skip to main content
10.1145/3306211.3320138acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
other

Cave: making collective virtual narrative

Published:28 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

CAVE is a shared narrative six degrees of freedom (6DoF) virtual reality experience. In 3.5 days, 1,927 people attended its premiere at SIGGRAPH 2018. Thirty participants at a time each saw and heard the same narrative from their own individual location in the room, as they would when attending live theater. CAVE set out to disruptively change how audiences collectively experience immersive art and entertainment. Inspired by the social gatherings of theater and cinema, CAVE resonated with viewers in powerful and meaningful ways. Its specific pairing of colocated audiences and physically shared immersive narrative suggests a possible future path for shared cinematic experiences.

References

  1. J. Koetsier, "VR Needs More Social: 77% of Virtual Reality Users Want More Social Engagement," Forbes, 30 April 2018. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2018/04/30/virtual-reality-77-of-vr-users-want-more-social-engagement-67-use-weekly-28-use-daily/#3e0204bf18fc, accessed 3 May 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Pringle, "Virtual reality is still too isolating to be `the next big thing' in tech," CBC News, 14 February 2017. Retrieved from www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/vr-isolation-1.3980539, accessed 3 May 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Lopez Dau (Director), Henry {Virtual Reality Experience}, 28 July 2015. U.S.A.: Oculus Story Studio.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Robles (Developer), Dispatch {Virtual Reality Experience}, 21 November 2017. U.S.A.: Here Be Dragons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Chung (Director), Allumette {Virtual Reality Experience}, 2016. U.S.A.: Penrose Studios.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Park et al. (Producers), C. Milk and A. Koblin (Directors), Life of Us {Virtual Reality Experience}, 2017. U.S.A.: Annapurna Pictures, Unity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Rogers, "Wreck-It Ralph Smashes into the VOID," Forbes, 16 November 2018. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/solrogers/2018/11/16/wreck-it-ralph-smashes-into-the-void/#183e5708503d, accessed 3 May 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Gochfeld et al., "Holojam in Wonderland: Immersive Mixed Reality Theater," Leonardo <b>51</b>, No. 4, 362--367 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. W.A. IJsselsteijn and G. Riva, "Being There: The Experience of Presence in Mediated Environments," in Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments, G. Riva, F. Davide and W.A. IJsselsteijn, eds. (Amsterdam: Ios Press, 2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Hofmann et al., "The influence of a virtual companion on amusement when watching funny films," Motivation and Emotion <b>39</b>, No. 3, 434--447 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D.J. Wimer and B.C. Beins, "Expectations and perceived humor," Humor: International Journal of Humor Research <b>21</b> (2008) pp. 347--363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '19: ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Art Gallery
    July 2019
    126 pages
    ISBN:9781450363112
    DOI:10.1145/3306211

    Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 July 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • other

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader