Globalization and Global Health

Abstract

Globalization shrinks the world. The world watches on television people dying of hunger or in extreme poverty conditions. Every year, 8 million children die before they reach the age of 5 from preventable diseases. "Exotic illnesses" cease to be so exotic, they can cross borders easily. Ebola, originally an African worry, in 2014 was an international threat. The revolution in information technologies enables us witness the emergence of transnational epistemic communities exhibiting, measuring and explaining health and disease. Presently, the authors are more aware than ever of the health problems of people from far away countries, which decades ago were unknown and distant. The transparency and availability of this information exhibits, in a quasi-obscene way, an unacceptable world. A world that is willing to rescue banks and ignores the worst off-those people whose unlucky birth seals a never ending cycle of misery with almost no possibility of breaking it. This paper address the situation just described by asking: Are these new empiric circumstances reflected in the authors' moral understanding of the issues? How should the world think of global health and their obligations towards people living in deprivation? How can the new empiric possibilities the global world offers be related to the implementation of such obligations? What are some of the challenges to the translation of new obligations to the present world? In addressing these questions, the paper argues that if the world seriously wants to address the obligations towards those in need, even if they are far away from the places they may need to work not only with ideal proposals such as the "new obligations" pointed by Singer and Pogge, but also with different transitional theories and non-ideal strategies in order to solve some of the big challenges the real world impose to theories.

References

1. Arneson, R. 2004. Moral limits on the demands of beneficence? In Chatterjee D. The Ethics of Assistance:Morality and the Distant Needy pp. 33-58. New York: University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511817663.004.
2. Dunfee, T. 2006. Do Firms with Unique Competencies for Rescuing Victims of Human Catastrophes Have Special Obligations? Corporate Responsibility and the AIDS Catastrophe in Sub-Saharan Africa. Business Ethics Quarterly, 162, 200-202. doi:10.5840/beq200616222 PMID:17162832.
3. Feinberg, J., & Rawls, J. 1973. Duties and Obligations in the non-ideal world. The Journal of Philosophy, 709, 263-275. doi:10.2307/2025007.
4. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakehholder Approach. London: Pitman.
5. Goodin, R. The bioethics of Second-Best.InMillum J, Emanuel E, eds. Global Justice and Bioethics.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012:153-77.
6. Gostin, L., Heywood, M., Ooms, G., Grover, A., Røttingen, J.-A., & Chenguang, W. 2010. National and Global Responsibilities for Health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 8810, 719-719A. doi:10.2471/BLT.10.082636 PMID:20931051.
7. Hamlin, A., & Stemplowska, Z. 2012. Theory, Ideal Theory and the Theory of Ideals. Political Studies Review, 101, 48-62. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00244.x.
8. Lowry, C., & Schuklenk, U. 2009. Two models in Global Health Ethics. Public Health Ethics, 23, 276-284. doi:10.1093/phe/php032.
9. Millum J, Emanuel E. Global Justice and Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
10. Murphy, L. 2000. Moral Demand in Nonideal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. O'Neill, O. 2001. Agents of Justice in Thomas Pogge Global Justice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
12. Pogge, T. 2001. Priorities of Global Justice. Metaphilosophy, 321-2, 6-24. doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00172.
13. Pogge, T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. London: Polity Press.
14. Pogge, T. 2010. The Role of International Law in Reproducing Massive Poverty in Besson S and Tasioulas J. The Philosophy of International Law pp. 417-436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Rawls J. The law of peoples.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1999: Section 2, 39, 69.
16. Scanlon, T. 1998. What we Owe to Each Other p. 224. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
17. Simmons, J. 2010. Ideal and NonidealTheory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 381, 5-36. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.x.
18. Simmons, J. 2010. Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 381, 5-36. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.x.
19. Singer, P. 1972 "Famine, affluence and morality". Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol 1 N 3, pp. 229-243. Reprinted in LaFollette H. 1997 Ethics in Practice. An Anthology, Cambridge, Massachussets, Blackwell pp 585-595 p.586. In this paper I will quote LaFollette's edition.
20. Sreenivasan, G. 2012. Nonideal Theory: A Taxonomy with illustration. In Millum, J., & Emanuel, E. Eds., Global Justice and Bioethics pp. 153-177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.