10.1145/1810617.1810656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedings
research-article

Design and evaluation of a hypervideo environment to support veterinary surgery learning

ABSTRACT

In the search of alternative ways to learning veterinary surgery with live animals, hypervideo was considered a promising candidate as a learning tool. Video can enhance the realism and authenticity of a learning environment. By adding structure and interactivity to video, hypervideo allows to navigate video and to explore other related media to complement it. Hypervideo might then support the creation of a rich and realistic learning environment, through the interactive access, construction and communication of knowledge on veterinary surgery. In this paper, we present the design and evaluation of Hvet, a hypervideo environment to support learning of veterinary surgery. Design was based on cognitive and media theories, and evaluation was based on the use of Hvet by veterinary students, in order to test its efficacy in substitution of learning and training with live animals. Results support the hypothesis, showing the potential of hypervideo as a valuable and effective tool to support learning of surgery techniques and revealing the most appreciated design options.

References

  1. Armes, R. 1988. On Video. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnheim, R. 2004. Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye. Univ. of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. 1992. Working memory. Science, 255, 556--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barry, A.M. 1997. Visual Intelligence Perception, Image, and Manipulation in Visual Communication. Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaumont, C. 2009. Holog. video-calling technology could be found in homes within next five years, Telegraph, Feb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle, T. 2002. Towards a Theoretical Base for Educational Multimedia Design. Journal of Interactive Multimedia in Education (2).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brøndmo, H.P,. and Davenport, G., 1991. Creating and viewing the Elastic Charles: a hypermedia journal, in R.McAleese and C. Green (eds.) Hypertext: State of the Art, Oxford: Intellect, 43--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brusilovsky, P. 2000. Web lectures: Electronic presentations in Web based instruction, Syllabus, 13(5), 18--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan, M.C., Zellweger, P., T. 1992. Specifying Temporal Behavior in Hypermedia Documents, Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'92, Milano, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chambel, T., and Guimarães, N., 2002. Context Perception in Video-Based Hypermedia Spaces. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'02, College Park, Maryland, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chambel, T., and Guimarães, N. 2009. Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences. Encyclopedia of Distance Learning 2nd.ed. Idea Group Inc. January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chambel, T., Zahn, C., Finke, M. 2006. Hypervideo and Cognition: Designing Video-Based Hypermedia for Individual Learning and Collaborative Knowledge Building", in Alkalifa, E. (ed.), Cognitively Informed Systems: Utilizing Practical Approaches to Enrich Information Presentation and Transfer, Idea Group Publishing, pp. 26--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, R., and Craig, T. 1992. Research and Theory on multimedia learning effects. In Max Giardina (ed.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Coltheart, M. 1980. Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception Psychophysics, 27: 183--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dakss, S., Agamanolis, S., Bove, V.M., and Chalom, E. 1998. Hyperlinked Video, Proc. SPIE Multimedia Systems and Applications, v. 3528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Halasz, F., Schwartz, M., 1990. The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. In Proc. of the Hypertext Standardization Workshop, NIST, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardman, L., Bulterman, D., van Rossum, G.1995. The Amsterdam Hypermedia Model: Adding time and Context to the Dexter Model, Com. of ACM, 37(2), 50--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hirata, K. Hara, Y., Shibata, N., and Hirabayashi, F. 1993 Media-based navigation for hypermedia systems, in Proceeding of ACM Hypertext '93, Seattle, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kahn,P., and Haan,B.J. 1991. Video in Hypermedia: The Design of InterVideo, in Visual Resources, (VII) 353--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolb, D. 1983. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kristof, R. and Satran, A. 1995. Interactivity by Design: Creating e Com.With New Media. Indianapolis: Ad. Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Landow, G. 1989. The Rhetoric of Hypermedia, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1, 39--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Landow, G., and Kahn, P. 1992. Where's the Hypertext? The Dickens Web as a System-Independent Hypertext, Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'92, Milano, Italy, 149--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. LiestØl,G. 1994. Aesthetic and Rhetorical Aspects of Linking Video in Hypermedia. In Proc. of ACM HT'94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mayer, R. 2001. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nelson, T., 1974. Branching presentational systems-Hypermedia, Dream Machines, 44--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Norman, D. 1993. Things That Make Us Smart, A. Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Paivio, A. 1991. Dual Coding Theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Park, O., and Hopkins, R. 1993. Instructional Conditions for Using Dynamic Visual Displays: A Review. Instructional Science. 21, 427--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Pea, R., Lindgren, R., Rosen, J. 2006. Computer-supported collaborative video analysis, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN, USA, pp. 516--521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Primo, A., and Recuero, R. 2004. Participatory creation of multidirectional links aided by the use of Colink technology. In International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rouet, J.F. 1992. Cognitive Processing of Hyperdocu--ments: When Does Nonlinearity Help?, in Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'92, Milano, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Reeves, T., and Harmon, S. 1994. Systematic evaluation procedures for interactive multimedia for education and training. In S.Reisman(ed.), Multimedia computing: Prepa-ring for the 21st century, Idea Group Publishing, 471--505. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rogers, Y., Rutherford, A., and Bibby, P. (eds.) 1992. Models in the mind: Theory, perspective and application, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sawhney. N, Balcom, D., Smith, I. 1996. HyperCafe: Narrative and Aesthetic Properties of Hypervideo. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'96, Bethesda, MD, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shipman, F., Girgensohn, A., Wilcox, L. 2003. Combining spatial and navigational structure in the hyper-hitchcock hypervideo editor. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'03. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Smeak, D. D. 2007. Teaching surgery to the veterinary novice: the Ohio State University experience. Journal Vet. Med. Educ. Winter, 34(5):620--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Sweller, J. 1994. Cognitive Load Theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4: 295--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Thibault-Laulan, A.M. 1972. Image et Communication, Editions Universitaires, Encyc: Sciences humaines, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Tiellet, C.A.B. 2007. Projeto Hipermídia no Ensino: Produção de Objetos de Aprendizagem Hipermídia Através de Aprendizagem Colaborativa. In Proc. of InterTIC'2007, Int. Assoc. for the Scientific Knowledge, pp. 234--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. W3C. 2008. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) Specification, 1 Dec.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Zahn, C., Schwan, S., and Barquero, B. 2002. Authoring hypervideos: Design for learning and learning by design. In: Bromme & Stahl, Writing Hypertext and Learning: Conceptual & Empirical Approaches. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design and evaluation of a hypervideo environment to support veterinary surgery learning

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader
              About Cookies On This Site

              We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

              Learn more

              Got it!