10.5555/3157382.3157469guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnipsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Equality of opportunity in supervised learning

Online:05 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a criterion for discrimination against a specified sensitive attribute in supervised learning, where the goal is to predict some target based on available features. Assuming data about the predictor, target, and membership in the protected group are available, we show how to optimally adjust any learned predictor so as to remove discrimination according to our definition. Our framework also improves incentives by shifting the cost of poor classification from disadvantaged groups to the decision maker, who can respond by improving the classification accuracy. We enourage readers to consult the more complete manuscript on the arXiv.

References

  1. Solon Barocas and Andrew Selbst. Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. John Podesta, Penny Pritzker, Ernest J. Moniz, John Holdren, and Jefrey Zients. Big data: Seizing opportunities and preserving values. Executive Office of the President, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Big data: A report on algorithmic systems, opportunity, and civil rights. Executive Office of the President, May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dino Pedreshi, Salvatore Ruggieri, and Franco Turini. Discrimination-aware data mining. In Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Calders, F. Kamiran, and M. Pechenizkiy. Building classifiers with independency constraints. In In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pages 13-18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Indre Zliobaite. On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classification. CoRR, abs/1505.05723, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, and Krishna P Gummadi. Learning fair classifiers. CoRR, abs:1507.05259, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard S. Zemel. Fairness through awareness. In Proc. ACM ITCS, pages 214-226, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jon M. Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan. Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. CoRR, abs/1609.05807, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Larry Wasserman. All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. US Federal Reserve. Report to the congress on credit scoring and its effects on the availability and affordability of credit, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      Guide Proceedings cover image
      NIPS'16: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
      December 2016
      5100 pages

      Publisher

      Curran Associates Inc.

      Red Hook, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Online: 5 December 2016
      • Published: 5 December 2016

      Qualifiers

      • Article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!