10.1145/1878803.1878809acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedings
research-article

Towards accessible touch interfaces

ABSTRACT

Touch screen mobile devices bear the promise of endless leisure, communication, and productivity opportunities to motor-impaired people. Indeed, users with residual capacities in their upper extremities could benefit immensely from a device with no demands regarding strength. However, the precision required to effectively select a target without physical cues creates problems to people with limited motor abilities. Our goal is to thoroughly study mobile touch screen interfaces, their characteristics and parameterizations, thus providing the tools for informed interface design for motor-impaired users. We present an evaluation performed with 15 tetraplegic people that allowed us to understand the factors limiting user performance within a comprehensive set of interaction techniques (Tapping, Crossing, Exiting and Directional Gesturing) and parameterizations (Position, Size and Direction). Our results show that for each technique, accuracy and precision vary across different areas of the screen and directions, in a way that is directly dependent on target size. Overall, Tapping was both the preferred technique and among the most effective. This proves that it is possible to design inclusive unified interfaces for motor-impaired and able-bodied users once the correct parameterization or adaptability is assured.

References

  1. Dreyfuss, H. and Alvin, R. and others. 1993. The Measure of Man and Woman. Whitney Library of Design, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Froehlich, J., Wobbrock, J., and Kane, K. 2007. Barrier pointing: using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. In Proc of ASSETS '07. ACM Press, New York, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Greenstein, J. 1997. Pointing Devices. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 1317--1348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Guerreiro, T., Nicolau, H., Jorge, J., Gonçalves, D. 2010. Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics. In Proc. of MobileHCI'10. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., and Smith, I. E. 2008. Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In Proc. of MobileHCI'08. ACM Press, New York, NY, 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lee, S., and Zhai, S. 2009. The performance of touch screen soft buttons. In Proc of CHI'09. ACM Press, New York, NY, 309--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lewis, J. 1992. Literature review of touch screen research from 1980 to 1992. IBM, Boca Raton, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K., Sears, A., and Jacko, J. 2007. How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Elsevier, 65, 9, 759--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mizobuchi, S., Chignell, M., and Newton, D. 2005. Mobile text entry: relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. In Proc. of MobileHCI'05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 122--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Myers, B., Wobbrock, J., Yang, S., Yeung, B., Nichols, J., and Miller, R. 2002. Using handhelds to help people with motor impairments. In Proc. of ASSETS '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Parhi, P., Karlson, A., and Bederson, B. 2006. Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. In Proc. of MobileHCI'06 . ACM Press, New York, NY, 203--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Park, Y., Han, S., Park, J., and Cho, Y. 2008. Touch key design for target selection on a mobile phone. In Proc. of MobileHCI'08. ACM Press, New York, NY, 423--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Perry, K., and Hourcade, J. 2008. Evaluating one handed thumb tapping on mobile touchscreen devices. In Proc. of Graphics Interface. GI'08, Toronto, Canada, 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J., and Xiao, Y. 2003. When computers fade: Pervasive computing and situationally induced impairments and disabilities. In HCI Int'l. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2, 1298--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Soukoreff, R., and MacKenzie, I. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Elsevier, 61, 6, 751--789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wobbrock, J., and Gajos, K.. 2008. Goal crossing with mice and trackballs for people with motor impairments: Performance, submovements, and design directions. In ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 1, 1. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wobbrock, J., Myers, B., and Kembel, J. 2003. EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. In Proc. of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology. UIST '03. ACM Press, New York, NY, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards accessible touch interfaces

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!