10.5555/2936924.2937170acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedings
extended-abstract

Learning to be Fair in Multiplayer Ultimatum Games: (Extended Abstract)

ABSTRACT

We study a multiplayer extension of the well-known Ultimatum Game (UG) through the lens of a reinforcement learning algorithm. Multiplayer Ultimatum Game (MUG) allows us to study fair behaviors beyond the traditional pairwise interaction models. Here, a proposal is made to a quorum of Responders, and the overall acceptance depends on reaching a threshold of individual acceptances. We show that learning agents coordinate their behavior into different strategies, depending on factors such as the group acceptance threshold and the group size. Overall, our simulations show that stringent group criteria trigger fairer proposals and the effect of group size on fairness depends on the same group acceptance criteria.

References

  1. U. Fischbacher, C. M. Fong, and E. Fehr. Fairness, errors and the power of competition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1):527--545, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. W. Güth, R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4):367--388, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. J. Kauffman, H. Lai, and C.-T. Ho. Incentive mechanisms, fairness and participation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3):249--262, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. M. Messick, D. A. Moore, and M. H. Bazerman. Ultimatum bargaining with a group: Underestimating the importance of the decision rule. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2):87--101, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. J. Osborne. An introduction to game theory. Number 3. Oxford University Press New York, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. E. Roth and I. Erev. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1):164--212, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. P. Santos, F. C. Santos, A. Paiva, and J. M. Pacheco. Evolutionary dynamics of group fairness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 378:96--102, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning to be Fair in Multiplayer Ultimatum Games

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!