skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Best intentions: health monitoring technology and children

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe findings from two studies aimed at understanding how health monitoring technology affects the parent-child relationship, examining emotional response and barriers to using this type of technology. We present suggestions for the design of health monitoring technology intended to enhance self-care in children without creating parent-child conflict. Our recommendations integrate the study findings, developmental stage specific concerns, and prior HCI research aimed at children's health.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. Care of children and adolescents with T1D. Diab Care 28 (2005), 186--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, B.J., Vangsness, L., Connell, A., Butler, D., Goebel-Gabbri, A. and Laffel, L.M. Family conflict, adherence, and glycemic Control in youth with short duration type 1 diabetes. Diab Med 19 (2002), 635--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Consolvo, S. Designing and evaluating a persuasive technology to encourage lifestyle behavior change. Doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gammon D., Årsand E., Walseth O.A., Andersson N, Jenssen M. and Taylor T. Parent-child interaction using a mobile and wireless system for BG monitoring. J Med Int Res 7:5 (2005), e57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Grimes, A., Tan, D. and Morris, D. Toward technologies that support family reflections on health. In Proc GROUP '09 (2009), 311--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Harris M., Wysocki T., Sadler M., Wilkinson K., Harvey L., Buckloh L., Mauras N., and White N. Validation of a structured interview for the assessment of diabetes self-management. Diab Care 23 (2000), 1301--1304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hayes, G., Gardere, L., Abowd, G., and Truong, K. CareLog: a selective archiving tool for behavior management in schools. In Proc CHI '08, ACM Press (2008), 685--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hood K., Butler D.B., Volkening L.K., Anderson B.J., and Laffel L. The blood glucose monitoring communication questionnaire. Diab Care 27 (2004), 2610--2615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kientz, J.A., Arriaga, R.I., Chetty, M., Hayes, G.R., Richardson, J., Patel, S.N. and Abowd, G.D. Grow and know: understanding record-keeping needs for tracking the development of young children. In Proc CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 1351--1360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kientz, J.A. Understanding parent-pediatrician interactions for the design of health technologies. In Proc IHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 230--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Maitland, J., Chalmers, M. and Siek, K.A. Persuasion not required: Improving our understanding of the sociotechnical context of dietary behavioural change. In Proc Pervasive Health '09 (2009), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E.D. and Kaufman, D.R. Investigating health management practices of individuals with diabetes. In Proc CHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E., Davidson, P. and Greenblatt, D. MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management. In Proc CHI '08, ACM Press (2008), 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Petersen, M.J., Madsen, K.H, and Kjaer, A. The usability of everyday technology: emerging and fading opportunities. TOCHI 9:2 (2002), 74--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rogers, Y. The changing face of human-computer interaction in the age of ubiquitous computing. In Proc USAB '09 (2009), 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rogol, A., Clark, P., Roemmich, J. Growth and pubertal development in children and adolescents: Effects of diet and activity. Am J Clin Nutr 72: 2 (2000), 521S-528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. The DCCT Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 44 (1995), 968 --983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Toscos, T., Ponder, S.W., Anderson, B.J., Davidson, M.B., Lee, M.L., Montemayor-Gonzalez, E., Reyes, P., Link, E., and McMahon, K. Integrating an Automated Diabetes Management System into the family management of Children with Type 1 Diabetes. To appear in Diab Care.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Best intentions: health monitoring technology and children

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader