10.1145/3220228.3220241acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpsprocConference Proceedings
research-article

UAS-based imagery and photogrammetric processing for tree height and crown diameter extraction

ABSTRACT

Advances in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) allowed them to become both flexible and cost-effective. When combined with computer vision data processing techniques they are a good way to obtain high-resolution imagery and 3D information. As such, UAS can be advantageous both for agriculture and forestry areas, where the need for data acquisition at specific times and within a specific time frame is crucial, enabling the extraction of several measurements from different crop types. In this study a low-cost UAS was used to survey an area mainly composed by chestnut trees (Castanea sativa Mill.). Flights were performed at different heights (ranging from 30 to 120 m), in single and double grid flight patterns, and photogrammetric processing was then applied. The obtained information consists of orthophoto mosaics and digital elevation models which enable the measurement of individual tree's parameters such as tree crown diameter and tree height. Results demonstrate that despite its lower spatial resolution, data from single grid flights carried out at higher heights provided more reliable results than data acquired at lower flight heights. Higher number of images acquired in double grid flights also improved the results. Overall, the obtained results are encouraging, presenting a R2 higher than 0.9 and an overall root mean square error of 44 cm.

References

  1. Panagiotidis, D. et al. 2017. Determining tree height and crown diameter from high-resolution UAV imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 38, 8--10 (May 2017), 2392--2410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Zhen, Z. et al. 2016. Trends in Automatic Individual Tree Crown Detection and Delineation---Evolution of LiDAR Data. Remote Sensing. 8, 4 (Apr. 2016), 333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gatziolis, D. et al. 2015. 3D Tree Dimensionality Assessment Using Photogrammetry and Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. PLOS ONE. 10, 9 (set 2015), e0137765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Pádua, L. et al. 2017. UAS, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: a review towards practical applications. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 38, 8--10 (May 2017), 2349--2391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fassnacht, F.E. et al. 2016. Review of studies on tree species classification from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 186, (Dec. 2016), 64--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stereńczak, K. 2013. Factors influencing individual tree crowns detection based on airborne laser scanning data. Forest Research Papers. 74, 4 (2013), 323--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Näsi, R. et al. 2015. Using UAV-Based Photogrammetry and Hyperspectral Imaging for Mapping Bark Beetle Damage at Tree-Level. Remote Sensing. 7, 11 (Nov. 2015), 15467--15493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Nevalainen, O. et al. 2017. Individual Tree Detection and Classification with UAV-Based Photogrammetric Point Clouds and Hyperspectral Imaging. Remote Sensing. 9, 3 (Feb. 2017), 185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zarco-Tejada, P.J. et al. 2014. Tree height quantification using very high resolution imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and automatic 3D photoreconstruction methods. European Journal of Agronomy. 55, (Apr. 2014), 89--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mohan, M. et al. 2017. Individual Tree Detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Derived Canopy Height Model in an Open Canopy Mixed Conifer Forest. Forests. 8, 9 (Sep. 2017), 340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ok, A.O. and Ozdarici-Ok, A. 2017. 2-D delineation of individual citrus trees from UAV-based dense photogrammetric surface models. International Journal of Digital Earth. 0, 0 (Jun. 2017), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Surový, P. et al. 2018. Estimation of positions and heights from UAV-sensed imagery in tree plantations in agrosilvopastoral systems. International Journal of Remote Sensing. (Feb. 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 2016. Diário daRepública n.° 238/2016, , Série II.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Delaunay, B. 1934. Sur la sphere vide. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otdelenie Matematicheskii i Estestvennyka Nauk. 7, 793--800 (1934), 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Menu Process > Processing Options... > 3. DSM, Orthomosaic and Index > DSM and Orthomosaic: http://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/202557769-Menu-Process-Processing-Options-3-DSM-Orthomosaic-and-Index-DSM-and-Orthomosaic. Accessed: 2018-02-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Popescu, S.C. 2007. Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar. Biomass and Bioenergy. 31, 9 (Sep. 2007), 646--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. UAS-based imagery and photogrammetric processing for tree height and crown diameter extraction

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!