10.1145/961511.961519acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedings
ARTICLE

Using lab exams to ensure programming practice in an introductory programming course

ABSTRACT

The high variability of students' backgrounds typically found in introductory programming courses creates additional difficulties to foster motivation and ensure the desired competency and retention rates. This paper presents and discusses the results of applying an assessment methodology strongly based upon lab exams (or on-computer exams) with the objective of ensuring programming pratice competency while maintaining students' motivation. It discusses the difficult balances of several assessment methods, details the used assessment methodology and finally presents students results and views. These show that lab exams, although more demanding then group assignments, can be made popular among students if they perceived them as fairer.

References

  1. T. Beaubouef, R. Lucas, and J. Howatt. The UNLOCK System: Enhancing Problem Solving Skills in CS-1 Students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(2):43--46, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mary Elaine Califf and Mary Goodwin. Testing Skills and Knowledge: Introducing a Laboratory Exam in CSI. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 217--221. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. B. Henderson, D. Baldwin, V. Dasigi, M. Dupras, J. Fritz, D. Ginat, D. Goelman, J. Hamer, L. Hitchner, W. Lloyd, J. Bill Marion, C. Ridesel, and H. Walker. Striving for Mathematical Thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(4):114--124, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Norman Jacobson. Using On-Computer Exams to Ensure Beginning Students' Programming Competency. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(4):53--56, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Kölling and John Rosenberg. Guidelines for Teaching Object Orientation with Java. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 33--36. ACM Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eric Roberts. Strategies for Encouraging Individual Achievement in Introductory Computer Science Courses. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 295--299. ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Matt Roddan. The Determinants of Student Failure and Attrition in First Year Computing Science. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~roddanmc/Report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mack Thweatt. CS1 Closed Lab vs. Open Lab Experiment. In Selected Papers of the Twenty-Fifth Annual SIGCSE Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 80--82. ACM Press, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using lab exams to ensure programming practice in an introductory programming course

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!