10.1145/985692.985776acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Trust and mistrust of online health sites

Published:25 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Do different design and information content factors influence trust and mistrust of online health sites? Fifteen women faced with a risky health decision were observed while searching the Internet for information and advice over four consecutive weeks. In some sessions their searches were unstructured, whilst in other sessions they were directed to review specific sites, chosen for their trust design elements. Content analysis of concurrent verbalisations and group discussion protocols provided support for a staged model wherein design appeal predicted rejection (mistrust) and credibility of information and personalisation of content predicted selection (trust) of advice sites.

References

  1. Albarracin, D. & Kumkale, G., T. Affect as Information in Persuasion: A Model of Affect Identification and Discounting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 3, (2003) 453--469.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bhattacherjee, A. Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test. Journal of management Information Systems, 19,1 (2002) 211--241.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Briggs, P., Burford, B., De Angeli, A. & Lynch, P. Trust in Online Advice, Social Science Computer Review, 20, 3, (2002) 321--332.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Briggs, P., de Angeli, A. and Simpson, B. Personalisation and Trust: A Reciprocal Relationship? Forthcoming in M.C. Kalat, J. Blom and J. Kalat (Eds). Designing Personalized User Experiences for E-Commerce. Kluwer, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 39 (1980) 752--766]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheskin Research and Studio Archetype/Sapient (1999). Ecommerce trust study. Retrieved (July 16, 2003) from: http://www.cheskin.com/p/ar.asp?mlid=7&arid=40&art=0&isu=1]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clore, G., L., Schwarz, N.,& Conway, M. Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.) Handbook of Social Cognition (1994) 323--417. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B. and Wiedenbeck, S. On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, (2003) 737--758.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Egger, F.N. "Trust Me, I'm an Online Vendor": Towards a Model of Trust for E-Commerce System Design. Proc. CHI 2000. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Egger, F.N. Affective Design of E-Commerce User Interfaces: How to Maximise Perceived Trustworthiness. Proc CAHD: Conference on Affective Human Factors Design (2001) 317--324.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Eysenbach, G. and Köhler, C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal 324 (2002), 573--577.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eysenbach, G. Powell, J., Kuss, O., and Sa, E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web, a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 20 (2002), 2691--2700.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marchall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M. and Trowbridge, T.. Stanford-Makovsky Web Credibiltiy Study 2002: Investigating what makes Web sites credible today, A Research Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab & Makovsky & Company, Stanford University. Retrieved from : http://www.webcredibility.org .]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fogg, B.J. Prominence-Interpretation Theory: Explaining How People Assess Credibility Online. Proc CHI 2003, ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grabner-Krauter, S. and Kaluscha, E.A. Empirical research in online-trust: a review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58 (2003) 783--812.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Griffiths, F. Women's control and choice regarding HRT. Social Science & Medicine 49 (1999), 469--481.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hunter, M.S. and O'Dea, I. Perceptions of future health risks in mid-age women: estimates with and without behavioural changes and hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 33 (1999) 37--43.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Klein, J.D and Wilson, K.M. Delivering quality care: adolescents' discussion of health risks with their providers. Journal of adolescent health, 30(3) 2003, 190--195.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, M.K.O., and Turban, E. . A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 1 (2001), 75--91.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Longmate, E. & Baber, C. How useful are online community design guidelines: A case study of two fan communities. Paper Presented at Association of Internet Researchers Conference,AIRC 3.0, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. McAllister, D.J. Affect-Based And Cognition-Based Trust As Foundations For Interpersonal Cooperation In Organizations Academy Of Management Journal 38,1 (1995) 24--59.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N.L. Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time. In R. Falcone, M. Singh and Y.-H. Tan (Eds.) Trust in Cyber-societies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pandey, S.K., Hart, J.J., and Tiwary, S. Women's health and the internet: understanding emerging trends and implications. Social Science & Medicine 56 (2003), 179--191.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Petty, R.E. and Wegener, D. T. The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.),Dual-process theories in social psychology New York: Guilford Press (1999) 41--72.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pew Research Center. The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves (2000). Available at: <http://www.pewinternet.org/>]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Preece, J. Online communities: Designing usability and supporting sociability. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Reed, M. and Anderson, C. Evaluation of patient information Internet web sites about menopause and hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 43 (2002), 135--154.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. Shiny happy people building trust? Photos on e-commerce websites and consumer trust. Proc CHI 2003. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Shelat, B. and Egger, F.N. What makes people trust online gambling sites? An empirical study to identify on- and offline factors that influence gamblers' perception of an online casino's trustworthiness. Proc CHI 2002. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Smart, J M and Burling, D. Radiology and the internet: a systematic review of patient information resources, Clinical Radiology, 56(11), (2001) 867--870]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Stanford, J., Tauber, E., Fogg, B.J. and Marable, L. Experts vs. Online Consumers: A Comparative Credibility Study of Health and Finance Web Sites. Consumer Web Watch Research Report (2002). Retrieved (August 2003) from: <http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityresearch/slicedbread_abstract.htm>]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Steinbruck, U., Schaumburg, H., Duda, S. and Kruger, T. A picture says more than a thousand words: photographs as trust builders in e-commerce websites. Proc. CHI 2002. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Trust and mistrust of online health sites

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!