Abstract
All real-time computer games, particularly networked computer games, have a delay from when a player starts an action (e.g., clicking the mouse) until the game renders the result (e.g., firing a projectile). This delay can degrade both player performance (e.g., reduced game score) and quality of experience (e.g., the game is less fun). While previous work has studied the effects of delay on commercial games and individual game actions, a more detailed understanding is needed of the effects of delay on moving target selection with realistic target motion, a common scenario in many games. This paper presents an in-depth study of the effects of delay on the fundamental game action of selecting a moving target with a mouse while varying two parameters for the target motion – turn frequency and turn angle. We design and implement a custom game where players select moving targets using a mouse, while the game controls both the target motion and input delay. Analysis of data gathered in a 56-person user study shows both target selection time and accuracy degrade with delay. However, both selection time and accuracy increase with the frequency and angle of changes in the target’s movement, because turning slows targets down even while making them less predictable. We set these results in the context of other studies of delay and target selection by comparing our findings to those in seven other previously published papers that investigated the effects of delay on target selection.
- Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 1997. Beyond Fitts’ law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 295--302.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Rahul Amin, France Jackson, Juan E. Gilbert, Jim Martin, and Terry Shaw. 2013. Assessing the impact of latency and jitter on the perceived quality of Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2. In Proceedings of HCI -- Users and Contexts of Use. Las Vegas, NV, USA, 97--106.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Justin Andress. [n.d.]. Why ’Super Smash Bros. Melee’ Pros Play on Ancient TVs. https://tinyurl.com/twhkkdb.Google Scholar
- Tom Beigbeder, Rory Coughlan, Corey Lusher, John Plunkett, Emmanuel Agu, and Mark Claypool. 2004. The effects of loss and latency on user performance in Unreal Tournament 2003. In Proceedings of ACM Network and System Support for Games Workshop (NetGames). Portland, OG, USA.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yahn W. Bernier. 2001. Latency compensating methods in client/server in-game protocol design and optimization. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- M. Buckland. 2010. Programming Game AI by Example. Jones 8 Bartlett.Google Scholar
- K. Chen, P. Haung, G. Wang, C. Huang, and C. Lee. 2006. On the sensitivity of online game playing time to network QoS. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
- Kuan-Ta Chen, Yu-Chun Chang, Hwai-Jung Hsu, De-Yu Chen, Chun-Ying Huang, and Cheng-Hsin Hsu. 2014. On the quality of service of cloud gaming systems. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 26, 2 (Feb. 2014).Google Scholar
- Mark Claypool. 2005. The effect of latency on user performance in real-time strategy games. Elsevier Computer Networks, Special Issue on Networking Issues in Entertainment Computing 49, 1 (Sept. 2005), 52--70.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Mark Claypool and Kajal Claypool. 2006. Latency and player actions in online games. Commun. ACM 49, 11 (Nov. 2006).Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mark Claypool, Andy Cockburn, and Carl Gutwin. 2019. Game input with delay - moving target selection parameters. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys). Amherst, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Mark Claypool, Ragnhild Eg, and Kjetil Raaen. 2017. Modeling user performance for moving target selection with a delayed mouse. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on MultiMedia Modeling (MMM). Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Mark Claypool and David Finkel. 2014. The effects of latency on player performance in cloud-based games. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Network and System Support for Games (NetGames). Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Paul M. Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 6 (June 1954), 381--391.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sebastian Friston, Per Karlström, and Anthony Steed. 2016. The effects of low latency on pointing and steering tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 5 (May 2016), 1605--1615.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Tobias Fritsch, Hartmut Ritter, and Jochen H. Schiller. 2005. The effect of latency and network limitations on MMORPGs: A field study of everquest 2. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Network and System Support for Games (NetGames). Hawthorne, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Abir Al Hajri, Sidney Fels, Gregor Miller, and Michael Ilich. 2011. Moving target selection in 2D graphical user interfaces. In Proceeding of IFIP TC Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT). Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Errol Hoffmann. 1991. Capture of moving targets: A modification of Fitts’ law. Ergonomics 34, 2 (1991), 211--220.Google Scholar
- Errol Hoffmann. 1992. Fitts’ law with transmission delay. Ergonomics 35, 1 (1992), 37--48.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Zenja Ivkovic, Ian Stavness, Carl Gutwin, and Steven Sutcliffe. 2015. Quantifying and mitigating the negative effects of local latencies on aiming in 3D shooter games. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul, Korea, 135--144.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Jagacinski, D. Repperger, S. Ward, and M. Moran. 1980. A test of Fitts’ law with moving targets. The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 22, 2 (April 1980), 225--233.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Michael Jarschel, Daniel Schlosser, Sven Scheuring, and Tobias Hossfeld. 2011. An evaluation of QoE in cloud gaming based on subjective tests. In Proccedings of the Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. Seoul, Korea, 330--335.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ricardo Jota, Albert Ng, Paul Dietz, and Daniel Wigdor. 2013. How fast is fast enough?: A study of the effects of latency in direct-touch pointing tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. Kerr. 1973. Movement time in an underwater environment. Journal of Motor Behavior 5, 3 (1973), 175--178.Google Scholar
- M. Long and C. Gutwin. 2018. Characterizing and modeling the effects of local latency on game performance and experience. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI Play). Melbourne, VC, Australia.Google Scholar
- Michael Long and Carl Gutwin. 2019. Effects of local latency on game pointing devices and game pointing tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Glasgow, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- I. S. MacKenzie and W. Buxton. 1992. Extending fitts’ law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Monterey, CA, USA, 219--226.Google Scholar
- I. Scott MacKenzie and Colin Ware. 1993. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- James Nichols and Mark Claypool. 2004. The effects of latency on online madden NFL football. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV). Kinsale, County Cork, Ireland.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lothar Pantel and Lars C. Wolf. 2002. On the impact of delay on real-time multiplayer games. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV). Miami, FL, USA.Google Scholar
- A. Pavlovych and C. Gutwin. 2012. Assessing target acquisition and tracking performance for complex moving targets in the presence of latency and jitter. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface Conference. Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- A. Pavlovych and W. Stuerzlinger. 2011. Target following performance in the presence of latency, jitter, and signal dropouts. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface Conference. St. John’s, NL, Canada, 33--40.Google Scholar
- Peter Quax, Patrick Monsieurs, Wim Lamotte, Danny De Vleeschauwer, and Natalie Degrande. 2004. Objective and subjective evaluation of the influence of small amounts of delay and jitter on a recent first person shooter game. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames).Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Raaen and R. Eg. 2015. Instantaneous human-computer interactions: Button causes and screen effects. In Proceedings of the 17th HCI International Conference. Los Angeles, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Kjetil Raaen and Andreas Petlund. 2015. How much delay is there really in current games? Proceedings of ACM Multimedia Systems (March 2015).Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Sackl, R. Schatz, T. Hossfeld, F. Metzger, D. Lister, and R. Irmer. 2016. QoE management made uneasy: The case of cloud gaming. In IEEE Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
- Shafiee Sabet Saeed, Steven Schmidt, Saman Zadtootaghaj, Carsten Griwodz, and Sebastian Moller. 2018. Towards applying game adaptation to decrease the impact of delay on quality of experience. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM). 114--121.Google Scholar
- R. W. Soukoreff and I. S. MacKenzie. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation -- perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. Elsevier International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 751--789.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R. J. Teather, A. Pavlovych, W. Stuerzlinger, and I. S. MacKenzie. 2009. Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. Lafayette, LA, USA, 43--50.Google Scholar
- C. Ware and H. Mikaelian. 1987. An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input. In Proceedings of ACM Human Factors in Comp. Systems and Graphics Interface. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Index Terms
The Impact of Motion and Delay on Selecting Game Targets with a Mouse
Recommendations
Lower is Better? The Effects of Local Latencies on Competitive First-Person Shooter Game Players
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsVideo game play is among the most popular forms of entertainment in the world and eSports is a multi-billion dollar industry. Esports gamers, and competitive gamers more broadly, want fast game systems to maximize their chances of winning. In general, ...
Game Input with Delay—Moving Target Selection with a Game Controller Thumbstick
Special Section on Delay-Sensitive Video Computing in the Cloud and Special Section on Extended MMSys-NOSSDAV Best PapersHosting interactive video-based services, such as computer games, in the Cloud poses particular challenges given user sensitivity to delay. A better understanding of the impact of delay on player-game interactions can help design cloud systems and games ...
Game input with delay: moving target selection parameters
MMSys '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Multimedia Systems ConferenceAll real-time computer games, particularly networked computer games, have a delay from when a player starts an action (e.g., clicking the mouse) until the game renders the result (e.g., firing a projectile). This delay can degrade both player ...






Comments