Implied dynamics in information visualization

ABSTRACT

Information visualization is a powerful method for understanding and working with data. However, we still have an incomplete understanding of how people use visualization to think about information. We propose that people use visualization to support comprehension and reasoning by viewing abstract visual representations as physical scenes with a set of implied dynamics between objects. Inferences based on these implied dynamics are metaphorically extended to form inferences about the represented information. This view predicts that even seemingly meaningless properties of a visualization, including such minor design elements as borders, background areas, and the connectedness of parts, may affect how people perceive semantic aspects of data by suggesting different potential dynamics between data points. We present a study that supports this claim and discuss the design implications of this theory of information visualization.

References

1. Amazon Mechanical Turk, http://aws.amazon.com/mturk/. Retrieved 10-16-2008.
2. R. Arnheim. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. UC Press, 1974.
3. R. Arnheim. The Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts. UC Press, 1988.
4. C. Brewer and M. Harrower. ColorBrewer, http://www.colorbrewer.org/, 2002. Retrieved 12-4-2008.
5. L. Elting, C. Martin, S. Cantor, and E. Rubenstein. Influence of data display formats on physician investigators' decisions to stop clinical trials: prospective trial with repeated measures. BMJ, 318:1527--1531, 1999.
6. J. Freyd. Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94(4):427--438, 1987.
7. J. Freyd, T. Pantzer, and J. Cheng. Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117:395--407, 1988.
8. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
9. T. Hubbard. Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(3):322--338, 1995.
10. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
11. G. Lohse and E. Johnson. A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68:28--43, 1996.
12. M. Monroe. The apparent weight of color and correlated phenomena. The American Journal of Psychology, 36(2):192--206, 1925.
13. D. Norman. Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3):38--43, 1999.
14. D. Richardson, M. Spivey, L. Barsalou, and K. McRae. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27:767--780, 2003.
15. J. Siskind. Grounding the lexical semantics of verbs in visual perception using force dynamics and event logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15:31--90, 2001.
16. B. Tversky, J. Zacks, P. Lee, and J. Heiser. Lines, blobs, crosses and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In Theory and Application of Diagrams, pages 221--230. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
17. C. Ware. Visual Thinking for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
18. J. Zacks and B. Tversky. Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory & Cognition, 27(6):1073--1079, 1999.
19. C. Ziemkiewicz and R. Kosara. The shaping of information by visual metaphors. IEEE TVCG, 14(6):1269--1276, 2008.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)