10.1145/1244002.1244060acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedings
ARTICLE

Enhancing QoS metrics estimation in multiclass networks

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the problematic of QoS monitoring, suggesting the use of on-line multipurpose active monitoring in multiclass networks as a powerful tool to efficiently assist and enhance the control of multiple service levels. To improve the simultaneous estimation of one-way QoS metrics, we propose a flexible probing source able to adjust probing patterns to the measurement requirements of each service class, exploring pattern coloring to better sense packet loss. The proof-of-concept provided shows that the proposed solution improves the estimation accuracy of multiple QoS metrics significantly, with a reduced probing overhead.

References

  1. H. Asgari, P. Trimintzios, M. Irons, R. Egan, and G. Pavlou. Building Quality-of-Service Monitoring Systems for Traffic Engineering and Service Management. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 11 (4):399--426, Dec. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Coppens, et al. SCAMPI: A Scalable and Programmable Architecture for Monitoring Gigabit Networks. In 6th IFIP/IEEE MMNS'03, Sept. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Corral, G. Texier, and L. Toutain. End-to-end Active Measurement Architecture in IP Networks (SATURNE). In PAM'03, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Georgatos, F. Gruber, D. Karrenberg, M. Santcroos, H. Uijterwaal, and R. Wilhelm. Providing Active Measurements as a Regular Service for ISPs. In PAM'01, Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Glossbrenner. Internet Protocol Data Comm. Service - IP Packet Transfer and Availability Performance Parameters. ITU-T I.380, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Leinen and V. Reijs. Geant D9.7 - Testing of Traffic Measurement Tools. Geant Project, Sept. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Lima, P. Carvalho, and V. Freitas. Tuning Active Monitoring in Multiservice IP Networks. In Perf. Modelling and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks (HET-Nets'04), U.K., July 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. R. Lima, P. Carvalho, and V. Freitas. Self-adaptive Distributed Management of QoS and SLSs in Multiservice Networks. In IEEE/IFIP IM 2005, Nice, France, May 2005. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. Lowekamp. Combining Active and Passive Network Measurements to Build Scalable Monitoring Systems on the Grid. ACM Performance Evaluation Review, 30(4):19--26, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. V. Paxson, G. Almes, J. Mahdavi, and M. Mathis. Framework for IP Performance Metrics. RFC 2330 (Informational), May 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Prasad, C. Dovrolis, M. Murray, and K. Claffy. Bandwidth Estimation: Metrics, Measurement Techniques and Tools. IEEE Network, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Whitner, G. Pollock, and C. Cook. On Active Measurements in QoS-Enabled IP Networks. In PAM'02, Fort Collins CO, Mar. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing QoS metrics estimation in multiclass networks

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!