ABSTRACT
Joint angles are commonly measured in physical rehabilitation to evaluate joint function. Evidences showed that wearable inertial sensors can accurately quantify human motion information, however, the most advanced and accurate methodologies require the execution of complex calibration movements which are unsuitable to inexpert users and inadequate for a home context. This way, four different joint angles estimation methods requiring no calibration movement were developed in order to track the main human body joint angles in real time. IMUs mounted in bracelets were used to restrict sensor positioning on the limbs. For six different exercises, the estimated absolute and relative joint angles were evaluated against the marker-based video tracking software Kinovea ground-truth. Correlation analysis between estimated and ground-truth joint angles indicated a very strong and statistically significant correlation. The average error in estimated joint angles is below 5 degrees for all four methods employed, which may be an acceptable result for the rehabilitation at home scenario.
References
- Marcelo Kallmann, Carlo Camporesi and Jay Han. 2015. VR-Assisted Physical Rehabilitation: Adapting to the Needs of Therapists and Patients. Virtual Realities, 147--168.Google Scholar
- Oonagh M. Giggins, Kevin T. Sweeney and Brian Caulfield. 2014. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 11, 158.Google Scholar
- Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I, Alejandro Galán-Mercant, and Jonathan M Williams. 2017. The Use of Inertial Sensors System for Human Motion Analysis. Physical Therapy Reviews 15, 6462--473.Google Scholar
- Lee Morton, Lynne Baillie and Roberto Ramirez-Iniguez. 2013. Pose Calibrations for Inertial Sensors in Rehabilitation Applications. In1st International Workshop on e-Health Pervasive Wireless Applications and Services (eHPWAS'13), 215--222Google Scholar
- Aras Yurtman and Billur Barshan. 2013. Detection and evaluation of physical therapy exercises by dynamic time warping using wearable motion sensor units. Information Sciences and Systems Springer 305--314.Google Scholar
- Iván Raso, Ramón Hervás and José Bravo. 2010. m-Physio: Personalized Accelerometer-based Physical Rehabilitation Platform. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies.Google Scholar
- Mahmoud Ahmed El-Gohary. 2013. Joint Angle Tracking with Inertial Sensors. PhD Dissertation. Portland State University.Google Scholar
- Thomas Seel, Jörg Raisch and Thomas Schauer. 2014. IMU-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Gait Analysis. Sensors 14, 4: 6891--6909.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- R. Nerino, L. Contin, A. Tirri, G. Massazza, A. Chimienti, G. Pettiti, N. Cau and V. Cimolin. 2014. An improved solution for knee rehabilitation at home. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets'14), 62--68. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bruno Bonnechère, Bart Jansen, Lubos Omeline and Serge Van Sint Jan. 2016. The use of commercial video games in rehabilitation: a systematic review. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 39, 4: 277--290.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- OpenStax College, Anatomy and Physiology. OpenStax CNX, {Online}. Retrieved November 15, 2016 from http://philschatz.com/anatomy-book/contents/m46402.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Kinovea. Retrieved January 26, 2017 from https://www.kinovea.org/Google Scholar
- Chapleau, Julien, Fanny Canet, Yvan Petit, G-Yves Laflamme and Dominique m.Rouleau. 2011. Validity of Goniometric Elbow Measurements: Comparative Study with a Radiographic Method.Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 469, 11:3134--3140.Google Scholar
- David Krause, Michael Boyd, Allison Hager, Eric Smoyer, Anthony Thompson and John Hollman. 2015. Reliability and accuracy of a goniometer mobile device application for video measurement of the functional movement screen deep squat test. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 10, 1 37--44.Google Scholar
- Sidia Callegari-Jacques. 2003. Bioestatística: princípios e aplicações. Artmed, Ed.: Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
- Timothy Carter, et al. 2009. Accuracy and Reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. Journal of hand surgery 34, 8: 1422--1428.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Damsted, Camma, Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen, and Lars Henrik Larsen. 2015. Reliability of video-based quantification of the knee and hip angle at foot strike during running. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 10, 2: 147--154.Google Scholar



Comments