Comparison of off-screen visualization techniques with representation of relevance on mobile devices

ABSTRACT

When exploring map information on mobile devices, relevant points of interest (POIs) are often located off-screen. Despite the existence of several techniques that allow the exploration of the surrounding areas, none represents the POIs' relevance. Furthermore, when the number of POIs increases, the visualization of the information often becomes unintelligible. This paper presents: our approach to enhancing off-screen visualization techniques with the representation of relevance and cluttering reduction; and a comparative study, using three modified techniques with the proposed approach, HaloDot, Scaled Arrows and Mini-Map. We concluded that while Scaled Arrows has advantages when analysing the distance to the most relevant objects, the Mini-Map provides better information about the distribution of the POIs, helping users on navigational tasks. Also, the choice of an off-screen technique depends, at least, on two factors: number and geographic distribution of POIs.

References

1. Baudisch, P., Good, N., Bellotti, V., and Schraedley, P. (2002). Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming. In Proceedings of CHI 2002, pages 259--266.
2. Baudisch, P. and Rosenholtz, R. (2003). Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects. In Proceedings of CHI 2003, pages 481--488.
3. Burigat, S. and Chittaro, L. (2011). Visualizing references to off-screen content on mobile devices: A comparison of arrows, wedge, and overview+detail. Interacting with Computers, 23(2):156--166.
4. Burigat, S. and Chittaro, L. (2013). On the effectiveness of overview+detail visualization on mobile devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(2):371--385.
5. Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., and Gabrielli, S. (2006). Visualizing locations of off-screen objects on mobile devices: a comparative evaluation of three approaches. In Proceedings of MobileHCI '06, pages 239--246.
6. Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., and Parlato, E. (2008). Map, diagram, and web page navigation on mobile devices: the effectiveness of zoomable user interfaces with overviews. In Proceedings of MobileHCI '08, pages 147--156.
7. Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., and Vianello, A. (2012). Dynamic visualization of large numbers of offscreen objects on mobile devices: an experimental comparison of wedge and overview+detail. In Proceedings of MobileHCI '12, pages 93--102.
8. Cockburn, A. and Savage, J. (2003). Comparing speed-dependent automatic zooming with traditional scroll, pan, and zoom methods. In Proceedings of BCS HCI 2003, pages 87--102.
9. Edwardes, A., Burghardt, D., and Weibel, R. (2005). Portrayal and generalisation of point maps for mobile information services. In Map-based Mobile Services, pages 11--30. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
10. Furnas, G. W. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. In Proceedings of the CHI '86, pages 16--23.
11. Ghani, S., Riche, N. H., and Elmqvist, N. (2011). Dynamic insets for context-aware graph navigation. In Proceedings of EuroVis'11, pages 861--870.
12. Gonçalves, T., Afonso, A. P., Carmo, M. B., and Pombinho, P. (2011). Evaluation of halodot: visualization of relevance of off-screen objects with over cluttering prevention on mobile devices. In Proceedings of INTERACT'11, pages 300--308.
13. Gustafson, S., Baudisch, P., Gutwin, C., and Irani, P. (2008). Wedge: clutter-free visualization of offscreen locations. In Proceedings of CHI '08, pages 787--796.
14. Hossain, Z., Hasan, K., Liang, H.-N., and Irani, P. (2012). Edgesplit: facilitating the selection of off-screen objects. In Proceedings of MobileHCI '12, pages 79--82.
15. Pombinho, P., Carmo, M., and Afonso, A. (2008). Evaluation of overcluttering prevention techniques for mobile devices. In Proceedings of IV 2008, pages 127--134.
16. Reichenbacher, T. (2007). The concept of relevance in mobile maps. In Location Based Services and TeleCartography, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, pages 231--246.
17. Reichenbacher, T. (2009). Geographic relevance in mobile services. In Proceedings of LOCWEB '09, pages 10:1--10:4.
18. Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of VL '96, pages 336--343.
19. Silva, S., Santos, B. S., and Madeira, J. (2011). Using color in visualization: A survey. Computers & Graphics, 35(2):320--333.
20. Swienty, O., Reichenbacher, T., Reppermund, S., and Zihl, J. (2008). The role of relevance and cognition in attention-guiding geovisualisation. Cartographic Journal, 45(3):227--238.
21. Swienty, O., Zhang, M., Reichenbacher, T., and Meng, L. (2007). Establishing a neurocognition-based taxonomy of graphical variables for attention-guiding geovisualisation. In Proceedings of SPIE'07, volume 6751, pages 6751:1--6751:13.
22. Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., and Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of CHI '11, pages 143--146.
23. Wolfe, J. M. and Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5:495--501.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Computers in other domains

    • Personal computers and PC applications

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Graphical user interfaces