Creativity Encounters Between Children and Robots

ABSTRACT

Creativity is an intrinsic human ability with multiple benefits across lifespan. Despite its importance, societies not always are well equipped to provide contexts for creativity stimulation; as a consequence, a major decline in creative abilities occurs at the age of 7 years old. In this paper, we investigated the effectiveness of using a robotic system named YOLO, as an intervention tool to stimulate creativity in children. During the intervention, children used YOLO as a character for their stories and through the interaction with the robot, creative abilities were stimulated. Our study (n = 62) included 3 experimental conditions: i) YOLO displayed behaviors based on creativity techniques; ii) YOLO displayed behaviors based on creativity techniques plus social behaviors; iii) YOLO was turned off, not displaying any behaviors. We measured children's creative abilities at pre and posttesting and their creative process through behavior analysis. Results showed that the interaction with YOLO contributed to higher creativity levels in children, specifically contributing to the generation of more original ideas during story creation. This study shows the potential of using social robots as tools to empower intrinsic human abilities, such as the ability of being creative.

References

1. R. Ritchhart and K. Robinson, “Out of our minds: Learning to be creative,” 2001.
2. S. W. Russ, A. L. Robins, and B. A. Christiano, “Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 129--139, 1999.
3. B. W. Roberts and D. Mroczek, “Personality trait change in adulthood,” Current directions in psychological science, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 31--35, 2008.
4. A. Gopnik, T. L. Griffiths, and C. G. Lucas, “When younger learners can be better (or at least more open-minded) than older ones,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 87--92, 2015.
5. K. Robinson, Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Mankato, MN, USA: Capstone, 2011.
6. P. Collard and J. Looney, “Nurturing creativity in education,” European Journal of Education, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 348--364, 2014.
7. J. Baer, “Content matters: Why nurturing creativity is so different in different domains,” in Creative Contradictions in Education, R. A. Beghetto and B. Sriraman, Eds.hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 129--140.
8. J. Kaufman, “Creativity as a stepping stone toward a brighter future,” Journal of Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1--7, 2018.
9. D. Chadha, “A curriculum model for transferable skills development,” engineering education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19--24, 2006.
10. T. Lewis, “Creativity in technology education: Providing children with glimpses of their inventive potential,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 255--268, 2009.
11. J. S. Dacey, “Peak periods of creative growth across the lifespan,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 224--247, 1989.
12. N. Kogan, “Creativity and cognitive style: A life-span perspective,” in Life-Span Developmental Psychology: Personality and Socialization, P. B. Baltes and K. W. Schaie, Eds.hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press, 1973, pp. 145--178.
13. R. K. Sawyer, M. Csikszentmihalyi, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, D. H. Feldman, H. Gardner, R. J. Sternberg, J. Nakamura et al., Creativity and development. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2003.
14. B. Spodek and O. N. Saracho, Handbook of research on the education of young children. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Routledge, 2014.
15. K. H. Kim, “The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the torrance tests of creative thinking,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 285--295, 2011.
16. D. B. Haun and M. Tomasello, “Conformity to peer pressure in preschool children,” Child development, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1759--1767, 2011.
17. M. A. Runco, S. Acar, and N. Cayirdag, “A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 24, pp. 242--249, 2017.
18. G. Scott, L. E. Leritz, and M. D. Mumford, “The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review,” Creativity research journal, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 361--388, 2004.
19. S. Chan and M. Yuen, “Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers' creativity-fostering practices in hong kong,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 12, pp. 69--77, 2014.
20. T. Belpaeme, J. Kennedy, A. Ramachandran, B. Scassellati, and F. Tanaka, “Social robots for education: A review,” Science robotics, vol. 3, no. 21, p. eaat5954, 2018.
21. F. J. Corbalán Berná, F. Mart'inez Zaragoza, D. S. Donolo, C. Alonso Monreal, M. Tejerina Arreal, and R. M. Limi nana Gras, “Crea. inteligencia creativa. una medida cognitiva de la creatividad,” 2003.
22. H. G. Jellen and K. K. Urban, “The tct-dp (test for creative thinking-drawing production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups.” Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 1986.
23. J. P. Guilford, “The nature of human intelligence.” 1967.
24. R. M. Netting, Cultural ecology, 1986, no. 304.2 N47.
25. J. Forlizzi, “The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture,” International Journal of design, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008.
26. E. P. Torrance, Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual: Verbal tests, forms a and b: Figural tests, forms a and b. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Personal Press, Incorporated, 1966.
27. R. J. Sternberg, “Creativity or creativities?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 63, no. 4--5, pp. 370--382, 2005.
28. L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. C. Wittrock, “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition,” White Plains, NY: Longman, 2001.
29. C. W. Taylor, “Various approaches to and definitions of creativity,” The nature of creativity, pp. 99--121, 1988.
30. R. E. Mayer, “22 fifty years of creativity research,” Handbook of creativity, vol. 449, 1999.
31. J. A. Plucker, R. A. Beghetto, and G. T. Dow, “Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research,” Educational psychologist, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 83--96, 2004.
32. T. M. Amabile, Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Hachette UK, 1996.
33. K. Sawyer, Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Basic Books, 2017.
34. R. K. Sawyer, “Individual and group creativity,” The Cambridge handbook of creativity, pp. 366--380, 2010.
35. P. B. Paulus and B. A. Nijstad, Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Oxford University Press, 2003.
36. J. Mueller and M. A. Cronin, “How relational processes support team creativity,” in Creativity in groups. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009, pp. 291--310.
37. M. A. Cronin and J. Loewenstein, The Craft of Creativity. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Stanford University Press, 2018.
38. J. A. Plucker and M. C. Makel, “Assessment of creativity,” The Cambridge handbook of creativity, pp. 48--73, 2010.
39. J. Baer and S. S. McKool, “Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique,” in Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax IGI Global, 2009, pp. 65--77.
40. D. H. Cropley and J. C. Kaufman, “Measuring functional creativity: Non-expert raters and the creative solution diagnosis scale,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 119--137, 2012.
41. P. H. Kahn Jr, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, B. T. Gill, S. Shen, J. H. Ruckert, and H. E. Gary, “Human creativity can be facilitated through interacting with a social robot,” in The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax IEEE Press, 2016, pp. 173--180.
42. S. Ali, T. Moroso, and C. Breazeal, “Can children learn creativity from a social robot?” in Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax ACM, 2019, pp. 359--368.
43. J. E. Pretz and D. Nelson, “Creativity is influenced by domain, creative self-efficacy, mindset, self-efficacy, and self-esteem,” in The creative self. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Elsevier, 2017, pp. 155--170.
44. M. Karwowski, “Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 62, 2014.
45. R. W. Hass, J. Katz-Buonincontro, and R. Reiter-Palmon, “Disentangling creative mindsets from creative self-efficacy and creative identity: Do people hold fixed and growth theories of creativity?” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 436, 2016.
46. H. W. Park, R. Rosenberg-Kima, M. Rosenberg, G. Gordon, and C. Breazeal, “Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer,” in 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax IEEE, 2017, pp. 137--145.
47. L. P. Hagtvedt, K. Dossinger, S. H. Harrison, and L. Huang, “Curiosity made the cat more creative: Specific curiosity as a driver of creativity,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 150, pp. 1--13, 2019.
48. G. Gordon, C. Breazeal, and S. Engel, “Can children catch curiosity from a social robot?” in 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax IEEE, 2015, pp. 91--98.
49. J. Ceha, N. Chhibber, J. Goh, C. McDonald, P.-Y. Oudeyer, D. Kulić, and E. Law, “Expression of curiosity in social robots: Design, perception, and effects on behaviour,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax ACM, 2019, p. 406.
50. P. Alves-Oliveira, P. Arriaga, A. Paiva, and G. Hoffman, “Guide to build yolo, a creativity-stimulating robot for children,” HardwareX, vol. 6, p. e00074, 2019.
51. W. Ju, “The design of implicit interactions,” Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1--93, 2015.
52. A. B. VanGundy, Techniques of structured problem solving. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Springer, 1988.
53. T. Rickards, Problem-solving through creative analysis. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax Wiley, 1975.
54. P. Alves-Oliveira, S. Gomes, A. Chandak, P. Arriaga, G. Hoffman, and A. Paiva, “Software architecture for yolo, a creativity-stimulating robot,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10823, 2019.
55. J. Duarte, S. Imaginário, and S. Jesus, “Criatividade em estudantes universitários. validacc ao preliminar do crea em portugal. instituto de psicologia cognitiva, desenvolvimento vocacional e social,” Psycaware e-journal, 2010.
56. L. Almeida and S. I. Nogueira, “Estudo preliminar do teste test for creative thinking-drawing production (tct-dp),” Psychologica, no. 52-I, pp. 193--210, 2010.
57. S. I. Nogueira, L. S. Almeida, and T. S. Lima, “Two tracks of thought: A structural model of the test for creative thinking-drawing production (tct-dp),” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 206--211, 2017.
58. A. J. Cuddy, S. T. Fiske, and P. Glick, “Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the bias map,” Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 40, pp. 61--149, 2008.
59. S. Fiske, A. Cuddy, P. Glick, and J. Xu, “A model of stereotype content as often mixed: Separate dimensions of competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 878--902, 2002.
60. J. C. Read, “Validating the fun toolkit: an instrument for measuring children's opinions of technology,” Cognition, Technology & Work, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 119--128, 2008.
61. J. C. Read, M. Horton, G. Sim, P. Gregory, D. Fitton, and B. Cassidy, “Check: a tool to inform and encourage ethical practice in participatory design with children,” in CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax ACM, 2013, pp. 187--192.
62. P. Alves-Oliveira, P. Arriaga, M. A. Cronin, A. Paiva, and G. Hoffman, “Creativity encounters,” Retrieved from osf.io/hyxfu, 2019.
63. B. A. Nosek, C. R. Ebersole, A. C. DeHaven, and D. T. Mellor, “The preregistration revolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 2600--2606, 2018.
64. B. Irfan, J. Kennedy, S. Lemaignan, F. Papadopoulos, E. Senft, and T. Belpaeme, “Social psychology and human-robot interaction: An uneasy marriage,” in Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. hskip 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emrelax ACM, 2018, pp. 13--20.
65. S. W. Russ, “Demonstrating effects with children: When do we know we know?” 2014.
66. R. E. Larzelere, B. R. Kuhn, and B. Johnson, “The intervention selection bias: an underrecognized confound in intervention research.” Psychological bulletin, vol. 130, no. 2, p. 289, 2004.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Empirical studies in HCI