10.1145/3503161.3548764acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Few-Shot Model Agnostic Federated Learning

Published:10 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Federated learning has received increasing attention for its ability to collaborative learning without leaking privacy. Promising advances have been achieved under the assumption that participants share the same model structure. However, when participants independently customize their models, models suffer communication barriers, which leads the model heterogeneity problem. Moreover, in real scenarios, the data held by participants is often limited, making the local models trained only on private data present poor performance. Consequently, this paper studies a new challenging problem, namely few-shot model agnostic federated learning, where the local participants design their independent models from their limited private datasets. Considering the scarcity of the private data, we propose to utilize the abundant public available datasets for bridging the gap between local private participants. However, its usage also brings in two problems: inconsistent labels and large domain gap between the public and private datasets. To address these issues, this paper presents a novel framework with two main parts: 1) model agnostic federated learning, it performs public-private communication by unifying the model prediction outputs on the shared public datasets; 2) latent embedding adaptation, it addresses the domain gap with an adversarial learning scheme to discriminate the public and private domains. Together with theoretical generalization bound analysis, comprehensive experiments under various settings have verified our advantage over existing methods. It provides a simple but effective baseline for future advancement. The code is available at https://github.com/WenkeHuang/FSMAFL.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ACMMM22-FSFL-14-Video.mp4

Presentation video

References

  1. Shai Ben-David, John Blitzer, Koby Crammer, and Fernando Pereira. 2007. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 137--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. John Blitzer, Koby Crammer, Alex Kulesza, Fernando Pereira, and Jennifer Wortman. 2007. Learning bounds for domain adaptation. Advances in neural information processing systems 20 (2007), 129--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Debora Caldarola, Massimiliano Mancini, Fabio Galasso, Marco Ciccone, Emanuele Rodolà, and Barbara Caputo. 2021. Cluster-driven graph federated learning over multiple domains. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2749--2758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L Elisa Celis and Vijay Keswani. 2019. Improved adversarial learning for fair classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10443 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yiqiang Chen, Xin Qin, JindongWang, Chaohui Yu, andWen Gao. 2020. Fedhealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gregory Cohen, Saeed Afshar, Jonathan Tapson, and Andre Van Schaik. 2017. EMNIST: Extending MNIST to handwritten letters. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. 2921--2926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Changying Du, Changde Du, Xingyu Xie, Chen Zhang, and Hao Wang. 2018. Multi-view adversarially learned inference for cross-domain joint distribution matching. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1348--1357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Xiuwen Fang and Mang Ye. 2022. Robust Federated Learning with Noisy and Heterogeneous Clients. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rui Feng, Yang Yang, Yuehan Lyu, Chenhao Tan, Yizhou Sun, and Chunping Wang. 2019. Learning fair representations via an adversarial framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.13341 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yaroslav Ganin and Victor Lempitsky. 2015. Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. In International conference on machine learning. 1180--1189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yaroslav Ganin, Evgeniya Ustinova, Hana Ajakan, Pascal Germain, Hugo Larochelle, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, and Victor Lempitsky. 2016. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. The journal of machine learning research 17, 1 (2016), 2096--2030.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Michelle Goddard. 2017. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): European regulation that has a global impact. International Journal of Market Research 59, 6 (2017), 703--705.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gautham Krishna Gudur, Bala Shyamala Balaji, and Satheesh K Perepu. 2020. Resource-Constrained Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Labels and Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03206 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Andrew Hard, Kanishka Rao, Rajiv Mathews, Swaroop Ramaswamy, Françoise Beaufays, Sean Augenstein, Hubert Eichner, Chloé Kiddon, and Daniel Ramage. 2018. Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Andrew Hard, Kanishka Rao, Rajiv Mathews, Swaroop Ramaswamy, Françoise Beaufays, Sean Augenstein, Hubert Eichner, Chloé Kiddon, and Daniel Ramage. 2018. Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. https://www.mindspore.cn/. 2020. Mindspore. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wenke Huang, Mang Ye, and Bo Du. 2022. Learn from others and be yourself in heterogeneous federated learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yutao Huang, Lingyang Chu, Zirui Zhou, Lanjun Wang, Jiangchuan Liu, Jian Pei, and Yong Zhang. 2021. Personalized Cross-Silo Federated Learning on Non-IID Data. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 7865--7873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jonathan J. Hull. 1994. A database for handwritten text recognition research. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16, 5 (1994), 550--554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ce Ju, Ruihui Zhao, Jichao Sun, Xiguang Wei, Bo Zhao, Yang Liu, Hongshan Li, Tianjian Chen, Xinwei Zhang, Dashan Gao, et al. 2020. Privacy-Preserving Technology to Help Millions of People: Federated Prediction Model for Stroke Prevention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10517 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ce Ju, Ruihui Zhao, Jichao Sun, Xiguang Wei, Bo Zhao, Yang Liu, Hongshan Li, Tianjian Chen, Xinwei Zhang, Dashan Gao, et al. 2020. Privacy-preserving technology to help millions of people: Federated prediction model for stroke prevention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10517 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Peter Kairouz, H Brendan McMahan, Brendan Avent, Aurélien Bellet, Mehdi Bennis, Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, Keith Bonawitz, Zachary Charles, Graham Cormode, Rachel Cummings, et al. 2019. Advances and open problems in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jakub KonečnỴ, H Brendan McMahan, Daniel Ramage, and Peter Richtárik. 2016. Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jakub KonečnỴ, H Brendan McMahan, Felix X Yu, Peter Richtárik, Ananda Theertha Suresh, and Dave Bacon. 2016. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jakub KonečnỴ, H Brendan McMahan, Felix X Yu, Peter Richtárik, Ananda Theertha Suresh, and Dave Bacon. 2016. Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradientbased learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278--2324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Daliang Li and Junpu Wang. 2019. Fedmd: Heterogenous federated learning via model distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03581 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Qinbin Li, Bingsheng He, and Dawn Song. 2021. Model-Contrastive Federated Learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 10713--10722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Tian Li, Anit Kumar Sahu, Ameet Talwalkar, and Virginia Smith. 2020. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 37, 3 (2020), 50--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Xiaoxiao Li, Meirui Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Michael Kamp, and Qi Dou. 2021. Fed{BN}: Federated Learning on Non-{IID} Features via Local Batch Normalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Paul Pu Liang, Terrance Liu, Liu Ziyin, Nicholas B Allen, Randy P Auerbach, David Brent, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2020. Think locally, act globally: Federated learning with local and global representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Edvin Listo Zec, Olof Mogren, John Martinsson, Leon René Sütfeld, and Daniel Gillblad. 2020. Federated learning using a mixture of experts. arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv--2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Quande Liu, Cheng Chen, Jing Qin, Qi Dou, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2021. FedDG: Federated Domain Generalization on Medical Image Segmentation via Episodic Learning in Continuous Frequency Space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1013--1023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 1273--1282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Payman Mohassel and Yupeng Zhang. 2017. Secureml: A system for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning. In SSP. 19--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Yuval Netzer, Tao Wang, Adam Coates, Alessandro Bissacco, Bo Wu, and Andrew Y Ng. 2011. Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Xingchao Peng, Zijun Huang, Yizhe Zhu, and Kate Saenko. 2019. Federated Adversarial Domain Adaptation. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Xingchao Peng, Zijun Huang, Yizhe Zhu, and Kate Saenko. 2019. Federated adversarial domain adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02054 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Daniel Peterson, Pallika Kanani, and Virendra J Marathe. 2019. Private federated learning with domain adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06733 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Frank Rosenblatt. 1961. Principles of neurodynamics. perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Technical Report. Cornell Aeronautical Lab Inc Buffalo NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Prasun Roy, Subhankar Ghosh, Saumik Bhattacharya, and Umapada Pal. 2018. Effects of degradations on deep neural network architectures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.10108 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Tao Shen, Jie Zhang, Xinkang Jia, Fengda Zhang, Gang Huang, Pan Zhou, FeiWu, and Chao Wu. 2020. Federated Mutual Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16765 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Benyuan Sun, Hongxing Huo, Yi Yang, and Bo Bai. 2021. PartialFed: Cross- Domain Personalized Federated Learning via Partial Initialization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Canh T. Dinh, Nguyen Tran, and Josh Nguyen. 2020. Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 21394--21405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell. 2017. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7167--7176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Vladimir Vapnik and Vlamimir Vapnik. 1998. Statistical learning theory Wiley. New York 1 (1998), 624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Omar AbdelWahab, Azzam Mourad, Hadi Otrok, and Tarik Taleb. 2021. Federated machine learning: Survey, multi-level classification, desirable criteria and future directions in communication and networking systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 23, 2 (2021), 1342--1397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Yongxin Tong. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 10, 2 (2019), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Yongxin Tong. 2019. Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (2019), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Mang Ye and Jianbing Shen. 2020. Probabilistic Structural Latent Representation for Unsupervised Embedding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Mang Ye, Jianbing Shen, Xu Zhang, Pong C Yuen, and Shih-Fu Chang. 2020. Augmentation Invariant and Instance Spreading Feature for Softmax Embedding. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Edvin Listo Zec, John Martinsson, Olof Mogren, Leon René Sütfeld, and Daniel Gillblad. 2020. Specialized Federated Learning Using Mixture of Experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02056 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Yabin Zhang, Bin Deng, Hui Tang, Lei Zhang, and Kui Jia. 2020. Unsupervised multi-class domain adaptation: Theory, algorithms, and practice. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sicheng Zhao, Xiangyu Yue, Shanghang Zhang, Bo Li, Han Zhao, Bichen Wu, Ravi Krishna, Joseph E Gonzalez, Alberto L Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Sanjit A Seshia, et al. 2020. A review of single-source deep unsupervised visual domain adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yue Zhao, Meng Li, Liangzhen Lai, Naveen Suda, Damon Civin, and Vikas Chandra. 2018. Federated learning with non-iid data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiming Zhuang, Yonggang Wen, Xuesen Zhang, Xin Gan, Daiying Yin, Dongzhan Zhou, Shuai Zhang, and Shuai Yi. 2020. Performance Optimization of Federated Person Re-identification via Benchmark Analysis. In ACM Multimedia. 955--963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Few-Shot Model Agnostic Federated Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)518
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)47

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!