video-aware internet protocol architecture2011 IEEE 12th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing10.1109/HPSR.2011.5986017(140-145)Online publication date: Jul-2011
    • (2010)Automated and scalable QoS control for network convergenceProceedings of the 2010 internet network management conference on Research on enterprise networking10.5555/1863133.1863134(1-1)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2010
    • (2010)Generic load regulation framework for ErlangProceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Erlang10.1145/1863509.1863518(57-68)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2010
    • (2010)Fair and End-to-End QoS Controlled InternetProceedings of the 2010 Third International Conference on Communication Theory, Reliability, and Quality of Service10.1109/CTRQ.2010.22(85-91)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2010
    • (2004)Decentralized resilient grid resource management overlay networksIEEE International Conference onServices Computing, 2004. (SCC 2004). Proceedings. 200410.1109/SCC.2004.1358027(372-379)Online publication date: 2004
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media