research-article

Decision support system with incomplete and domain incoherent information management

Publication: Control and Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Many of the most common human functions such as temporal and non-monotonic reasoning have not yet been fully mapped in developed systems, even though some theoretical breakthroughs have already been accomplished. This is mainly due to the inherent computational complexity of the theoretical approaches.

In the particular area of fault diagnosis in power systems however, some systems which tried to solve the problem, have been deployed using methodologies such as production rule based expert systems, neural networks, recognition of chronicles, fuzzy expert systems, etc.

SPARSE (from the Portuguese acronym, which means expert system for incident analysis and restoration support) was one of the developed systems and, in the sequence of its development, came the need to cope with incomplete and/or incorrect information as well as the traditional problems for power systems fault diagnosis based on SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) information retrieval, namely real-time operation, huge amounts of information, etc.

This paper presents an architecture for a decision support system, which can solve the presented problems, using a symbiosis of the event calculus and the default reasoning rule based system paradigms, insuring soft real-time operation with incomplete, incorrect or domain incoherent information handling ability. A prototype implementation of this system is already at work in the control centre of the Portuguese Transmission Network.

References

  1. CIGRE---Working Group 38.06.03, Expert systems: Development experience and user requirements, Electra, 146, 1993, 29--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Insfrán, A. Alves da Silva, & G. Lambert-Torres, Fault diagnosis using fuzzy sets, Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems and Applications (ISAP'99), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Kádár, A. Kovács, & A. Mergl, A tolerant event recogniser and alarm filter based on sequential pattern matching under introduction into the national dispatching centre, Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems and Applications (ISAP'97), Seul, Korea, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Z. Vale, Power systems control centers, in C. T. Mondes (Ed.), Intelligent systems---technology and applications, VI (CRC Press, 2003), VI-63-VI-112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Malheiro, Z. Vale, C. Ramos, J. Santos, & A. Marques, Enabling client-server explanation facilities in a real-time expert system, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1611 (Springer-Verlag, 2004), 333--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. A. Kowalski & M. J. Sergot, A logic-based calculus of events, New Generation Computing, 4, 1986, 67--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Shanahan, The event calculus explained, Artificial intelligence today, 1600 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, in M. Wooldridge & M. Veloso (Eds.) (Springer-Verlag, 1999), 409--430. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. A. Kowalski & F. Sadri, Reconciling the situation calculus and event calculus, Journal of Logic Programming, Special Issue on Reasoning about Action and Change, 31, 1997, 39--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Sadri & R. Kowalski, Variants of the event calculus, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, Kanagawa, Japan, 1995, 67--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Cervesato, M. Franceschet, & A. Montanari, The complexity of model checking in modal event calculi with quantifiers, Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2(1--2), 1998, 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Reiter, A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, 13, 1980, 81--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Antoniou, Nonmonotonic reasoning (MIT Press, 1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Finin, D. McKay, R. Fritzson, & R. McEntire, KQML: An information and knowledge exchange protocol, in K. Fuchi & T. Yokoi (Eds.), Knowledge building and knowledge sharing (Ohmsha and IOS Press, 1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Chittaro & A. Montanari, Efficient temporal reasoning in the cached event calculus, Computational Intelligence, 12(3), 1996, 359--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Rintanen, Lexicographic priorities in default logic, in Artificial Intelligence, 106(2), 221--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. Szyperski, Component software: Beyond object-oriented programming, 2nd edn (Addison-Wesley, 2002). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Geist, A. Beguelin, J. Dongarra, W. Jiang, R. Manchek, & V. Sunderam, PVM: Parallel virtual machine---A users' guide and tutorial for networked parallel computing, in Scientific and engineering computation (MIT Press, 1994). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. Decision support system with incomplete and domain incoherent information management

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!