article

Programming languages and gender

Published:01 January 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Comparing differences and similarities in programming language usage according to programmer gender.

References

  1. Arnold, D. and Niederman, F. The global IT work force. Commun. ACM 44, 7 (Jul. 2001), 31--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ferratt, T., Agarwal, R., Moore, J., and Brown, C. Observations from 'The Front': IT executives on practices to recruit and retain information technology professionals. In Proceedings of SIGCPR '99 (1999), 102--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Keith, K. and McWilliams, A. The return to mobility and job search by gender. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52, 3 (Apr. 1999), 460--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kulik, L. A comparative analysis of job search intensity, attitudes toward unemployment, and related responses. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73 (Dec. 2000), 487--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mottl, J. Labor shortage eases. Internet Week (May 8, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Panteli, A., Stack, J., and Ramsay, H. Gender and professional ethics in the IT industry. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1999), 51--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Stewart, T. In search of elusive tech workers. Fortune 137, 3 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Trauth, E. Mapping information-sector work to the work force. Commun. ACM 44, 7 (Jul. 2001), 74--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Truman, G. and Baroudi, J. Gender differences in the information systems managerial ranks: An assessment of potential discriminatory practices. Management Information Systems Quarterly 18, 2 (Jun. 1994), 129--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vancouver, J.B. and Ilgen, D.R. Effects of interpersonal orientation and the sex-type of the task on choosing to work alone or in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 6 (1989), 927--934.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. von Hellens, L. and Nielsen, S. Australian Women in IT. Commun. ACM 44, 7 (Jul. 2001), 46--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Programming languages and gender

      Reviews

      Celia T. Romm

      Gender differences in programming languages, a fascinating topic, are discussed in this paper. Based on a June 2000 survey of over 37,000 full-time information technology (IT) workers, the authors analyzed the number and type of programming languages that male and female IT employees possessed knowledge of. The findings indicated that female IT professionals had, on average, one less language than males (2.5, rather than over 3). The findings also indicated a difference in the type of languages known by the two groups. While male IT professionals had an advantage in languages that are used for engineering new systems, female IT professionals had an advantage in languages associated with maintaining existing systems. The most encouraging finding from this research was that the gap in the number and types of languages known by men and women programmers was much smaller (almost nonexistent) for younger programmers with less work experience than for older ones. This suggests that the gender gap between male and female programmers is narrowing. At the same time, the smaller representation of women in IT, the relatively lower level of jobs that women occupy, and the lower salaries that women currently earn in IT are still evident, and deserve closer scrutiny by policy makers and educators. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Communications of the ACM
        Communications of the ACM  Volume 47, Issue 1
        Multimodal interfaces that flex, adapt, and persist
        January 2004
        104 pages
        ISSN:0001-0782
        EISSN:1557-7317
        DOI:10.1145/962081
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 January 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!